20.02.2013 Views

Drug Targeting Organ-Specific Strategies

Drug Targeting Organ-Specific Strategies

Drug Targeting Organ-Specific Strategies

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

3.10 In Vitro Particle Size Analysis and Deposition Measurements 79<br />

trast, collection efficiency in vivo decreases with decreasing particle size (deposition mechanism)<br />

to a minimum of 20% for particles with an aerodynamic diameter of 0.5 µm (e.g. [8]).<br />

The classification by impactors into a small number of classes for the relevant particle sizes<br />

(one to seven) may provide insufficient discrimination. For example, the theoretical cut-off<br />

(with 50% collection efficiency) for the third stage of the multistage liquid impinger (MSLI)<br />

is 3.1 µm at 60 l min –1 for particles with a true density of 1.5 g cm –3 . So, the fraction retained<br />

from the fourth impactor stage plus filter is smaller than 3.1 µm. If the MMAD of this fraction<br />

is 2 µm, deposition efficiency in the respiratory tract can be nearly 40%. If however, the<br />

MMAD of this fraction is only 1 µm, the deposition efficiency is only about 20%, which is<br />

twice as low. This difference cannot be judged from the cascade impactor result.<br />

Usually, the inspiratory flow through impactors is an on–off function: a (solenoid) valve is<br />

opened to allow suction at a pre-set flow rate through the inhalation device over a certain period.<br />

Some recent guidelines prescribe a flow rate corresponding with 4 kPa pressure drop<br />

for DPIs. Asking and Olsson derived a useful relationship for the effective cut-off diameters<br />

for the different stages of the MSLI as function of the flow rate for the range between 30 and<br />

100 l min –1 [123]. Impactors have relatively large volumes and high airflow resistances which<br />

confine the range of adjustable PIFR and FIR. Probably the major drawback of cascade impactor<br />

analysis is that the technique is extremely laborious and time consuming.<br />

Laser diffraction is a fast alternative for analysis of the size distribution of particles in an<br />

aerosol cloud.The theory of laser diffraction is well understood [124,125]) but this technique<br />

requires special measures to test inhalation devices and to interpret the results correctly. One<br />

of the major problems is that flow adjustment through the inhaler is not possible. Furthermore,<br />

the presence of carrier particles from adhesive mixtures may disturb the measurement<br />

of the fine drug particles and the size distribution obtained is of an unknown delivered mass<br />

fraction of the dose.These practical problems and limitations have been solved by the design<br />

of a new modular inhaler adapter for the Sympatec laser diffraction apparatus (Figure 3.6).<br />

Preseparator<br />

Fine particle collector<br />

Figure 3.6. Schematic representation of a new inhaler adapter for laser diffraction characterization of<br />

the aerosol cloud.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!