01.03.2013 Views

scostep 2010 (stp12) - Leibniz-Institut für Atmosphärenphysik an der ...

scostep 2010 (stp12) - Leibniz-Institut für Atmosphärenphysik an der ...

scostep 2010 (stp12) - Leibniz-Institut für Atmosphärenphysik an der ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

STP12 Abstracts<br />

Berlin, 12 - 16 July <strong>2010</strong><br />

SCOSTEP Symposium <strong>2010</strong><br />

Particle tracing within noctilucent clouds in the polar summer mesosphere<br />

Kili<strong>an</strong>i Joh<strong>an</strong>nes, Lübken Fr<strong>an</strong>z-Josef, Berger Uwe, Baumgarten Gerd, Hoffm<strong>an</strong>n Peter<br />

<strong>Leibniz</strong>-<strong>Institut</strong>e of Atmospheric Physics<br />

We use the LIMA/ICE Lagr<strong>an</strong>gi<strong>an</strong> model for NLC simulation to investigate the history of<br />

large mesospheric ice particles prior to <strong>an</strong>d after observation <strong>an</strong>d to look into the origin <strong>an</strong>d<br />

development of noctilucent clouds. To that end, we sc<strong>an</strong> given NLC events for large particles<br />

(e.g., > 20nm) <strong>an</strong>d then trace those backward in time to their nucleation <strong>an</strong>d forward to their<br />

evaporation. From this, characteristic properties like me<strong>an</strong> radius, growth rate, local water<br />

vapor (super-)saturation etc. are plotted in time series to characterize NLC particle<br />

development.<br />

As validation for the trajectory modeling, modeled winds from LIMA are compared to<br />

measurements of radar data from Andenes (69°N) <strong>an</strong>d Juliusruh (55°N).<br />

We observe a generally good agreement of modeled winds with radar winds for the Andenes<br />

latitude, so the focus of trajectory tracing are NLC oberserved near 69°N. Higher <strong>an</strong>d lower<br />

latitudes are also consi<strong>der</strong>ed, but those results are used more cautiously, as validation for the<br />

winds used in modeling is not as conclusive in this case.<br />

Particle lifetime is dependent on latitude, with NLC particles observed near the pole<br />

remaining small <strong>an</strong>d close to the mesopause much longer th<strong>an</strong> those at lower latitudes. At<br />

69°N, the typical growth <strong>an</strong>d sedimentation process may take a day or longer, while ice<br />

particles observed at the very edge of the NLC latitude r<strong>an</strong>ge tend to grow within hours before<br />

being observed. This may be explained with much more variability in saturation ratios of air<br />

carrying ice particles in mid-latitudes compared to higher latitudes.<br />

With few exceptions, ice particles growing to visible size evaporate within ~6h of<br />

observation, since they sediment to warmer regions <strong>an</strong>d evaporate quickly once there. Thus,<br />

ice particle lifetime is almost entirely determined by the time the NLC particles take to grow<br />

to visible size.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!