01.03.2013 Views

scostep 2010 (stp12) - Leibniz-Institut für Atmosphärenphysik an der ...

scostep 2010 (stp12) - Leibniz-Institut für Atmosphärenphysik an der ...

scostep 2010 (stp12) - Leibniz-Institut für Atmosphärenphysik an der ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

STP12 Abstracts<br />

Berlin, 12 - 16 July <strong>2010</strong><br />

SCOSTEP Symposium <strong>2010</strong><br />

The role of gravity wave effects <strong>an</strong>d stratospheric sudden warmings in modelling solar<br />

signal propagation<br />

Cnossen Ingrid 1 , Lu Hua 1 , Bell Christopher 2 , Gray Lesley 2<br />

1 British Antarctic Survey, 2 University of Reading<br />

We used a troposphere-stratosphere model of intermediate complexity to study the<br />

atmospheric response to <strong>an</strong> idealized solar forcing in the subtropical upper stratosphere in<br />

early winter. Our <strong>an</strong>alysis focuses on the poleward <strong>an</strong>d downward propagation of the solar<br />

signal in the northern hemisphere, <strong>an</strong>d we investigate two conditions that could influence this<br />

propagation: 1) the type of representation of gravity wave effects in the model, <strong>an</strong>d 2) the<br />

presence or absence of Stratospheric Sudden Warming (SSW) events. Two sets of simulations<br />

were performed: one with a traditional Rayleigh friction representation of gravity wave<br />

effects (RF), <strong>an</strong>d <strong>an</strong>other with a Holton-Lindzen-type gravity wave scheme (GWS). Both<br />

control simulations produce similar climatologies, but subst<strong>an</strong>tially different distributions of<br />

SSW events, with the GWS distribution being most realistic. For the same forcing in the<br />

subtropical upper stratosphere, larger <strong>an</strong>d longer-lasting responses, which propagated further<br />

poleward <strong>an</strong>d downward, were obtained when the gravity wave scheme was used. The GWS<br />

version of the model thus has a higher sensitivity to external forcing th<strong>an</strong> the RF version.<br />

When years with SSWs during early winter are excluded, the GWS results show <strong>an</strong> enh<strong>an</strong>ced<br />

signal in the troposphere, which appears to be not directly connected to signals in the<br />

stratosphere, while signals appear to propagate more directly into the troposphere when<br />

examining SSW years only. This suggests that different mech<strong>an</strong>isms of tropospherestratosphere<br />

coupling are active during disturbed (with SSW) <strong>an</strong>d undisturbed (without SSW)<br />

conditions.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!