Written Answers to Questions - Northern Ireland Assembly
Written Answers to Questions - Northern Ireland Assembly
Written Answers to Questions - Northern Ireland Assembly
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Friday 20 July 2012 <strong>Written</strong> <strong>Answers</strong><br />
a revised management regime for Strangford Lough <strong>to</strong> allow a level of pot fishing <strong>to</strong> continue while<br />
meeting the obligations under Habitats Directive were discussed, including various ways <strong>to</strong> achieve this.<br />
I, of course, am available <strong>to</strong> meet and have done so previously.<br />
Reducing Litter Levels<br />
Mr Lyttle asked the Minister of the Environment what action the <strong>Northern</strong> <strong>Ireland</strong> Environment Agency<br />
is taking <strong>to</strong> reduce the level of litter and anti-social behaviour at Struell Wells, Downpatrick.<br />
(AQW 12994/11-15)<br />
Mr Attwood: Whilst NIEA can take corrective action, the litter is left by the public and it is their<br />
irresponsible behaviour which creates the problem. NIEA will seek <strong>to</strong> increase the frequency of site<br />
patrols at Struell Wells and is reviewing the access arrangements at this monument <strong>to</strong> discourage<br />
anti-social behaviour.<br />
NIEA encourages the visiting public <strong>to</strong> behave responsibly at all its properties and supports the Leave<br />
No Trace campaign.<br />
Litter and Anti-Social Behaviour in Inch Abbey<br />
Mr Lyttle asked the Minister of the Environment what action the <strong>Northern</strong> <strong>Ireland</strong> Environment Agency<br />
is taking <strong>to</strong> reduce the level of litter and anti-social behaviour at Inch Abbey, Downpatrick.<br />
(AQW 12995/11-15)<br />
Mr Attwood: Whilst NIEA can take corrective action, the litter is left by the public and it is their<br />
irresponsible behaviour which creates the problem. NIEA will seek <strong>to</strong> increase the frequency of site<br />
patrols at Inch Abbey and is reviewing the access arrangements at this monument <strong>to</strong> discourage antisocial<br />
behaviour.<br />
NIEA encourages the visiting public <strong>to</strong> behave responsibly at all its properties and supports the Leave<br />
No Trace campaign.<br />
Drug Driving<br />
Mr Weir asked the Minister of the Environment what discussions he has held with the UK Government<br />
<strong>to</strong> ensure that legislation and penalties for drug-driving are consistent across the United Kingdom.<br />
(AQW 13007/11-15)<br />
Mr Attwood: Legislation here is broadly in line with Britain and it is currently illegal <strong>to</strong> drive whilst<br />
impaired through drink or drugs. However, that legislation requires the police and courts <strong>to</strong> both prove<br />
the presence of the in<strong>to</strong>xicant and also demonstrate impairment in each case before a driver could be<br />
prosecuted. The legislation in <strong>Ireland</strong> is similar, with prosecution depending on proof of impairment.<br />
New British legislation is being progressed <strong>to</strong> make driving or being in charge of a mo<strong>to</strong>r vehicle with<br />
concentration of specified controlled drug above specified limit an offence without a need <strong>to</strong> prove<br />
impairment, bringing drug driving in<strong>to</strong> line with drink driving in this regard. As you might be aware this<br />
legislation, consideration of which is included in our Road Safety Strategy, is currently progressing<br />
through the House of Lords.<br />
The legislation as drafted would mean that a person would be committing an offence simply by having a<br />
specified level of a specified drug in their body. It identifies that both the drugs and the relevant limits<br />
would be specified by regulation and includes the option for any specified limit <strong>to</strong> be zero. Offenders<br />
could face a ban of at least 12 months, a fine of up <strong>to</strong> £5,000 and up <strong>to</strong> 51 weeks in jail (6 months in<br />
Scotland) for driving with specified drugs in the body in excess of specified limits.<br />
A scientific review panel is considering the scientific underpinning for the new law, assessing the<br />
effects on driving of different drugs. The drugs ultimately specified by the offence and the specified<br />
WA 524