CROWD CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES - Omega Research Foundation
CROWD CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES - Omega Research Foundation
CROWD CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES - Omega Research Foundation
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
weapons. Appendix 6 catalogues some cases where disabling chemicals were used to incapacitate a<br />
target prior to executing, wounding or beating the victim in a manner where a whole community was<br />
punished indiscriminately by blanket gassing.<br />
Targets have included hospitals where victims have no means of escaping the build up of toxic gas.<br />
Such practices were for example common in the late 1980s, in the Occupied Territories. 273 However,<br />
as detailed in Appendix 6, far too often disabling chemicals are used to expel civilians from safe<br />
sanctuary to enable their beating, wounding or extra-judicial execution. Anyone trapped or injured will<br />
be vulnerable. 274 (Also, see case examples in Section 8)<br />
5.2 Kinetic Weapons.<br />
Systematic misuse of truncheons has almost become a metaphor of the archetypal repressive<br />
police state. 275 Modern kinetic energy weapons have also been systematically abused, particularly in<br />
Northern Ireland, the Occupied Territories and South Africa in a wide range of ways including: i)<br />
doctoring of projectiles to enhance lethality; 276 ii) breaching of guidelines on:- use only as a last resort<br />
277 , firing below the minimum distance 278 , firing at areas of the body that should not be targeted (ie<br />
head, face, neck or chest) 279 shot out of moving vehicles 280 ; iii) used as street punishment for example<br />
during zone clearing operations, 281 iv) intimidation, 282 v) denial of the right to peaceful protest 283 , vi)<br />
used in a sectarian or racist manner, 284 and vii) used as disproportionate and excessive force. 285<br />
(Figure 9 illustrates an the misuse of Kinetic Energy weapons against protestors in Seattle)<br />
Even when these weapons are used in a criminal way, for example when children are targeted<br />
leading to fears of street execution, the weapons leave no ballistic trail that could be used in an enquiry<br />
to trace the officers responsible. 286 A failure by the authorities to prosecute officers who use excessive<br />
force or who breach the guidelines has led to a culture of impunity, a disregard for the rules of law and<br />
made the use of these weapons ordinary instead of extra-ordinary. This is especially true in Northern<br />
Ireland 287 and Israel. 288 However whilst failing to prosecute the officers, governments have<br />
acknowledged the misuse of the weapons by offering financial compensation to victims and families,<br />
often on condition of secret payment and the cessation of any criminal charges being laid. 289 Such<br />
)cheque book litigation( has ensured that the full examination and public disclosure of the misuse of<br />
these weapons has been avoided by the authorities.<br />
5.3 Electro-shock weapon manufacturers and proponents cite the non-lethal characteristics of such<br />
weapons as reasons to deploy them instead of lethal force or other types of crowd control weapons<br />
such as blunt trauma batons. These characteristics include the claims that stun weapons are: nonlethal,<br />
do not cause blunt trauma injuries and leave no long-term physical effects. However, these<br />
characteristics are exactly those that have led human rights organisations and medical personnel<br />
helping to rehabilitate victims of torture to suggest that stun weapons have inherent characteristics that<br />
facilitate abuse, ill-treatment and torture. What makes the abusability factors with stun weapons so<br />
high is not just their apparent degree of unreliability, technical variability or very narrow safety range of<br />
the technology, but also the practical difficulty of finding evidence which proves they have been used to<br />
facilitate human rights violations.<br />
Due to her experience with victims who have been tortured with electro-shock weapons, the<br />
Director of the London-based, Medical <strong>Foundation</strong> for the Treatment and Rehabilitation of Torture<br />
Victims has described electro-shock batons as )the modern universal tool of the Torturer(. 290 The<br />
Executive Director of Amnesty International USA has highlighted the contradiction between the law<br />
enforcement use of stun weapons and their widespread use worldwide as instruments of torture and illtreatment.<br />
291 The potential for abuse has been also highlighted by other health professionals working<br />
in law enforcement and correctional services. 292<br />
xxxvi