20.03.2013 Views

CROWD CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES - Omega Research Foundation

CROWD CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES - Omega Research Foundation

CROWD CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES - Omega Research Foundation

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

weapons. Appendix 6 catalogues some cases where disabling chemicals were used to incapacitate a<br />

target prior to executing, wounding or beating the victim in a manner where a whole community was<br />

punished indiscriminately by blanket gassing.<br />

Targets have included hospitals where victims have no means of escaping the build up of toxic gas.<br />

Such practices were for example common in the late 1980s, in the Occupied Territories. 273 However,<br />

as detailed in Appendix 6, far too often disabling chemicals are used to expel civilians from safe<br />

sanctuary to enable their beating, wounding or extra-judicial execution. Anyone trapped or injured will<br />

be vulnerable. 274 (Also, see case examples in Section 8)<br />

5.2 Kinetic Weapons.<br />

Systematic misuse of truncheons has almost become a metaphor of the archetypal repressive<br />

police state. 275 Modern kinetic energy weapons have also been systematically abused, particularly in<br />

Northern Ireland, the Occupied Territories and South Africa in a wide range of ways including: i)<br />

doctoring of projectiles to enhance lethality; 276 ii) breaching of guidelines on:- use only as a last resort<br />

277 , firing below the minimum distance 278 , firing at areas of the body that should not be targeted (ie<br />

head, face, neck or chest) 279 shot out of moving vehicles 280 ; iii) used as street punishment for example<br />

during zone clearing operations, 281 iv) intimidation, 282 v) denial of the right to peaceful protest 283 , vi)<br />

used in a sectarian or racist manner, 284 and vii) used as disproportionate and excessive force. 285<br />

(Figure 9 illustrates an the misuse of Kinetic Energy weapons against protestors in Seattle)<br />

Even when these weapons are used in a criminal way, for example when children are targeted<br />

leading to fears of street execution, the weapons leave no ballistic trail that could be used in an enquiry<br />

to trace the officers responsible. 286 A failure by the authorities to prosecute officers who use excessive<br />

force or who breach the guidelines has led to a culture of impunity, a disregard for the rules of law and<br />

made the use of these weapons ordinary instead of extra-ordinary. This is especially true in Northern<br />

Ireland 287 and Israel. 288 However whilst failing to prosecute the officers, governments have<br />

acknowledged the misuse of the weapons by offering financial compensation to victims and families,<br />

often on condition of secret payment and the cessation of any criminal charges being laid. 289 Such<br />

)cheque book litigation( has ensured that the full examination and public disclosure of the misuse of<br />

these weapons has been avoided by the authorities.<br />

5.3 Electro-shock weapon manufacturers and proponents cite the non-lethal characteristics of such<br />

weapons as reasons to deploy them instead of lethal force or other types of crowd control weapons<br />

such as blunt trauma batons. These characteristics include the claims that stun weapons are: nonlethal,<br />

do not cause blunt trauma injuries and leave no long-term physical effects. However, these<br />

characteristics are exactly those that have led human rights organisations and medical personnel<br />

helping to rehabilitate victims of torture to suggest that stun weapons have inherent characteristics that<br />

facilitate abuse, ill-treatment and torture. What makes the abusability factors with stun weapons so<br />

high is not just their apparent degree of unreliability, technical variability or very narrow safety range of<br />

the technology, but also the practical difficulty of finding evidence which proves they have been used to<br />

facilitate human rights violations.<br />

Due to her experience with victims who have been tortured with electro-shock weapons, the<br />

Director of the London-based, Medical <strong>Foundation</strong> for the Treatment and Rehabilitation of Torture<br />

Victims has described electro-shock batons as )the modern universal tool of the Torturer(. 290 The<br />

Executive Director of Amnesty International USA has highlighted the contradiction between the law<br />

enforcement use of stun weapons and their widespread use worldwide as instruments of torture and illtreatment.<br />

291 The potential for abuse has been also highlighted by other health professionals working<br />

in law enforcement and correctional services. 292<br />

xxxvi

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!