CROWD CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES - Omega Research Foundation

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Chemical Name and Formula Munition Plastic Bullet )Cross Cartridge( Flash Ball Jelly Baton Flexible Baton Bean Bag )Cease and Desist( Rubber baton slug Slingshot Bullet Machine MR 35 Punch Spherical Ball 55mm Rubber Bullet Kraken 59mm Short Name TABLE 1. THE MAIN CHEMICAL IRRITANT RIOT <strong>CONTROL</strong> GASES Form Melting Point / C lxiv Stability / Solubility Effects include headaches, mental depression, chills, abdominal cramps, vomiting, diarrhea lasting several hours TABLE 2: COMPARATIVE EFFECTS OF VARIOUS LESS LETHAL KINETIC IMPACT MUNITIONS Manufacturer Royal Ordnance Heckler and Koch Verney Carron Crown Aircartridge MK Ballistic Systems MK Ballistics Milstor Corporation Fiocchi TFM Manurhin SNPE SNPE Policske Strojirny Country UK Germany France Netherlands USA USA USA USA South Africa France France France Poland Projectile weight / g 135 179 28 N/A 40 40 N/A 4.5 107 21 1355 46 56 Range / m 25-60 36462 12 N/A N/A 36462 Less than 18 15-40 175 max Up to 10 more than 30 10 - 30 50 Relative Power Impact Energy/ Joules 150-210 424 above 200 at muzzle 425 200 at 7m 426 265 427 163 428 120 429 130 at 10m 430 ICt50 (mg.min/m 3 ) 120 at muzzle, 77 at 10m 431 205 at muzzle 432 150-200 433 630 at muzzle, 150 at 30m 434 240 at muzzle, 45 at 30m 435 227 at 30m 436
Munition Arwen AR-1 TABLE 2: COMPARATIVE EFFECTS OF VARIOUS LESS LETHAL KINETIC IMPACT MUNITIONS Manufacturer Royal Ordnance lxv Country UK Projectile weight / g 79.4 Range / m 20-100 Impact Energy/ Joules 220 at muzzle, 70 at 30m 437 Impact energy: - below 20.3 Joules (15 foot lbs) is described as safe or low hazard, provided the projectile is large enough not to damage the eyes; - between 40.7 - 122 Joules (30 and 90 foot pounds) is described as a dangerous area for impact energy - above 122 Joules (90 foot pounds) is described as being in the severe damage region (From: Egner, D.O. et al (1973) A multi disciplinary technique for the evaluation of less lethal weapons Vol 1'. US Department of Justice. Impact energies in the table are given at the range (in metres) for that projectile, unless otherwise stated.
Page 1 and 2:
CROWD CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES (An appr
Page 3 and 4:
)Crowd Control Technologies : An As
Page 5 and 6:
)Crowd Control Technologies - An As
Page 7 and 8:
It is recommended that new limits s
Page 9 and 10:
Diversity Project), is already open
Page 11 and 12:
guarantees are forthcoming both fro
Page 13 and 14:
No 1. 2. 2.1 2.1.1 2.1.2 2.2 2.2.1
Page 15 and 16:
No 5 5.1 5.2 5.3 6 6.1 6.2 6.3 6.3.
Page 18 and 19:
An Assessment Of Crowd Control Tech
Page 20 and 21:
[15] Any European wide adoption of
Page 22 and 23:
NEW BIO-WEAPONS FOR CROWD CONTROL [
Page 24 and 25:
than war in Bosnia, Somalia and Kos
Page 26 and 27:
Most of these crowd control weapons
Page 28 and 29:
CR was first synthesized by Higginb
Page 30 and 31: and some speciality ones. These inc
Page 32 and 33: Some Examples of Currently Availabl
Page 34 and 35: 3.2 The International Committee Of
Page 36 and 37: coercion to a greater number of peo
Page 38 and 39: Fig 5. Severe blistering following
Page 40 and 41: currently available is not sufficie
Page 42 and 43: 4.1.4 Hazards Of Pyrotechnic & Blas
Page 44 and 45: on particular parts of the human bo
Page 46 and 47: Fig 6. Modern Israeli pulsed jet Wa
Page 48 and 49: Severe skull damage caused by Kinet
Page 50 and 51: The report also stated that )these
Page 52 and 53: cultures. This process is perhaps m
Page 54 and 55: Fig. 9. Police officer targets WTO
Page 56 and 57: Electro-shock weapons have been del
Page 58 and 59: xlii
Page 60 and 61: xliv
Page 62 and 63: + )Neither the existence, the prese
Page 64 and 65: Some Examples of 2 nd Generation No
Page 66 and 67: 6.3.1 Calmatives The human brain ha
Page 68 and 69: By 1994 this work was well on its w
Page 70 and 71: Therefore it does not come as a sur
Page 72 and 73: the bottle, there is still time for
Page 74 and 75: used CS gas to literally fumigate a
Page 76 and 77: poor records of human rights violat
Page 78 and 79: water cannon were identified as Mer
Page 82 and 83: NOTES & REFERENCES 1. See Action pl
Page 84 and 85: Avnon and Beit Alfa (Israel), Custo
Page 86 and 87: Company Brochure, April 1996. 43. L
Page 88 and 89: 67. In the SIPRI Yearbook 1998, pag
Page 90 and 91: 82. Chung, C.W., Giles, A.L. (1972)
Page 92 and 93: 105. McNamara, B.P., Rennie, R.A.,
Page 94 and 95: 130. For example one study using a
Page 96 and 97: The Police Authority of Northern Ir
Page 98 and 99: 173. Statewatch Bulletin (1996). Br
Page 100 and 101: 195. Eg the Armortek water cannon o
Page 102 and 103: 222. http://www.zarc.com/english/ne
Page 104 and 105: 241. OBrien, D. (1991). Op. cit. 24
Page 106 and 107: 260. The isopropyl alcohol used in
Page 108 and 109: 276. Numerous reports from Northern
Page 110 and 111: 285. For example, )using tear gas,
Page 112 and 113: 300. Human Rights Watch (1997) Turk
Page 114 and 115: 312. Aftergood, S. (1994)The Soft-k
Page 116 and 117: low.( New )candidate immobilizers(
Page 118 and 119: 360. See Business Wire (1999) Battl
Page 120 and 121: 380. These crimes have emerged duri
Page 122 and 123: US Clearing Dest: Foreign Port Dest
Page 124 and 125: Mr. Fatchett: In accordance with th
Page 126 and 127: telephone the police. She remembere
show all

CROWD CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES - Omega Research Foundation

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?