20.03.2013 Views

CROWD CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES - Omega Research Foundation

CROWD CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES - Omega Research Foundation

CROWD CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES - Omega Research Foundation

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

distance to create muscle paralysis or tetanization. 348 A fully working prototype is still some way off but<br />

the principle has been successfully tested using a Lumonics Hyper-X 400 excimer laser at the<br />

University of California at San Diego. 349<br />

Other Directed Energy Weapons are being explored. For example in 1997, Edward Scannel of the<br />

US Army Laboratory identified a Vortex Ring Gun which is a combustion Ring Gun creating vortices for<br />

impulse or chemical delivery and a range of high powered acoustic technology. 350 The literature talks of<br />

acoustic bullets, beams and blastwave projectors. Comments on acoustic weapons have suggested<br />

they can be tunable radiating a directed energy beam of 90-120 decibels to provide anything from<br />

extreme levels of annoyance and distraction through to 140-150 decibels for )strong physical bodily<br />

trauma and damage to tissues( to shockwave levels of more than 170 decibels )producing<br />

instantaneous blastwave like trauma which could be lethal. 351 The current leader in acoustic<br />

technology in the US is a small company in Huntington Beach, California called Scientific Applications<br />

and <strong>Research</strong> Associates which is reported to have made vortices which are capable of providing an<br />

area denial function. 352<br />

However, despite the claims of powerful infra-sound weapons capable of making people sick and<br />

causing involuntary defecation, a presentation by Jurgen Altman of the University of Dortmund at the<br />

1999 Janes conference, Fielding Weapons for the New Millennium said such claims were based on<br />

Physics not as we know it. In a more detailed technical study Altman provides a tightly argued case for<br />

doubting the technical workability of such weapons over longer distances. At shorter distances with<br />

explosive driven strong sound blast waves there would be a case for including such weapons within the<br />

SIrUS criteria of banning weapons which target a particular aspect of human anatomy. 353<br />

The most controversial non-lethal crowd control and anti-materiel technology proposed by the US<br />

are so called Radio Frequency or Directed Energy Weapons that can allegedly manipulate human<br />

behaviour in a variety of unusual ways. Some microwave systems have been proposed which can raise<br />

body temperature to between 105 to 107 degrees F, to provide a disabling effect in a manner based on<br />

the microwave cooker principle. However, the greatest concern is with systems which can directly<br />

interact with the human nervous system. There are many reports on so called psychotronic weapons<br />

which are beyond the brief of this study but one comment can be made. 354 The research undertaken todate<br />

both in the US and in Russia can be divided into two related areas: (i) individual mind control and<br />

(ii) crowd control. That the US has undertaken a variety of mind control programmes in the past such<br />

as MkULTRA and MkDELTA is a matter of public record and those using electromagnetic radiation<br />

such as PANDORA have been the focus of researchers in para-politics for many years. 355 More<br />

recently, authors such as Begich and Roderick have alleged significant breakthroughs in the ability of<br />

military high frequency electromagnetic technologies to manipulate human behaviour. 356<br />

What is admitted by the military authorities in the US is that research programmes using so called<br />

directed energy weapons for anti-personnel and anti-material purposes are proceeding into prototype<br />

stages 357 . The military utility of these weapons is that they provide a tunable or rheostat ability a )need(<br />

that is emerging as part of the new US military intervention doctrine of so called layered defence. This<br />

means in practice an )onion style( of risk where anyone coming into contact with the outer shell may be<br />

sickened, paralysed. Entering subsequent levels may lead to being physically harmed, disabled or<br />

permanently maimed whilst the core of the zone is protected by lethal technology, contact with which is<br />

fatal.<br />

6.3.5 Area Denial Munitions - are victim initiated technologies which have in the past been used at<br />

borders and along the perimeters of control zones to prevent entry or exit. At the 1997 Janes NLW<br />

conference, the systems manager for the US non-lethal material programe, Hilda Libby, advocated a<br />

range of such technologies to insert into existing weapons platforms including many area denial<br />

munitions. 358 The US has said that it will not sign the Landmines Treaty until 2006 when there are nonlethal<br />

alternatives.<br />

liii

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!