CROWD CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES - Omega Research Foundation
CROWD CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES - Omega Research Foundation
CROWD CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES - Omega Research Foundation
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
distance to create muscle paralysis or tetanization. 348 A fully working prototype is still some way off but<br />
the principle has been successfully tested using a Lumonics Hyper-X 400 excimer laser at the<br />
University of California at San Diego. 349<br />
Other Directed Energy Weapons are being explored. For example in 1997, Edward Scannel of the<br />
US Army Laboratory identified a Vortex Ring Gun which is a combustion Ring Gun creating vortices for<br />
impulse or chemical delivery and a range of high powered acoustic technology. 350 The literature talks of<br />
acoustic bullets, beams and blastwave projectors. Comments on acoustic weapons have suggested<br />
they can be tunable radiating a directed energy beam of 90-120 decibels to provide anything from<br />
extreme levels of annoyance and distraction through to 140-150 decibels for )strong physical bodily<br />
trauma and damage to tissues( to shockwave levels of more than 170 decibels )producing<br />
instantaneous blastwave like trauma which could be lethal. 351 The current leader in acoustic<br />
technology in the US is a small company in Huntington Beach, California called Scientific Applications<br />
and <strong>Research</strong> Associates which is reported to have made vortices which are capable of providing an<br />
area denial function. 352<br />
However, despite the claims of powerful infra-sound weapons capable of making people sick and<br />
causing involuntary defecation, a presentation by Jurgen Altman of the University of Dortmund at the<br />
1999 Janes conference, Fielding Weapons for the New Millennium said such claims were based on<br />
Physics not as we know it. In a more detailed technical study Altman provides a tightly argued case for<br />
doubting the technical workability of such weapons over longer distances. At shorter distances with<br />
explosive driven strong sound blast waves there would be a case for including such weapons within the<br />
SIrUS criteria of banning weapons which target a particular aspect of human anatomy. 353<br />
The most controversial non-lethal crowd control and anti-materiel technology proposed by the US<br />
are so called Radio Frequency or Directed Energy Weapons that can allegedly manipulate human<br />
behaviour in a variety of unusual ways. Some microwave systems have been proposed which can raise<br />
body temperature to between 105 to 107 degrees F, to provide a disabling effect in a manner based on<br />
the microwave cooker principle. However, the greatest concern is with systems which can directly<br />
interact with the human nervous system. There are many reports on so called psychotronic weapons<br />
which are beyond the brief of this study but one comment can be made. 354 The research undertaken todate<br />
both in the US and in Russia can be divided into two related areas: (i) individual mind control and<br />
(ii) crowd control. That the US has undertaken a variety of mind control programmes in the past such<br />
as MkULTRA and MkDELTA is a matter of public record and those using electromagnetic radiation<br />
such as PANDORA have been the focus of researchers in para-politics for many years. 355 More<br />
recently, authors such as Begich and Roderick have alleged significant breakthroughs in the ability of<br />
military high frequency electromagnetic technologies to manipulate human behaviour. 356<br />
What is admitted by the military authorities in the US is that research programmes using so called<br />
directed energy weapons for anti-personnel and anti-material purposes are proceeding into prototype<br />
stages 357 . The military utility of these weapons is that they provide a tunable or rheostat ability a )need(<br />
that is emerging as part of the new US military intervention doctrine of so called layered defence. This<br />
means in practice an )onion style( of risk where anyone coming into contact with the outer shell may be<br />
sickened, paralysed. Entering subsequent levels may lead to being physically harmed, disabled or<br />
permanently maimed whilst the core of the zone is protected by lethal technology, contact with which is<br />
fatal.<br />
6.3.5 Area Denial Munitions - are victim initiated technologies which have in the past been used at<br />
borders and along the perimeters of control zones to prevent entry or exit. At the 1997 Janes NLW<br />
conference, the systems manager for the US non-lethal material programe, Hilda Libby, advocated a<br />
range of such technologies to insert into existing weapons platforms including many area denial<br />
munitions. 358 The US has said that it will not sign the Landmines Treaty until 2006 when there are nonlethal<br />
alternatives.<br />
liii