CROWD CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES - Omega Research Foundation
CROWD CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES - Omega Research Foundation
CROWD CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES - Omega Research Foundation
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
the bottle, there is still time for the European Union to develop consistent and appropriate structures of<br />
accountability. Pugwash considered that )each of the emerging less-lethal weapons technologies<br />
required urgent examination and that their development or adoption should be subject to public<br />
review(. 376 The process should be transparent, adaptable and open to public and political scrutiny.<br />
Any class of technology shown to be excessively injurious, cruel, inhumane or indiscriminate, should be<br />
either prohibited or subject to stringent and democratic controls.<br />
7. AN APPRAISAL OF LESS DAMAGING ALTERNATIVES.<br />
7.1 Crowd Control Technologies and Social Contexts. From the arguments presented above, it is<br />
clear that the innovation, deployment and overall accountability regarding the use of crowd control<br />
weapons in Europe is inconsistent and subject to differing levels of both regulation and control. There<br />
are tremendous commercial pressures coming from crowd control weapon manufacturers urging<br />
governments to buy newer, more advanced forms of crowd control technology. Nowhere is this more<br />
apparent than in the United States, where the wild west gun culture yields 30,000 murders each year<br />
and over 100,000 people injured by gunshot wounds. 377 Much of this American crowd control<br />
technology overlaps with new US military non lethal technologies and consequentially developments<br />
within NATO. Thus the new NATO doctrine about using so called non-lethal warfare now means<br />
civilians and combatants are intentionally targeted with the same weaponry. Some of these are claimed<br />
to be less damaging but how can we know?<br />
It is obvious that America has peculiar problems associated with the prevalence of firearms<br />
amongst the citizenry under rights guaranteed by their constitution. Although US police have been<br />
shown to be more than capable of misusing riot weapons when used against crowds such as the WTO<br />
demonstrations held in Seattle in November 1999, it is undeniable that US police officers do have to<br />
deal with armed hostage and barricade situations on a daily basis. In those situations, the use of lessthan<br />
lethal weapons may be an entirely appropriate alternative to the use of lethal firearms. 378<br />
However, it is questionable whether European police forces would, or should, want to import the<br />
)gangster cop( mentality that has accompanied some of the tactics evolved in the US to deal with this<br />
level of violent behaviour. What are the alternatives? In many respects, the United States is oddly<br />
insular and inward looking. It is hard to think of a European Member State where such a large<br />
proportion of the population does not possess a passport, which is reportedly the situation in America.<br />
Outside of the present Austrian government 379 most Europeans would find it inconceivable that<br />
constitutional rights could protect racist and xenophobic propaganda as freedoms of speech, as they<br />
are in the US under the 1st Amendment. Racist policing can become systemic without appropriate<br />
accountability. A serious lack of police accountability has allowed certain officers from forces such as<br />
the Los Angeles Police Department to shoot innocent citizens, plant evidence, engage in bank robbery,<br />
rape, practice interrogation methods that have been categorised as torture and award each other<br />
celebratory plaques for certain kinds of killings. 380<br />
Thankfully, this is not civilisation as we know it - yet. There are good reasons for drawing back from<br />
the notion that Corporate America should programme European policing methods for crowd control,<br />
which it will if the status quo regarding the acquisition and deployment of crowd control weapons is<br />
allowed to continue in the current under-questioned, under-managed, under-licensed, under-regulated<br />
and under-accountable manner. This is not to suggest the issue of crowd control weapons is without<br />
complexity. What this study does assert is that the dangers of such weaponry being used to undermine<br />
)due process( are so high, given the second generation of products now entering service in the USA,<br />
that a certain degree of circumspections is required.<br />
7.2 The Need for Social Impact Assessments. Before the advent of Rachel Carsons classic book<br />
Silent Spring, 381 the tremendous impact that industrial and pesticide pollutants were having on the<br />
environment and our food chain were simply not realized. One early response of that awareness of the<br />
unforseen social impacts of science and technology was the US Congress setting up the forerunner to<br />
lvi