22.03.2013 Views

NHS pay review body: twenty-sixth report 2012 - Official Documents

NHS pay review body: twenty-sixth report 2012 - Official Documents

NHS pay review body: twenty-sixth report 2012 - Official Documents

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Chapter 1 – Introduction and Background<br />

Introduction<br />

1.1<br />

1.2<br />

Our remit for <strong>2012</strong>/13 continues to be constrained by the UK Government’s<br />

and Devolved Administrations’ public sector <strong>pay</strong> policies. The second year of the<br />

Governments’ public sector <strong>pay</strong> policies is the same as the first in that it narrows our<br />

remit to consideration of <strong>pay</strong> recommendations for <strong>NHS</strong> Agenda for Change (AfC) staff<br />

earning £21,000 or less and any cases presented on high cost area supplements (HCAS)<br />

and recruitment and retention premia (RRP). We consider the evidence against this remit<br />

and also with reference to our standing terms of reference as set out at the front of this<br />

<strong>report</strong>.<br />

The detailed remit for <strong>2012</strong>/13 was set out in letters from the Chief Secretary to<br />

the Treasury, the Secretary of State for Health and the Ministers in the Devolved<br />

Administrations. This <strong>report</strong> examines the evidence presented by the parties on the<br />

specific requirement to consider AfC staff paid £21,000 or less and the <strong>pay</strong> proposals<br />

made by the parties. Our remit also allowed us to consider information about<br />

recruitment, retention and other aspects of the <strong>NHS</strong> workforce for those paid above<br />

£21,000.<br />

Twenty-Fifth Report 2011 1<br />

1.3<br />

We submitted our Twenty-Fifth Report on 11 March 2011 to the Prime Minister, Secretary<br />

of State for Health and the relevant Ministers for the Devolved Administrations. Our<br />

<strong>report</strong> was made in the context of the first year of the UK Government’s and Devolved<br />

Administrations’ policies of a public sector <strong>pay</strong> freeze for those earning more than<br />

£21,000. Within this constrained remit, we recommended an uplift of £250 to AfC spine<br />

points 1 to 15 from 1 April 2011. On 21 March 2011, the UK Government announced<br />

its acceptance of our recommendations and conclusions in full2 . Shortly afterwards, the<br />

Devolved Administrations also confirmed their acceptance of our <strong>report</strong>.<br />

Remit for our Twenty-Sixth Report<br />

1.4<br />

1.5<br />

1.6<br />

We set out the background to the UK Government’s and Devolved Administrations’<br />

approach to public sector <strong>pay</strong> in our Twenty-Fifth Report3 covering the context of the<br />

Coalition Government’s programme for government, the Spending Review 2010 and the<br />

detail of our remit for the first year of the public sector <strong>pay</strong> policies.<br />

The second year of the four Governments’ policies determined our remit for this <strong>pay</strong><br />

round. The Chief Secretary to the Treasury wrote to all Review Body Chairs on 20 June<br />

2011 setting out how the UK Government proposed that the Review Bodies should<br />

approach the round. The UK Government continued to consider that the case for <strong>pay</strong><br />

restraint across the public sector remained strong. The Chief Secretary to the Treasury<br />

added that at the highest level, while the UK Government recognised some variation<br />

between remit groups, it considered there were unlikely to be significant recruitment and<br />

retention issues for the majority of public sector workers over the next year. With regard<br />

to affordability, the UK Government considered <strong>pay</strong> restraint remained a crucial part of<br />

the consolidation plans helping to put the UK back onto the path of fiscal sustainability.<br />

The letter outlined the UK Government’s view that this <strong>pay</strong> round should proceed in<br />

line with that for 2011/12 with the Review Bodies making recommendations in relation<br />

to those workers earning £21,000 or less. The Chief Secretary to the Treasury defined<br />

1 <strong>NHS</strong>PRB (2011), Twenty-Fifth Report, TSO (Cm 8029).<br />

2 Written Ministerial Statement, Secretary of State for Health, 21 March 2011 (Hansard Column 43WS).<br />

3 <strong>NHS</strong>PRB (2011), Twenty-Fifth Report, TSO (Cm 8029), paragraphs 1.4 – 1.10.<br />

1

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!