NHS pay review body: twenty-sixth report 2012 - Official Documents
NHS pay review body: twenty-sixth report 2012 - Official Documents
NHS pay review body: twenty-sixth report 2012 - Official Documents
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
56<br />
the training and development requirements to maximise the midwifery contribution in<br />
future. SHAs were <strong>review</strong>ing the supply of local midwives, including attrition rates from<br />
training, and were developing appropriate recruitment, retention and return strategies.<br />
Our Comment<br />
4.52 We noted in our Twenty-Fifth Report the RCM’s concerns about the shortages of <strong>NHS</strong><br />
midwives. We are grateful for the further analysis by the RCM and the Department of<br />
Health’s commentary on the activity underway to manage the midwifery workforce.<br />
We consider this an issue largely of supply – specifically the accurate assessment of the<br />
numbers of midwives required, the impact of <strong>NHS</strong> reforms in England on these workforce<br />
requirements and determining the required level of training commissions. We conclude<br />
from the evidence that further action is needed to manage more effectively workforce<br />
and training planning to ensure an adequate supply of midwives in the right locations. At<br />
this stage, the evidence does not point to widespread national recruitment and retention<br />
problems which require a national <strong>pay</strong> response. However, we remind employers that,<br />
where local recruitment and retention difficulties are experienced, local RRP can be used<br />
when supported by robust evidence that a <strong>pay</strong> solution is required.