NHS pay review body: twenty-sixth report 2012 - Official Documents
NHS pay review body: twenty-sixth report 2012 - Official Documents
NHS pay review body: twenty-sixth report 2012 - Official Documents
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Our Comment<br />
5.34 From the evidence we received for this <strong>report</strong> it is clear that morale and motivation<br />
across the <strong>NHS</strong> workforce is threatened by a variety of factors. These factors are largely<br />
driven, on the one hand, by local pressures stemming from budgetary constraints,<br />
service reconfigurations, rising workload, vacancy freezes, and job security; and on<br />
the other hand, from national developments such as the <strong>NHS</strong> reforms in England, the<br />
four Governments’ public sector <strong>pay</strong> policies, and proposed changes to public sector<br />
pensions.<br />
5.35 We note that the <strong>NHS</strong> Staff Survey provided by the Department of Health provided a<br />
more positive conclusion on staff morale and motivation but these views were sought<br />
between September and December 2010. In contrast, the Staff Side attached a high<br />
priority to maintaining morale and motivation and highlighted worrying trends in<br />
individual union surveys regarding their decline in the <strong>NHS</strong> workforce. They could<br />
present significant challenges to employers in meeting demand for quality services and<br />
delivering on the wide-ranging change agenda, plus they could threaten longer term<br />
recruitment and retention.<br />
5.36 In this respect, we consider staff engagement by employers to be an essential component<br />
of maintaining staff morale and motivation. The importance of engagement was raised<br />
several times when we met AfC staff during our 2011 visits. We observed some good<br />
examples of management practice which engaged staff to make effective changes. We<br />
encourage employers to give priority to staff engagement on a range of current issues<br />
so that staff can see that their contribution is valued thereby improving morale and<br />
motivation.<br />
Workforce Planning<br />
4 5.37 We commented in our Twenty-Fifth Report that it was important that wider <strong>NHS</strong> reforms<br />
were not allowed to fragment the way in which information on workforce requirements<br />
was gathered at a local level leading to imbalances between supply and demand. The<br />
parties provided further information on this issue.<br />
Information from the Parties<br />
The Health Departments<br />
5.38 The Department of Health told us that, under the reforms for England, the UK<br />
Government’s vision was for a provider-led workforce planning, education and<br />
training system in which the professions would have a leading role and would work<br />
with employers to ensure a multi-disciplinary approach. Following consultation on its<br />
proposals, the Department commented that the new framework would see healthcare<br />
providers, with their clinical leadership, taking a lead role in planning and developing<br />
their workforce.<br />
5.39 The Department considered the new system would: provide security of supply;<br />
be responsive to patient need and changing service models; deliver continuous<br />
improvement in the quality of education and training; and ensure value for money.<br />
The Department added that effective workforce planning was key to delivering the<br />
right workforce to deliver the UK Government’s vision. It considered that information<br />
and analysis from the Centre for Workforce Intelligence (CfWI) would support <strong>NHS</strong><br />
organisations in their workforce planning and assist them in taking a long range<br />
approach to improving skills and resources.<br />
4 <strong>NHS</strong>PRB (2011) Twenty-Fifth Report, TSO (Cm 8029), paragraph 5.27.<br />
63