22.03.2013 Views

NHS pay review body: twenty-sixth report 2012 - Official Documents

NHS pay review body: twenty-sixth report 2012 - Official Documents

NHS pay review body: twenty-sixth report 2012 - Official Documents

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Chapter 4 – High Cost Area Supplements and Recruitment and<br />

Retention Premia<br />

Introduction<br />

4.1<br />

44<br />

The Secretary of State’s remit letter confirmed that the Department of Health would<br />

provide evidence, as necessary, on high cost area supplements (HCAS) and recruitment<br />

and retention premia (RRP). Our role under the Agenda for Change (AfC) Agreement<br />

requires us to consider any new cases for HCAS and national RRP.<br />

High Cost Area Supplements<br />

4.2<br />

4.3<br />

Our terms of reference state that we should have regard to regional/local variations in<br />

labour markets and their effects on the recruitment and retention of staff. Under AfC,<br />

high cost area supplements are in place for Inner London, Outer London and the Fringe<br />

with the supplement values based on a percentage of individuals’ salary, with a minimum<br />

and maximum cash <strong>pay</strong>ment. The percentages, minima and maxima depend on the<br />

area, with Inner London attracting the highest supplement and the Fringe areas of<br />

London the lowest.<br />

There was no evidence presented on HCAS for this <strong>report</strong> and therefore we make no<br />

recommendations for any new supplements.<br />

National Recruitment and Retention Premia<br />

4.4<br />

4.5<br />

In evidence for this <strong>report</strong>, we received an application for a national RRP from the<br />

Union of Construction, Allied Trades and Technicians (UCATT) relating to building craft<br />

workers. We also received information from Unite relating to pharmacists for whom<br />

we highlighted some ongoing concerns in our Twenty-Fifth Report1 . In addition, the<br />

Royal College of Midwives asked us to keep newly qualified midwives under <strong>review</strong> for a<br />

national RRP.<br />

We <strong>review</strong> the evidence for each of these in later sections of this chapter. However, to<br />

ensure that the parties can present robust future evidence in support of any case for a<br />

national RRP, we summarise the provisions of the AfC Agreement and our approach as set<br />

out in our recent <strong>report</strong>s2 .<br />

AfC Agreement<br />

4.6<br />

3 The AfC Agreement provides for the operation of recruitment and retention premia<br />

designed to address labour market difficulties affecting specific occupational groups but<br />

applying to posts and not to individuals. Section 5 of the <strong>NHS</strong> Terms and Conditions<br />

Handbook states that RRP apply where market pressures would otherwise prevent the<br />

employer from being able to recruit staff to and retain staff in sufficient numbers for the<br />

posts concerned. The AfC Agreement allows premia to be awarded on a national basis<br />

to particular groups on our recommendation where there are national recruitment and<br />

retention pressures. The level of <strong>pay</strong>ment should be specified or, where the underlying<br />

problem is considered to vary across the country, guidance should be given to employers<br />

on the appropriate level of <strong>pay</strong>ment. In making such recommendations we are<br />

1 <strong>NHS</strong>PRB (2011), Twenty-Fifth Report, TSO (Cm 8029), paragraph 4.44.<br />

2 <strong>NHS</strong>PRB (2011), Twenty-Fifth Report, TSO (Cm 8029), paragraphs 4.4 – 4.8.<br />

3<br />

Section 5 and Annex R of <strong>NHS</strong> Staff Council <strong>NHS</strong> Terms and Conditions of Service Handbook (Amendment Number 24),<br />

Pay Circular (AforC) 3/2011.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!