23.03.2013 Views

CONTINUUM MECHANICS for ENGINEERS

CONTINUUM MECHANICS for ENGINEERS

CONTINUUM MECHANICS for ENGINEERS

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

is obtained by differentiating Eq 4.6-20a. There<strong>for</strong>e, to the first order of<br />

approximation <strong>for</strong> the case of small displacement gradients, it is unimportant<br />

whether we differentiate the displacement components with respect to the<br />

material or spatial coordinates. In view of this, we may display the equivalent<br />

relative displacement gradients <strong>for</strong> small de<strong>for</strong>mation theory as either u i,A<br />

or u i,j. Similarly, it can be shown that in the linear theory u A,B and u A,j are<br />

equivalent. It follows that to the same order of approximation, from Eqs 4.7-1<br />

and 4.7-2,<br />

(4.7-4)<br />

and it is customary to define a single infinitesimal strain tensor <strong>for</strong> which we<br />

introduce the symbol ε ij as<br />

∂u<br />

∂u<br />

∂u<br />

∂u<br />

i<br />

j<br />

i j<br />

2εij = δ δ<br />

(4.7-5)<br />

Aj + Bi = + = ui,j + uj,i<br />

∂X<br />

∂X<br />

∂x<br />

∂x<br />

Because the strain tensors E AB, e ij, and ε ij are all symmetric, second-order<br />

tensors, the entire development <strong>for</strong> principal strains, strain invariants, and<br />

principal strain directions may be carried out exactly as was done <strong>for</strong> the<br />

stress tensor in Chapter Three. Thus, taking ε ij as the typical tensor of the<br />

group, we summarize these results by displaying its matrix relative to principal<br />

axes in the alternative <strong>for</strong>ms,<br />

together with the strain invariants<br />

A<br />

E ≈ e δ δ<br />

AB ij iA jB<br />

I ε = ε ii = tr ε = ε I + ε II + ε III<br />

(4.7-6)<br />

(4.7-7a)<br />

II ε = (ε iiε jj – ε ijε ji) = ε Iε II + ε IIε III + ε IIIε I (4.7-7b)<br />

III ε = ε ijk ε 1iε 2jε 3k = ε Iε IIε III<br />

B<br />

ε(<br />

)<br />

ε<br />

* [ εij]<br />

ε(<br />

)<br />

ε<br />

ε(<br />

)<br />

ε<br />

=<br />

⎡<br />

⎤<br />

1 0 0 ⎡ I 0 0 ⎤<br />

⎢<br />

⎥ ⎢<br />

⎥<br />

⎢ 0 2 0 ⎥ =<br />

⎢<br />

0 II 0<br />

⎥<br />

⎢<br />

⎥<br />

⎣ 0 0 ⎦ ⎣<br />

⎢<br />

⎦<br />

⎥<br />

3 0 0 III<br />

1<br />

2<br />

(4.7-7c)<br />

The components of ε have specific physical interpretations which we now<br />

consider. Within the context of small de<strong>for</strong>mation theory we express<br />

Eq 4.6-14 in the modified <strong>for</strong>m<br />

j<br />

(dx) 2 – (dX) 2 = 2ε ijdX idX j = dX ⋅ 2ε ⋅ dX (4.7-8)<br />

i

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!