23.03.2013 Views

CONTINUUM MECHANICS for ENGINEERS

CONTINUUM MECHANICS for ENGINEERS

CONTINUUM MECHANICS for ENGINEERS

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

in Section 5.9 had response functions ψ, σ ij, η, and θ i postulated. However, it<br />

could have just as easily been postulated as a function of u, θ, σ ij, and q i.<br />

As an example of how Eqs 5.11-3 could restrict the independent variables,<br />

consider a fluid whose stress response function is assumed to be a function<br />

of density, ρ, velocity, v i, and velocity gradient, L ij. With these assumptions,<br />

the restrictions of Eq 5.11-3c would be<br />

+ + + + +<br />

σ ( ρ , v , D , W )= Q σ ( ρ,<br />

v , D , W ) Q<br />

ij k mn mn ip pl k mn mn lj<br />

(5.11-4)<br />

where the velocity gradient has been decomposed into its symmetric and<br />

skew-symmetric parts, D mn and W mn, respectively. Using the results of Problem<br />

5.31, Eqs 5.10-21c, 5.10-24, and 5.10-25, we find<br />

˜ σ ( ρ, v + c , Q D Q , Q W Q + Ω )= Q σ˜ ( ρ,<br />

v , D , W ) Q<br />

ij k k mp pq qn mp pq qn mn ip pl k mn mn lj<br />

(5.11-5)<br />

Since Eq 5.11-5 must hold <strong>for</strong> all motions, a specific rigid body rotation may<br />

be chosen to reduce the constitutive assumption of Eq 5.11-4. For this pur-<br />

˙Q ij = 0<br />

pose, suppose that Q ij = δ ij and thus . Using this motion and Eq 5.11-5<br />

implies<br />

( )= ( )<br />

˜ σ ρ, v + c , D , W σ˜ ρ,<br />

v , D , W<br />

ij k k mn mn ij k mn mn<br />

(5.11-6)<br />

where it is noted that Eq 5.10-15 has been used. In this case, vector ck is<br />

simply equal to the time derivative of the superposed rigid body motion<br />

integration factor (see Eq 5.10-8). This arbitrary nature would allow <strong>for</strong><br />

Eq 5.11-6 to be violated if the stress function has velocity as an independent<br />

variable. Thus, velocity must be removed from the independent variable list<br />

<strong>for</strong> stress, leaving<br />

˙a k<br />

σ σ˜ ρ,<br />

D , W<br />

= ( )<br />

ij ij mn mn<br />

(5.11-7)<br />

Again, with the modified response function Eq 5.11-7, the invariance condition<br />

under superposed rigid body motion may be written as<br />

˜ σ ( ρ, Q D Q , Q W Q + Ω )= Q σ˜ ( ρ,<br />

D , W ) Q<br />

ij mp pq qn mp pq qn mn ip pl mn mn lj<br />

(5.11-8)<br />

which must hold <strong>for</strong> all motions. Select a motion such that Qij = δij as be<strong>for</strong>e,<br />

but now require . Substitution of this into Eq 5.11-8 leaves<br />

Ωij ≠ 0<br />

( )= ( )<br />

˜ σ ρ, D , W + Ω<br />

σ˜ ρ,<br />

D , W<br />

ij mn mn mn ij mn mn<br />

(5.11-9)

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!