23.03.2013 Views

CONTINUUM MECHANICS for ENGINEERS

CONTINUUM MECHANICS for ENGINEERS

CONTINUUM MECHANICS for ENGINEERS

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

which, upon factoring the left-hand side and dividing by (dX) 2 , becomes<br />

dx − dX dx + dX dX dX<br />

i j<br />

= 2εij<br />

dX dX dX dX<br />

But dX i /dX = N i, a unit vector in the direction of dX, and <strong>for</strong> small de<strong>for</strong>mations<br />

we may assume (dx + dX)/dX ≈ 2, so that<br />

dx − dX<br />

= εijNN i j = Nˆ ⋅ε⋅Nˆ dX<br />

(4.7-9)<br />

The scalar ratio on the left-hand side of this equation is clearly the change<br />

in length per unit original length <strong>for</strong> the element in the direction of . It<br />

is known as the longitudinal strain, or the normal strain and we denote it by<br />

. If, <strong>for</strong> example, is taken in the X1 direction so that , then<br />

ˆN<br />

ˆ N<br />

Nˆ = Iˆ 1<br />

e ( ˆ N )<br />

ˆ ˆ<br />

ˆ ˆ<br />

e<br />

( Iˆ<br />

1)<br />

= Iˆ ⋅ε⋅ Iˆ<br />

= ε<br />

1 1 11<br />

Likewise, <strong>for</strong> N = I , or the normal strains are found to be ε22 and<br />

2 N = I3<br />

ε33, respectively. Thus, the diagonal elements of the small (infinitesimal)<br />

strain tensor represent normal strains in the coordinate directions.<br />

To gain an insight into the physical meaning of the off-diagonal elements<br />

of the infinitesimal strain tensor we consider differential vectors dX (1) and<br />

dX (2) at position P which are de<strong>for</strong>med into vectors dx (1) and dx (2) , respectively.<br />

In this case, Eq 4.6-19 may be written,<br />

dx (1) ⋅ dx (2) = dX (1) ⋅ dX (2) + dX (1) ⋅ 2ε ⋅ dX (2) (4.7-10)<br />

which, if we choose dX (1) and dX (2) perpendicular to one another, reduces to<br />

dx (1) ⋅ dx (2) = dx (1) dx (2) cosθ = dX (1) ⋅ 2ε ⋅ dX (2) (4.7-11)<br />

where θ is the angle between the de<strong>for</strong>med vectors as shown in Figure 4.3.<br />

If now we let , the angle measures the small change in the original<br />

right angle between dX (1) and dX (2) π<br />

θ = −γ<br />

γ<br />

2<br />

and also<br />

π<br />

cosθ = cos γ = sin ≈<br />

2 −<br />

⎛ ⎞<br />

γ γ<br />

⎝ ⎠<br />

since is very small <strong>for</strong> infinitesimal de<strong>for</strong>mations. There<strong>for</strong>e, assuming<br />

as be<strong>for</strong>e that dx (1) ≈ dX (1) and dx (2) ≈ dX (2) γ<br />

because of small de<strong>for</strong>mations<br />

γ ≈ θ = ⋅ ⋅ ≈ ⋅ ⋅<br />

cos ( 1)<br />

( 2)<br />

dX<br />

dX<br />

2ε Nˆ 2εNˆ<br />

( 1)<br />

dx dx<br />

( 2) ( 1) ( 2)<br />

(4.7-12)

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!