26.03.2013 Views

Henry Krabbendam - James - World Evangelical Alliance

Henry Krabbendam - James - World Evangelical Alliance

Henry Krabbendam - James - World Evangelical Alliance

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

equal all-consuming force in the life of any and all Christians. Truthfully, it is<br />

somewhat tragic that Scripture does (must?) refer the Christian to the ant<br />

(Prov. 6:6), the athlete, long distance runner or prizefighter (Paul; 1 Cor.<br />

9:24-26) and the farmer (Jam. 5:7) as models to be emulated. The Church<br />

should long for the day that the ant, the athlete and the farmer can be told that<br />

the only way to succeed in their vocation is to emulate the Christian as the<br />

exclusive alternative to (self-destructive) failure. I fear that the “Revival”<br />

days in which this was a possibility have been all too rare.<br />

At any rate, the main message is unmistakable. Patience has no time<br />

limit, no statue of limitations. It does not run out. To put it differently, “affliction”<br />

may never reach a “saturation point,” a “critical mass!” The Christian<br />

may never say, “I have taken all that I can. Enough is enough, and too<br />

much is too much. Now I will either give up or strike back!” I am not permitted<br />

either to quit or to retaliate, whether in deed or in word (Jam. 5:9), regardless<br />

whether the reference to the coming of the Lord is an encouragement<br />

or a warning. By way of bottom line, it would not be surprising, if <strong>James</strong> had<br />

both aspects in mind!<br />

Note well that <strong>James</strong> does not recommend “civil disobedience,” let alone<br />

armed revolution. Neither Acts 4:19ff, nor Acts 5:29, nor Daniel 3:16ff for<br />

that matter, authorize or justify either one of these reactions. Both Peter and<br />

Daniel’s friends couch the rationale for their conduct in terms of obedience to<br />

God. “We must obey God rather than man.” “Since God told us, ‘You shall<br />

have no other gods before me,’ we (simply) will not serve your gods, nor<br />

worship the golden image that you have set up.” In other words, both Peter<br />

and Daniel’s friends gave a clear message, “It never has been, nor will it ever<br />

be, our aim, whether explicitly or implicitly, to disobey authorities. But if<br />

they ask us to sin, let it be known that our obedience to God always has the<br />

absolute priority. He always pulls rank on any human being, however high his<br />

position or function. If this puts us on a collision course with authorities, and,<br />

as a result, they wish to call our conduct ‘disobedience,’ then that is their<br />

problem, not ours. Our conduct is ever and unfailingly a matter of obedience,<br />

however it is construed by others, either to the properly functioning governing<br />

authorities, or to the all overriding authority of God!”<br />

God requires two “dirty ‘s’-words” in the authority structures, sacrifice<br />

on the part of those in authority, the parent, the husband, the government, the<br />

elder and the employer, and submission on the part of the child, the wife, the<br />

citizen, the church member and the employee. The lack of submission neither<br />

justifies the lack of sacrifice, nor terminates the requirement of sacrifice. Vice<br />

versa, the lack of sacrifice never justifies the lack of submission, nor terminates<br />

the call for submission! This is the clear teaching of <strong>James</strong>. The balance<br />

778

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!