26.03.2013 Views

Henry Krabbendam - James - World Evangelical Alliance

Henry Krabbendam - James - World Evangelical Alliance

Henry Krabbendam - James - World Evangelical Alliance

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

II. PRINCIPLES OF HOLINESS IN THE BIBLICAL<br />

FRAMEWORK<br />

(2:1-26)<br />

Introduction<br />

In Chapter 2 <strong>James</strong> does not suddenly shift gears to deal with a number of unrelated<br />

topics in a disjointed way. Nothing could be further from the truth.<br />

First of all, under the umbrella of the overarching theme of “Practical<br />

Godliness” he focuses the attention of his readers upon two fundamental<br />

principles, upon the law of God as the full-orbed and all-encompassing substance<br />

of practical godliness, and upon faith as the powerful dynamic, the<br />

awesome driving force behind practical godliness. The former should not<br />

come as a surprise in the light of <strong>James</strong> 2:25, neither the latter in the light of<br />

<strong>James</strong> 1:6. He extrapolates on two earlier mentioned themes as two buds and<br />

presents them in their full bloom. Let me make some introductory remarks<br />

about both in order to show, where <strong>James</strong> is coming from, and where he is<br />

heading. First then <strong>James</strong>’ purpose in his focus upon the law! He apparently<br />

has not exhausted this subject in the previous section.<br />

The law clearly cannot make a person holy. God “tried” to do just that<br />

with the law on Mount Sinai, and he “failed.” Of course, he “tried” and<br />

“failed” methodologically in order to demonstrate once and for all that “to<br />

try” is by definition “to fail.” Paul’s pointed statement to the effect that the<br />

law was designed to “stir” up sin (Rom. 7:8-11; Gal. 3:19) leaves no doubt<br />

about this. Especially this methodological, and therefore pedagogical, “failure”<br />

accentuates the indispensable nature of the full, triadic, Gospel. Just as<br />

“Mt. Sinai” demonstrates that there is no such thing as a “good will” in regeneration<br />

(John 1:12-13), nor of “good works” in justification (Rom 4:1-8),<br />

so it also demonstrates that there is no such thing as “good efforts” in sanctification.<br />

The law does not only prove to be the taskmaster/tutor unto Christ as<br />

the sole origin of regeneration (Deut. 31:26-27; Rom. 6:6). Neither does the<br />

law merely prove to be the taskmaster/tutor unto Christ as the sole ground of<br />

justification (Gal. 4:24). It also proves to be the taskmaster/tutor unto Christ<br />

as the sole source of sanctification (Rom. 7:4-6).<br />

By the same token the law certainly can and does tell us what holiness is,<br />

contrary to the anti-nomian and non-nomian positions, outlined in the context<br />

of <strong>James</strong> 1:25. Nevertheless, however much the law exposes sin in, and spells<br />

death for, rebels (Deut. 30:14-20), in and by itself it spells holiness and life<br />

465

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!