26.03.2013 Views

Henry Krabbendam - James - World Evangelical Alliance

Henry Krabbendam - James - World Evangelical Alliance

Henry Krabbendam - James - World Evangelical Alliance

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

heaven (Eph. 2:6; Col. 3:3; Heb. 10:10), but already purposefully here on<br />

earth. 245<br />

Although the case <strong>James</strong> presents is hypothetical (Jam. 2:15), there is no<br />

reason to conclude that this scenario cannot occur, has not occurred, does not<br />

occur and will not occur (Martin, 85)! The extremity of the case underscores<br />

the intensity and seriousness of <strong>James</strong>’ insistence upon an “active faith.” To<br />

claim to have faith, without possessing practical godliness, is tantamount to<br />

saying a pious “good-bye” to folks who are ill-clad, and are famishing for<br />

lack of food, and in essence letting them freeze to death and die of hunger<br />

(See 1 John 3:18). Therefore, such claim, which is “limited to verbal expressions”<br />

only (Cargal, 121), is hollow, and exposes the claimants as pretentious<br />

and presumptuous impostors, who are “twice dead” (Jude 12), “dead in their<br />

natural condition and dead after their (lifeless) profession” (Manton, 233).<br />

There is a remarkable parallel with <strong>James</strong> 1:22. Just as hearing the Word<br />

means nothing without doing the Word, speaking the Word means equally<br />

nothing, if it is not accompanied by action! <strong>James</strong> 2:17 is a worthy and telling<br />

conclusion. Clearly faith alone justifies us before God’s tribunal. But any<br />

pretended faith that remains alone and does not qualify as a living and fruit<br />

bearing faith, is not worthy of the name, is not “justifiable” before God or<br />

man, and cannot claim a living hope (1 Pet. 1:3). It is mock-faith, in the same<br />

ballpark as mock-love, and as such “hateful” (Manton, 237; <strong>Henry</strong>, III, 1294-<br />

1295). This is clearly indicated by the question with which <strong>James</strong> both rhetorically<br />

starts and emphatically ends this paragraph. “What good is it (to be a<br />

hypothetical-faith-without-works reader, who offers only a prayer and good<br />

wishes, without giving folks in need what ‘they need for the body’)? ... No<br />

good at all” (Brosend, 73)!<br />

All this should be compared with God’s care for the physical needs of<br />

his people.<br />

1. God promises after the flood that the earth will always produce food<br />

(Gen. 8:22) to support life. This has a strong bearing upon the discussions<br />

pertaining to the world’s food shortages, and its over-population. Many moderns<br />

in their secularistic humanism approach the problem in the same way as<br />

the people in the time of the tower of Babel (Gen. 11:1-9). They become<br />

restless, “statist” and “socialist,” planners, hoping to survive in the face of the<br />

threatening presence and the dangerous future, rather than resting on the<br />

promise of God that the earth will always produce a sufficient food supply.<br />

Ironically the more rigorous statist and socialistic ideology is applied, the<br />

more harm is done to the food supply. History records that “bread baskets,”<br />

245<br />

This is why both “a tract should be wrapped up in a sandwich” (Spurgeon) and “a sandwich<br />

wrapped up in a tract” (Motyer, 111).<br />

518

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!