26.03.2013 Views

Henry Krabbendam - James - World Evangelical Alliance

Henry Krabbendam - James - World Evangelical Alliance

Henry Krabbendam - James - World Evangelical Alliance

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>James</strong> editorializes about Genesis 22 in a fivefold manner. He starts out<br />

by clearly stating his initial proposition (Jam. 2:21) and concludes with triumphantly<br />

(“You see”) restating it as a universal proposition (Jam. 2:24). The<br />

threefold substance of his argument is sandwiched in between.<br />

542<br />

1. Abraham was justified by deeds: He “sacrificed” Isaac (2:21).<br />

2. Faith was active along with his deeds: It originates them (2:22a).<br />

3. Faith was completed by deeds: It requires them (2:22b).<br />

4. Genesis 15:5 was fulfilled in deeds: It came into its own in them (2:23).<br />

5. A man is justified by deeds and not by faith alone (2:24).<br />

All five points are in need of elaboration. But before this is done, the pivotal<br />

significance of Genesis 15:5 should be recognized. While its interpretation is<br />

to be settled below, it ought to be emphasized already that both <strong>James</strong> and<br />

Paul anchor their specific “doctrine of justification” in this pivotal verse.<br />

<strong>James</strong> argues that his doctrine of justification by deeds is the natural extension<br />

of Genesis 15, while Paul extrapolates his doctrine of justification by<br />

faith from it. As such it proves to be a tree that carries two equally significant<br />

branches, two equally necessary truths, each one in its own right. Now on to<br />

the “five points” of <strong>James</strong>!<br />

1. The first order of business is to settle the meaning of the phrase,<br />

“Abraham was justified by his deeds.” How does <strong>James</strong> use the verb “to justify?”<br />

According to the various commentators it can carry (a) a demonstrative<br />

(Ezek. 16:51; Mt. 11:19), (b) a declarative (Is. 53:11; Lk. 18:14), or (c) an<br />

“evaluative” force. The translation, then, would be “Abraham was (a)<br />

‘shown,’ (b) ‘declared,’ or (c) ‘considered’ to be righteous by his deeds.” I<br />

first lay out these views with the arguments that have been adduced in support.<br />

After that I evaluate and assess them, and conclude by sharing my preference<br />

and the reasons for it.<br />

(a) If the verb in this context carries a demonstrative (or “expressive”)<br />

force, <strong>James</strong> tells us that by virtue of his deeds, the long trek to Mt. Moriah,<br />

and the near sacrifice of his son, there was no shadow of a doubt left about<br />

Abraham’s standing before God as a thoroughly righteous person. It was out<br />

in the open, for everyone to see. Here are some samples from commentators<br />

who hold this view. “Our father Abraham was shown to be righteous on the<br />

basis of his faith,” in line with Matthew 11:19, 12:37, and 1 Corinthians 4:4<br />

(Johnson, 242). Likewise, “Wasn’t Abraham proved righteous (as demonstrated)<br />

by his deeds?” (Martin, 91, with reference to Gen. 44:16 and Lk.<br />

7:29-35). There is no doubt that this interpretation is linguistically possible<br />

and respectable (Moo, 1985, 109, with reference to Gen. 44:6; Lk. 7:29, 35;

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!