27.03.2013 Views

Coming to Terms with Reality. Evaluation of the Belgian Debt Relief ...

Coming to Terms with Reality. Evaluation of the Belgian Debt Relief ...

Coming to Terms with Reality. Evaluation of the Belgian Debt Relief ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

| 196 |<br />

Annexes<br />

Table 6 highlights <strong>the</strong> improvement in <strong>the</strong> current account balance, from a deficit <strong>of</strong> over<br />

300 billion FCFA in 2004, <strong>to</strong> a surplus <strong>of</strong> 62 billion FCFA in 2006. The capital account<br />

remained positive after 2004, especially because <strong>of</strong> a decrease in <strong>the</strong> public debt transfers,<br />

and a slight increase in <strong>the</strong> private sec<strong>to</strong>r net inflows. Net foreign assets have been rising<br />

steadily since 1999. Starting from 1992 cumulated changes <strong>of</strong> net foreign assets amounted<br />

<strong>to</strong> nearly 500 billion FCFA by 2002 and <strong>to</strong> nearly 2,000 billion FCFA by 2008. The role <strong>of</strong><br />

debt alleviation in this process, however, has been quite limited.<br />

5.5 Public Finance<br />

We now turn <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> effect <strong>of</strong> debt alleviation on public finance. Between 1996 and 2007 <strong>the</strong> share<br />

<strong>of</strong> interest payments in Government revenues has declined substantially. This can be explained<br />

first by <strong>the</strong> diminishing debt burden, and second by <strong>the</strong> increase in government revenues:<br />

Figure 18 Government Revenues, Expenditures and Fiscal Surplus, 1998-2008<br />

Billions <strong>of</strong> CFA France<br />

2500<br />

2000<br />

1500<br />

1000<br />

500<br />

0<br />

-500<br />

Source: IMF<br />

1998<br />

1990'<br />

'2000<br />

2001<br />

Total Revenues<br />

(excluding privatization proceeds)<br />

2002<br />

Total Expenditures<br />

'2007(e) '2008(p)<br />

In figure 18 we present <strong>the</strong> evolution <strong>of</strong> Government revenues and expenditures between<br />

1998 and 2008, and <strong>the</strong> fiscal surplus The country has had a budgetary surplus from <strong>the</strong><br />

year 2000 onward (<strong>with</strong> <strong>the</strong> exception <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> year 2005). This is mainly explained by <strong>the</strong><br />

'2003<br />

2004<br />

2005<br />

2006<br />

Budgetary Surplus (if positive)<br />

<strong>Coming</strong> <strong>to</strong> <strong>Terms</strong> <strong>with</strong> <strong>Reality</strong><br />

increasing oil revenues 105 . These revenues represented about 22% <strong>of</strong> <strong>to</strong>tal Government<br />

revenues in 2000 and went up <strong>to</strong> over 35% in 2007.<br />

For <strong>the</strong> sake <strong>of</strong> comparison, and <strong>to</strong> put <strong>the</strong> Government’s interest burden in perspective, we<br />

present in figure 19 <strong>the</strong> interest due on <strong>to</strong>tal public debt and <strong>the</strong> Government oil revenues<br />

between 1996 and 2008:<br />

Figure 19 Interest due on External Public <strong>Debt</strong> and Government Oil Revenues, 1996-2008:<br />

Percent (%)<br />

1000<br />

900<br />

800<br />

700<br />

600<br />

500<br />

400<br />

300<br />

200<br />

100<br />

0<br />

Source: IMF<br />

1996<br />

1997<br />

1998<br />

1999<br />

2000<br />

Oil Revenues<br />

Interest Expenditures due<br />

2001<br />

The oil revenues received by <strong>the</strong> Government doubled between 2004 and 2007, due <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

increasing oil price combined <strong>with</strong> a slightly declining output. In <strong>the</strong> year 2007 <strong>the</strong>se<br />

revenues represented about 630 billion FCFA, nearly twice as much as what <strong>the</strong> country<br />

received in interim debt relief under <strong>the</strong> HIPC Initiative between Oc<strong>to</strong>ber 2000 and<br />

Oc<strong>to</strong>ber 2006. Ano<strong>the</strong>r way <strong>to</strong> put <strong>the</strong> oil revenues and interest payments in perspective is<br />

<strong>to</strong> analyze <strong>the</strong> difference between <strong>to</strong>tal and primary government expenditures and <strong>the</strong><br />

difference between <strong>to</strong>tal government revenues <strong>with</strong> and <strong>with</strong>out oil revenues. These<br />

variables are represented in figure 20.<br />

105 For <strong>the</strong> year 2004, <strong>the</strong> fiscal deficit can be explained by a decrease in <strong>to</strong>tal grants and in <strong>the</strong> non-oil tax<br />

revenues. The oil revenues stayed nearly at <strong>the</strong>ir 2003 level.<br />

2002<br />

2003<br />

2004<br />

2005<br />

2006<br />

2007 (e)<br />

2008 (p)<br />

| 197 |

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!