27.03.2013 Views

Coming to Terms with Reality. Evaluation of the Belgian Debt Relief ...

Coming to Terms with Reality. Evaluation of the Belgian Debt Relief ...

Coming to Terms with Reality. Evaluation of the Belgian Debt Relief ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

| 198 |<br />

Annexes<br />

Figure 20 Total and Primary Government Expenditures (left) and Total Government<br />

Revenues <strong>with</strong> and <strong>with</strong>out Oil (right), 1994-2008, billions <strong>of</strong> FCFA<br />

Billions <strong>of</strong> FCFA<br />

Billions <strong>of</strong> FCFA<br />

2500<br />

2000<br />

1500<br />

1000<br />

500<br />

0<br />

2500<br />

2000<br />

1500<br />

1000<br />

500<br />

0<br />

1994<br />

1994<br />

1995<br />

1996<br />

1997<br />

Source: IMF, Statistical Appendixes<br />

1998<br />

1999<br />

2000<br />

Total Expenditure Total Primary Expenditures<br />

1995<br />

1996<br />

1997<br />

1998<br />

1999<br />

2000<br />

As figure 20 shows <strong>the</strong> HIPC Initiative, by decreasing <strong>the</strong> interest payments due by <strong>the</strong><br />

Cameroonian Government, has translated in<strong>to</strong> a decreasing difference between <strong>to</strong>tal and<br />

primary Government expenditure. The right hand side <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> figure shows that in recent<br />

years <strong>the</strong> gap between Government revenues <strong>with</strong> and <strong>with</strong>out oil has widened. Figure 21<br />

represents <strong>the</strong> primary surplus (deficit) <strong>with</strong> and <strong>with</strong>out oil revenues, and it shows us <strong>the</strong><br />

importance <strong>of</strong> those revenues for <strong>the</strong> state:<br />

2001<br />

2001<br />

2002<br />

2002<br />

2003<br />

Total Revenues (excluding privatization proceeds)<br />

Total Revenues (excl privat. Procds. AND oil revenues)<br />

2003<br />

2004<br />

2004<br />

2005<br />

2005<br />

2006<br />

2006<br />

2007(1)<br />

2007(1)<br />

2008(p)<br />

2008(p)<br />

2009(p)<br />

<strong>Coming</strong> <strong>to</strong> <strong>Terms</strong> <strong>with</strong> <strong>Reality</strong><br />

Figure 21 Primary Fiscal Deficit (+ = Surplus) <strong>with</strong> and <strong>with</strong>out oil revenues, 1994-<br />

2008, billions <strong>of</strong> FCFA:<br />

Billions <strong>of</strong> FCFA<br />

600<br />

400<br />

200<br />

0<br />

-200<br />

-400<br />

-600<br />

Source: IMF, Statistical Appendixes<br />

We conclude that <strong>the</strong> debt relief has contributed <strong>to</strong> a positive fiscal outcome. But as <strong>with</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> current account, <strong>the</strong> effect <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> increasing oil price was by far more important than<br />

<strong>the</strong> HIPC debt relief.<br />

We now consider more specifically <strong>the</strong> government expenditure in <strong>the</strong> three main sec<strong>to</strong>rs<br />

highlighted by <strong>the</strong> PRSP, which are education, health and infrastructure. We present three<br />

pieces <strong>of</strong> evidence. First figure 22a shows public expenditures on education, health and<br />

infrastructure, as a percentage <strong>of</strong> <strong>to</strong>tal expenditures, for <strong>the</strong> years 1995, 2000 and 2004. We<br />

observe a steady growth in <strong>the</strong> share <strong>of</strong> health and education over <strong>the</strong> years and an increase<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> share <strong>of</strong> infrastructure in <strong>the</strong> year 2004. We also notice <strong>the</strong> importance <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

expenditures on education which represented more than 25% <strong>of</strong> <strong>to</strong>tal expenditures in 2004.<br />

Figure 22a Government Expenditures on Education, Health and Infrastructure, in<br />

percent <strong>of</strong> Total Public Expenditures, 1995, 2000 and 2004:<br />

Percentb <strong>of</strong> Total<br />

30<br />

25<br />

20<br />

15<br />

10<br />

5<br />

0<br />

1994<br />

1995<br />

1996<br />

1997<br />

Source: IMF, Country Reports<br />

1998<br />

1999<br />

2000<br />

2001<br />

Primary Fiscal Balance (Oil Included)<br />

Education<br />

Part <strong>of</strong> Total (1995)<br />

2002<br />

Health<br />

2003<br />

Part <strong>of</strong> Total (2000)<br />

2004<br />

2005<br />

2006<br />

2007(e)<br />

Primary Fiscal Balance (Oil excluded)<br />

Infrastructure<br />

Part <strong>of</strong> Total (2004)<br />

2008(p)<br />

2009(p)<br />

| 199 |

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!