27.03.2013 Views

Coming to Terms with Reality. Evaluation of the Belgian Debt Relief ...

Coming to Terms with Reality. Evaluation of the Belgian Debt Relief ...

Coming to Terms with Reality. Evaluation of the Belgian Debt Relief ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

| 118 |<br />

Case study Cameroon<br />

The second feature <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> ONDD stance is a progressive leng<strong>the</strong>ning <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> repayment<br />

period. This went from a five year grace period combined <strong>with</strong> a four years repayment<br />

period in <strong>the</strong> first agreement (1989) <strong>to</strong> a grace period <strong>of</strong> ten years combined <strong>with</strong> a ten<br />

years repayment period for certain debts under <strong>the</strong> fifth agreement. Moreover in order <strong>to</strong><br />

reach <strong>the</strong> agreed debt reduction in (N)PV terms, repayments were made progressive over<br />

time.<br />

Table 4.4 also shows that in order <strong>to</strong> reach a debt reduction <strong>of</strong> 67% in net present value terms<br />

in <strong>the</strong> sixth agreement (2001) <strong>the</strong> repayment periods became even longer and for some <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

debts 90% <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> principle was <strong>to</strong> be repaid in one bullet payment in <strong>the</strong> year 2124.<br />

After Cameroon was given Completion Point status in April 2006, <strong>the</strong> Paris Club decided<br />

on complete cancellation <strong>of</strong> debt resulting from <strong>the</strong> second and third rescheduling and on<br />

substantial reduction <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r debt resulting from loans originally contracted before <strong>the</strong><br />

cut-<strong>of</strong>f date. In application <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Paris Club agreement, <strong>the</strong> ONDD agreed <strong>to</strong> cancel <strong>the</strong><br />

outstanding debt resulting from rescheduling agreement two <strong>to</strong> six (<strong>the</strong> debt claims<br />

resulting from <strong>the</strong> first agreement had been paid or rescheduled). Article three <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

bilateral agreement states explicitly:<br />

« L’ONDD confirme que la République [du Cameroun] n’a plus aucune obligation de<br />

paiement à son égard en vertu des conventions bilatérales [deux à six] »<br />

As can be seen in table 4.5, <strong>the</strong> <strong>to</strong>tal amount <strong>of</strong> debt involved was 216.9 million EUR,<br />

including interim interest from <strong>the</strong> date <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> bilateral agreement. If we exclude <strong>the</strong> latter,<br />

<strong>the</strong> <strong>to</strong>tal amount <strong>of</strong> debt and interest cancellation was 215.9 million EUR. Out <strong>of</strong> this 67.6<br />

million EUR were claims originating on ONDD’s own account and 124.1 million EUR<br />

were claims on <strong>the</strong> State account. The remainder consisted <strong>of</strong> remaining claims <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

original insurance takers or <strong>of</strong> reinsurers.<br />

Table 4.4 Remaining claims cancelled at HIPC Completion Point (in mio EUR)<br />

Principal Capitalised interest Interim interest Total<br />

Total 92.3 123.7 1.0 216.9<br />

o/w for account <strong>of</strong> ONDD 26.9 40.5 0.3 67.6<br />

o/w for <strong>the</strong> State account 59.5 64.0 0.6 124.1<br />

Source: ONDD<br />

Table 4.5 also shows that more than half <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> debts cancelled consisted <strong>of</strong> accumulated<br />

interest. The difference between accumulated interests and principal was especially high<br />

for <strong>the</strong> claims on <strong>the</strong> ONDD’s own account.<br />

In order <strong>to</strong> calculate <strong>the</strong> compensation claim, two adjustments have <strong>to</strong> be made. First, in<br />

<strong>the</strong> discussions preceding <strong>the</strong> decisions <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Council <strong>of</strong> Ministers it had been agreed that<br />

<strong>the</strong> compensation <strong>to</strong> be paid <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> ONDD would be on <strong>the</strong> basis <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> ‘economic value’<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> debts, calculated on <strong>the</strong> basis <strong>of</strong> an ONDD model applied <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> situation ‘in<br />

<strong>Coming</strong> <strong>to</strong> <strong>Terms</strong> <strong>with</strong> <strong>Reality</strong><br />

tempore non suspec<strong>to</strong>’ (i.e. at <strong>the</strong> end <strong>of</strong> 1999). For Cameroon <strong>the</strong> application <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

formula resulted in an economic value <strong>of</strong> 46% <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> nominal value. Second, rescheduled<br />

debts for which Development Cooperation had already paid compensation would not be<br />

eligible for a new compensation. Table 4.6 shows <strong>the</strong> list <strong>of</strong> previous operations, in<br />

execution <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> 1991 agreement. As shown, six operations have been realised in this<br />

context. The first operation (March 1996) was <strong>the</strong> purchase <strong>of</strong> a claim, under <strong>the</strong> swap<br />

window, <strong>of</strong> approximately 439.4 million BEF (10.9 million EUR) at 33% <strong>of</strong> its nominal<br />

value. As such, DGD paid around 145 million BEF or 3.6 million EUR. The remaining five<br />

operations were (partial) compensations <strong>of</strong> Paris Club debt relief by <strong>the</strong> ONDD.<br />

Table 4.5 Past compensations (in mio EUR)<br />

Date Nature <strong>of</strong> operation Amount <strong>of</strong> claim/debt<br />

cancellation<br />

Purchase price<br />

Mar 6, 1996 Purchase <strong>of</strong> claim on government<br />

account (swap)<br />

10.9 3.6<br />

Dec 13, 2000 Participation in Paris Club debt relief 8.1 4.1<br />

Aug 2, 2001 Participation in Paris Club debt relief 6.1 3.1<br />

Jan 24, 2001 Participation in Paris Club debt relief 5.5 2.7<br />

Nov 14, 2002 Participation in Paris Club debt relief 9.9 5.0<br />

Nov 14, 2002 Participation in Paris Club debt relief 8.5 4.2<br />

Total 49.1 22.7<br />

<strong>of</strong> which: Participation in<br />

Paris Club debt relief<br />

38.2 19.1<br />

Source: ONDD<br />

Taking in<strong>to</strong> account <strong>the</strong>se operations, table 4.7 presents <strong>the</strong> final claim. It takes in<strong>to</strong><br />

account previous compensations by subtracting it from <strong>the</strong> nominal value <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> claim;<br />

finally <strong>the</strong> remaining amount is multiplied by <strong>the</strong> so-called economic value <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> claim,<br />

which comes from <strong>the</strong> internal scoring model <strong>of</strong> ONDD, <strong>to</strong> arrive at <strong>the</strong> combined claim <strong>of</strong><br />

70.6 million EUR. 85<br />

Table 4.6 Calculation <strong>of</strong> final ONDD claim for Cameroon (in mio EUR)<br />

Nominal<br />

value<br />

<strong>Debt</strong> compensated in<br />

previous operations<br />

Basis for calculation<br />

<strong>of</strong> claim<br />

Own account 67.6 - 67.6 31.1<br />

State Account<br />

Source: ONDD<br />

124.1 38.2 85.9 39.5<br />

Claim (46% <strong>of</strong><br />

previous column)<br />

It was also attempted <strong>to</strong> calculate <strong>the</strong> effect <strong>of</strong> separating <strong>the</strong> two (2001 and 2005)<br />

agreements, in<strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> debt relief which would result from a strict application <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> HIPC<br />

Cologne terms <strong>of</strong> debt relief (i.e. a 90% cancellation in NPV), as agreed upon in <strong>the</strong> 2001<br />

agreement, and <strong>the</strong> remaining debt relief resulting from <strong>the</strong> decision <strong>to</strong> move instead <strong>to</strong><br />

85 This claim remains unsettled as <strong>of</strong> <strong>to</strong>day.<br />

| 119 |

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!