27.03.2013 Views

Coming to Terms with Reality. Evaluation of the Belgian Debt Relief ...

Coming to Terms with Reality. Evaluation of the Belgian Debt Relief ...

Coming to Terms with Reality. Evaluation of the Belgian Debt Relief ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

| 208 |<br />

Annexes<br />

<strong>the</strong> funds generated by HIPC debt forgiveness and set apart for projects administered by <strong>the</strong><br />

Comité Consultatif et de Suivi, but also for <strong>the</strong> general investment budget. Only <strong>the</strong> C2D<br />

program, set up <strong>with</strong> <strong>the</strong> French Development Cooperation, seems on its way <strong>to</strong> perform<br />

better. On <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r hand private investment as a percentage <strong>of</strong> GDP had strongly increased<br />

between 2000 and 2001, but <strong>the</strong>reafter it gradually decreased, from 18.1% in 2001 <strong>to</strong> 14.5%<br />

in 2007. So if reaching <strong>the</strong> Decision Point had initially favorably affected <strong>the</strong> expectations <strong>of</strong><br />

inves<strong>to</strong>rs, ei<strong>the</strong>r because <strong>the</strong>y expected a positive effect on public finance or because <strong>the</strong>y<br />

hoped for policy improvements, that effect was not sustained. As mentioned in subsection 5.7<br />

<strong>the</strong>re are a number <strong>of</strong> explanations for <strong>the</strong> ra<strong>the</strong>r weak private investments, including<br />

deficient transport infrastructure, problems <strong>with</strong> electricity supply, and weak governance.<br />

Summarizing, <strong>the</strong> available data do not allow us <strong>to</strong> pinpoint what exactly were <strong>the</strong> main<br />

causes <strong>of</strong> Cameroon’s weak growth performance after <strong>the</strong> country reached <strong>the</strong> HIPC<br />

Decision Point. We cannot exclude that <strong>the</strong> debt forgives starting in <strong>the</strong> year 2000 and <strong>the</strong><br />

expectation <strong>of</strong> more substantial debt forgiveness after reaching <strong>the</strong> Completion Point have<br />

had a positive effect on economic growth, since we are not sure what would have<br />

happened if <strong>the</strong> debt forgiveness under <strong>the</strong> HIPC Initiative had not taken place. But if <strong>the</strong>re<br />

was an effect, it has been swamped by o<strong>the</strong>r, negatively impacting decisions and events.<br />

We cannot be exclude that new data will show that <strong>the</strong> debt cancellation upon reaching <strong>the</strong><br />

Completion Point has had a positive impact on growth performance. The effects <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> debt<br />

cancellation may take time <strong>to</strong> realize. We can only observe that <strong>the</strong> growth rate <strong>of</strong> GDP in<br />

2007 was in line <strong>with</strong> <strong>the</strong> relatively low figures <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> immediately preceding years.<br />

6.2 Impact on poverty<br />

We first discuss <strong>the</strong> possible impact <strong>of</strong> debt forgiveness on poverty by considering <strong>the</strong><br />

headcount ratio. We <strong>the</strong>n analyze changes in a four social indica<strong>to</strong>rs linked <strong>to</strong> poverty;<br />

<strong>the</strong>se indica<strong>to</strong>rs belong <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> fields <strong>of</strong> health and education.<br />

6.2.1 Poverty headcount<br />

The sources <strong>of</strong> information on poverty are <strong>the</strong> household surveys <strong>of</strong> 1996, 2001 and 2007,<br />

implemented by <strong>the</strong> National Institute <strong>of</strong> Statistics (NIS). The survey <strong>of</strong> 1996 covered<br />

1700 households, whereas those <strong>of</strong> 2001 and 2007 covered more than 10,000 households.<br />

The first survey is <strong>the</strong>refore likely <strong>to</strong> imply larger margins <strong>of</strong> error than <strong>the</strong> later ones. A<br />

national poverty line was computed by <strong>the</strong> NIS by considering food and non-food<br />

expenditure; it was updated for inflation. In 2007 <strong>the</strong> poverty line was 738 FCFA (1.13 €)<br />

per person per day.<br />

The data in table 9 suggest that between 2001 and 2007 <strong>the</strong> percentage <strong>of</strong> people below <strong>the</strong><br />

poverty line has not substantially changed. This is in sharp contrast <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> period 1996-<br />

2001, when <strong>the</strong> overall poverty rate strongly decreased. This must have been <strong>the</strong> case even<br />

if we take in<strong>to</strong> account <strong>the</strong> larger margin <strong>of</strong> error in <strong>the</strong> 1996 survey. The decline <strong>of</strong><br />

poverty between 1996 and 2001 was observed both in urban and in rural areas, but it was<br />

<strong>Coming</strong> <strong>to</strong> <strong>Terms</strong> <strong>with</strong> <strong>Reality</strong><br />

strongest in urban areas where <strong>the</strong> percentage <strong>of</strong> poor people in <strong>the</strong> population decreased<br />

by more than half. After 2001 poverty continued <strong>to</strong> decline in urban areas, <strong>with</strong> a strong<br />

decline in <strong>the</strong> two main cities, Douala and Yaoundé. But in rural areas <strong>the</strong> percentage <strong>of</strong><br />

poor people living in poor households did increase.<br />

Table 9 Evolution <strong>of</strong> population under <strong>the</strong> poverty line (percentage <strong>of</strong> people living in<br />

households <strong>with</strong> average income below <strong>the</strong> poverty line in <strong>to</strong>tal population):<br />

1996 2001 2007<br />

Global 53.3 40.2 39.9<br />

Rural 59.6 52.1 55.0<br />

Urban 41.4 17.9 12.2<br />

Source: NIS (2008)<br />

These observations are in line <strong>with</strong> our remarks on economic growth in <strong>the</strong> previous<br />

subsection. Whereas over <strong>the</strong> period 1994-2000 <strong>the</strong> growth <strong>of</strong> value added in agriculture<br />

was ra<strong>the</strong>r high, it was much lower after 2000. On <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r hand after 2001 we observe a<br />

strong growth <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> service sec<strong>to</strong>r. Agricultural growth is <strong>of</strong> course linked <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> evolution<br />

<strong>of</strong> income in rural areas, whereas <strong>the</strong> service sec<strong>to</strong>r can be expected <strong>to</strong> have a stronger<br />

impact on urban areas. More detailed figures suggest that especially households in <strong>the</strong> two<br />

main cities, Douala and Yaoundé, did pr<strong>of</strong>it from <strong>the</strong> growth <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> service sec<strong>to</strong>r.<br />

Summarizing, <strong>the</strong> data do not provide indications that <strong>the</strong> debt alleviation resulting from <strong>the</strong><br />

HIPC and MDRI has reduced poverty. Apart from a lower overall growth rate, <strong>the</strong> nature <strong>of</strong><br />

economic growth after 2001 seems <strong>to</strong> have caused an increase in poverty incidence in rural<br />

areas. We should again remark that we cannot exclude that in <strong>the</strong> absence <strong>of</strong> debt alleviation<br />

poverty may have remained even more widespread than we observe in <strong>the</strong> data.<br />

6.2.2 Social indica<strong>to</strong>rs<br />

To study <strong>the</strong> evolution <strong>of</strong> welfare and <strong>of</strong> poverty, it is also interesting <strong>to</strong> consider <strong>the</strong> changes<br />

in a number <strong>of</strong> social indica<strong>to</strong>rs. There is a long list <strong>of</strong> such indica<strong>to</strong>rs. In this subsection we<br />

limit our analysis <strong>to</strong> four indica<strong>to</strong>rs, two in <strong>the</strong> field <strong>of</strong> health and two in <strong>the</strong> education sec<strong>to</strong>r.<br />

We start <strong>with</strong> infant and child mortality. Data on this indica<strong>to</strong>r are provided by <strong>the</strong><br />

Demographic and Health Surveys implemented by <strong>the</strong> National Institute <strong>of</strong> Statistics in <strong>the</strong><br />

years 1991, 1998 and 2004. The last survey may have been <strong>to</strong>o early <strong>to</strong> register fully<br />

possible improvements linked <strong>to</strong> HIPC debt alleviation.<br />

Table 10 Infant and Child Mortality (deaths per thousand):<br />

1990-1994 1995-1999 2000-2004<br />

Infant mortality (birth <strong>to</strong> age one) 80 89 74<br />

Child mortality (birth <strong>to</strong> age five) 133 152 144<br />

Source : NIS (2004), table 11.1<br />

| 209 |

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!