29.03.2013 Views

October 2006 Volume 9 Number 4

October 2006 Volume 9 Number 4

October 2006 Volume 9 Number 4

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Bender, D. M., & Vredevoogd, J. D. (<strong>2006</strong>). Using Online Education Technologies to Support Studio Instruction.<br />

Educational Technology & Society, 9 (4), 114-122.<br />

Using Online Education Technologies to Support Studio Instruction<br />

Diane M. Bender<br />

College of Design, Arizona State University, P.O. Box 872105, Tempe, AZ 85287-2105, USA<br />

Tel: +1 480-965-8684<br />

diane.bender@asu.edu<br />

Jon D. Vredevoogd<br />

School of Planning, Design, and Construction, Michigan State University, 309 Human Ecology, East Lansing,<br />

MI 48824 USA<br />

Tel: +1 517-353-3054<br />

vredevoo@msu.edu<br />

ABSTRACT<br />

Technology is transforming the education and practice of architecture and design. The newest form of<br />

education is blended learning, which combines personal interaction from live class sessions with online<br />

education for greater learning flexibility (Abrams & Haefner, 2002). Reluctant to join the digital era are<br />

educators teaching studio courses (Bender & Good, 2003), who may be unaware of the possibilities and<br />

benefits of teaching with technology. The argument proposed in this study is that blended learning will<br />

enhance studio courses. Studios are unique learning environments embedded in an historical context. This<br />

article presents a process of infusing a traditional studio with online technologies. The result is a more<br />

streamlined course that enhances student learning, provides targeted instruction to individual students,<br />

serves a larger group of students than a traditional studio, and does not increase faculty workload.<br />

Keywords<br />

Online education, Studio, Faculty workload<br />

Introduction<br />

Technology is moving higher education from the traditional campus of “brick and mortar” to the electronic<br />

classroom of “wire and chip.” The technology with the greatest potential for impact on architectural education is<br />

the Internet. By the year <strong>2006</strong>, it is estimated there will be 900 million computers and other web-based<br />

appliances in use, providing universal access, multimedia resources, and interactive medium (Charp, 2000). The<br />

Internet has revolutionized the design process by allowing architects and designers to research new products,<br />

download specifications, access code information, transfer drawings, and even synchronously collaborate with<br />

colleagues from around the world. Technology is also having an impact on the process and culture of<br />

architectural education, as evident in previous research on digitally immersed classes and studios (Matthews &<br />

Weigand, 2001). The use of digital media is a logical addition to the traditional design studio.<br />

Technology has radically changed the way educators can exchange information with students. Higher education<br />

support systems have adapted to changes in technological innovation, but the studio has remained disturbingly<br />

constant. Pedagogical integration of digital media is critical to the success of future architecture and design<br />

education. With the ever-increasing need to communicate globally, distance is no longer a barrier to education<br />

(Matthews & Weigand, 2001). Based on several years of experimentation, the authors believe studio courses can<br />

be enhanced with online technologies. A popular format for teaching both in the classroom and online is blended<br />

learning. Blended learning involves both traditional face-to-face instruction, where both students and faculty are<br />

present at the same time and place, supplemented with asynchronous and/or synchronous communication via the<br />

Internet. In comparison to courses that are completely online, courses with a combination of online and face-toface<br />

interaction produce the same or better success rates, plus dropout rates are lower (Dziuban & Moskal,<br />

2004). The authors are not advocating technology as a substitute for the existing process, but as a means to<br />

enrich instruction in the design studio.<br />

There are many benefits of using online technologies, such as the accuracy and consistency of data. All students<br />

are guaranteed to receive the same presentation material and get the same view of the professor and material,<br />

unlike the front row advantage in the traditional classroom. Students appreciate the on-demand access of online<br />

classes, for it allows them flexibility in viewing course information at their convenience and as many times as<br />

they wish. This information may include course syllabus and outline, staff profiles and contact information,<br />

examples of projects, and other useful items typically provided to students in a traditional course. Electronic<br />

ISSN 1436-4522 (online) and 1176-3647 (print). © International Forum of Educational Technology & Society (IFETS). The authors and the forum jointly retain the<br />

copyright of the articles. Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies<br />

are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by<br />

others than IFETS must be honoured. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, to republish, to post on servers, or to redistribute to lists, requires prior<br />

specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from the editors at kinshuk@ieee.org.<br />

114

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!