October 2006 Volume 9 Number 4

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Cutshall, S. (2003, March). Century schools, designing smarter, sleeker high-tech facilities. Techniques, 78 (3), 19-21 and 60-61. Davey, K. (1999, Winter). Distance learning demystified. National Forum, 79 (1), 44-46. DeCastell, S., Bryson, M., & Jenson, J. (2003). Object lessons: Critical visions of educational technology, retrieved 30 May 2006 from http://educ.ubc.ca/faculty/bryson/gentech/objectlessons.htm. Feenberg, A. (1999). Whither educational technology? Peer Review, 1 (4), retrieved 30 May 2006 from http://www-rohan.sdsu.edu/faculty/feenberg/peer4.html. Feenberg, A. (1991). Critical theory of technology. New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press. Floyd, B. (1996). Program in Afro-American studies explores the racial gap in access to technology. The Chronicle of Higher Education, 43 (17), A19-A20. Gladieux, L., & Swail, W. (1999). The virtual university & educational opportunity: Issues of equity and access for the next generation. New York: The College Board Publications. Goslee, S. (1998). Losing ground bit by bit: Low income communities in the Information age. Washington DC: The Benton Foundation, retrieved May 30, 2006 from http://www.benton.org/publibrary/losingground/home.html. Kumar, K. (2001). Post-industrial to modern society: New theories of the contemporary world. In Halsey, A. H., Lauder, H., Brown, P. & Wells, A. S. (Eds.) Education: Culture, economy, and society, New York: Oxford University Press, 96-112. Lears, J. (2000). Techno-Utopia? Tikkun, 15 (1), 39. Lenzner, R., & Johnson, S. (1997, March 10). Seeing things as they really are. Forbes, retrieved May 30, 2006 from http://www.forbes.com/forbes/1997/0310/5905122a.html. Marcuse, H. (1964). One-dimensional man. Boston: Beacon Press. McWilliam, E., & Taylor, P. G. (1998, November). Teacher im/material: Challenging the new pedagogies of instructional design. Educational Researcher, 27 (8), 29-34. Natale, R. D. I. (2002). Ensuring quality from a distance. Community College Week, 14 (2), 4. Neal, E. (1999, Winter). Distance education: Prospects and problems. National Forum – Phi Kappa Phi Journal, 79 (1), 40-43. Noble, D. F. (1997). Digital diploma mills: The automation of higher education. First Monday, 3 (1), retrieved May 30, 2006 from http://www.firstmonday.org/issues/issue3_1/noble/. Novak, T., & Hoffman, D. (1998). Bridging the digital divide: The impact of race on computer access Internet use. Vanderbilt University Project 2000, retrieved May 30, 2006 from http://elab.vanderbilt.edu/research/papers/html/manuscripts/race/science.html. Oblinger, D. G., Barone, C. A., & Hawkins, B. L. (2001). Distributed education and its challenges: An overview. Washington DC: American Council on Education Center for Policy Analysis. O'Brien, B. S. & Renner, A. L. (2002, June). Online student retention: Can it be done? Paper presented at the ED-MEDIA 2002 World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia & Telecommunications. Denver, Colorado. O’Malley, J. (1999). Students perceptions of distance learning, online learning and the traditional classroom. Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration. 2 (4), retrieved May 30, 2006 from http://www.westga.edu/~distance/omalley24.html. 171
Oppenheimer, T. (1997, July). The computer delusion. Atlantic Monthly, 280 (1), 45-62. Plato (1961). Collected dialogues. New York: Pantheon Books. Robertson, H. J. (2003a, January). Recycled promises. Phi Delta Kappan, 84 (5), 414-415. Robertson, H. J. (2003b, September/October). Toward a theory of negativity: Teacher education and information and communications technology. Journal of Teacher Education, 54 (4), 280-296. Roblyer, M. D. (1999). Is choice important in distance learning? A study of student motives for taking internetbased courses at the high school and community college levels. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 32 (1), 157-172. Serwatka, J. A. (2002). Improving student performance in distance learning courses. THE Journal, 29 (9), 46-51. Setzer, J. C. & Lewis, L. (2005). Distance education courses for public elementary and secondary school students: 2002-03 (NCES 2005-010). U.S. Department of Education. Washington DC: National Center for Education Statistics. Spitz, R. (2000). Is the Internet for everyone? Art in search of a better connected society. Paper presented at the 10th International Symposium on Electronic Art (ISEA). Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. August 12. Starr. P. (1996, July-August). Computing our way to educational reform. The American Prospect, 27, 50-60. Thor, L. M. (1999). Keeping up with the Joneses. Community College Week, 11 (22), 4. van Schaik, P., Barker, P., & Beckstrand, S. (2003). A comparison of on-campus and online course delivery methods in Southern Nevada. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 40 (1), 5-15. Wendland, M. (2005). School laptop project at risk. Detroit Free Press, retrieved April 18, 2005 from http://www.freep.com/money/tech/mwendland18e_20050418.htm. Wirt, J., Choy, S. P., Rooney, P., Provasnik, S., Sen, A. & Tobin, R. (2004). The condition of education, 2004. National Center for Education Statistics. Washington, DC: US Department of Education. 172
Page 1 and 2:
October 2006 Volume 9 Number 4
Page 3 and 4:
Guidelines for authors Submissions
Page 5 and 6:
How Does Educational Technology Ben
Page 7 and 8:
Adaptivity is one of the most impor
Page 9 and 10:
3. Ease of editing and updating: wh
Page 11 and 12:
Accessible and personalized Learnin
Page 13 and 14:
From this definition, we figured ou
Page 15 and 16:
Verifying contents Figure 3. The pa
Page 17 and 18:
Figure 7. The ISA on line interface
Page 19 and 20:
Adaptive Technology Resource Centre
Page 21 and 22:
World Wide Web Consortium (1999a).
Page 23 and 24:
guiding and supporting environment
Page 25 and 26:
As an example, to improve the acces
Page 27 and 28:
option). Although this finding migh
Page 29 and 30:
of eLearning content and enhance th
Page 31 and 32:
Hodgings, W. & Duval, E. (2002). IE
Page 33 and 34:
the entire course of study. This sy
Page 35 and 36:
information useful for the contextu
Page 37 and 38:
Nr of student 25 20 15 10 5 0 a - w
Page 39 and 40:
Vincenzo, a second year student, ne
Page 41 and 42:
Evaluation Recently embodied conver
Page 43 and 44:
The interaction may be performed on
Page 45 and 46:
Poggi, I., Pelachaud, C., & de Rosi
Page 47 and 48:
Lanzilotti, R., Ardito, C., & Costa
Page 49 and 50:
quality in use, which is measured b
Page 51 and 52:
process of designing high quality c
Page 53 and 54:
eLSE methodology Designers and eval
Page 55 and 56:
Execution phase Execution phase act
Page 57 and 58:
on the inspection process and, cons
Page 59 and 60:
Piccinini, N., & Scollo, G. (2006).
Page 61 and 62:
Answers and reinforcement A.1: Use
Page 63 and 64:
potential project ideas (from pure
Page 65 and 66:
For each column in Table 2, the sum
Page 67 and 68:
educational goals and the various r
Page 69 and 70:
A new computerized Records Manageme
Page 71 and 72:
eflected in artifacts and other str
Page 73 and 74:
any distributed community include b
Page 75 and 76:
message in order to obtain a respon
Page 77 and 78:
Figure 3. Social network after intr
Page 79 and 80:
increased face-to-face collaboratio
Page 81 and 82:
References Bogenrieder, I. (2002).
Page 83 and 84:
Donoghue, S. L. (2006). Institution
Page 85 and 86:
contemplate part-time, rather than
Page 87 and 88:
espective institutions. The primary
Page 89 and 90:
greater flexibility in course selec
Page 91 and 92:
Cost-benefit One distinct benefit o
Page 93 and 94:
Resources The development of online
Page 95 and 96:
courses where it is has little pote
Page 97 and 98:
A fellowship programme, such as the
Page 99 and 100:
Moore, M.G. (1998). Introduction. I
Page 101 and 102:
Software reuse has two dimensions,
Page 103 and 104:
Courseware development process mode
Page 105 and 106:
Didactics analysis This phase consi
Page 107 and 108:
Process didactics design We focus o
Page 109 and 110:
The repository is organized into co
Page 111 and 112:
the analysis and the design phase o
Page 113 and 114:
Figure 12. Weaving content and dida
Page 115 and 116:
complete user-specific (author, ins
Page 117 and 118:
References ADL (Advanced Distribute
Page 119 and 120:
Bender, D. M., & Vredevoogd, J. D.
Page 121 and 122:
(see Figure 2). The incorporation o
Page 123 and 124:
Figure 4: Example of Summary Image
Page 125 and 126: The competitive nature of design cl
Page 127 and 128: Dias, L. B. (1999, November). Integ
Page 129 and 130: materials built into the system. Th
Page 131 and 132: This theory of multimedia learning
Page 133 and 134: E-Tutor (with video). Two weeks aft
Page 135 and 136: empirically tested in TML environme
Page 137 and 138: Rieber, L. P., (1990). Animation in
Page 139 and 140: Appendix B The following 44 items r
Page 141 and 142: Appendix C A Sample of Exam Questio
Page 143 and 144: Appendix D Perceived Usefulness Que
Page 145 and 146: Kirkpatrick, and Peck (2001) have a
Page 147 and 148: 2001). The system thus aims to assi
Page 149 and 150: a strong agreement between the two
Page 151 and 152: of the dynasty. 3. Information on
Page 153 and 154: Comparing works designed using the
Page 155 and 156: Tselios, N., Stoica, A., Maragoudak
Page 157 and 158: strategies during their interaction
Page 159 and 160: P(B|D) is the probability of a netw
Page 161 and 162: Online help adaptation using Bayesi
Page 163 and 164: AUSM that will return the most prob
Page 165 and 166: direct experimentation with a new s
Page 167 and 168: Figure 7. An example of use of the
Page 169 and 170: Cooper, J. & Herskovits, E. (1992).
Page 171 and 172: Goldberg, A. K., & Riemer, F. J. (2
Page 173 and 174: In addition to convenience, propone
Page 175: members increased flexibility. They
Page 179 and 180: The basis of reform in science educ
Page 181 and 182: technology and are not confident in
Page 183 and 184: participants that learning as a gro
Page 185 and 186: A hierarchy of Systems Identifying
Page 187 and 188: the change agents to recognize the
Page 189 and 190: Nonis, A. S., & O’Bannon, B. (200
Page 191 and 192: maintaining the interest levels of
Page 193 and 194: Focus group interviews with our stu
Page 195 and 196: course and again at the end of the
Page 197 and 198: second phase of valuing, commitment
Page 199 and 200: Kinzie, M. B., Whitaker, S. D., Nee
Page 201 and 202: Although this work is based on a st
Page 203 and 204: Website Design The MTP website (www
Page 205 and 206: Researchers, for review and coding
Page 207 and 208: quality that are the focus of the M
Page 209 and 210: Kelley, M. A., Whitaker, S. D., Nee
Page 211 and 212: or underserved populations. For exa
Page 213 and 214: 2004 Baruch College Computer Center
Page 215 and 216: professional-level tools and resour
Page 217 and 218: Third, with the exception of the Om
Page 219 and 220: Hepp, P., Hinostroza, E., Laval, E.
Page 221 and 222: The AccessForAll strategy complemen
Page 223 and 224: of people with special needs, or di
Page 225 and 226: (including where their search for r
Page 227 and 228:
international standard. The ISO pro
Page 229 and 230:
information will be expressed using
Page 231 and 232:
DC Metadata Terms: http://dublincor
Page 233 and 234:
Choquet, C., & Corbière, A. (2006)
Page 235 and 236:
TEL Standards, Specifications and P
Page 237 and 238:
The Resources Management Process ma
Page 239 and 240:
Step 1: Instantiation of the enterp
Page 241 and 242:
Step 5: Instantiation of the techno
Page 243 and 244:
correlation of the different viewpo
Page 245 and 246:
Hummel, H., Manderveld, J., Tatters
Page 247 and 248:
Karagiannidis, C. (2006). Book revi
Page 249 and 250:
Glenn, L. (2006). Book review: Visu
show all

October 2006 Volume 9 Number 4

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?