October 2006 Volume 9 Number 4

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Kerlinger, F. N., (1973). Foundations of Behavioral Research. Holt, Rinehart, and Winston Inc., Chicago, IL. Leidner, D. E. & Jarvenpaa, S. L., (1995). The Use of Information Technology to Enhance Management School Education: A Theoretical View. MIS Quarterly, 19 (3), 265-91. Light, M. & Maybury, M. T., (2002). Personalized Multimedia Information Access. Communications of the ACM, 45 (5), 54-59. Lim, K. H. & Benbasat, I, (2000). The Effect of Multimedia on Perceived Equivocality and Perceived Usefulness of Information Systems. MIS Quarterly, 24 (3), 449-471. Mayer, R. E. & Sims, V. K., (1994). For Whom Is a Picture Worth a Thousand Word? Extensions of a Dual- Coding Theory of Multimedia Learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 86 (3), 389-401. Meece, J., Blumenfeld, P. & Hoyle, R., (1988). Students’ Goal Orientations and Cognitive Engagement in Classroom Activities,” Journal of Educational Psychology, 80 (4), 514-23. Montazemi, A. R. & Wang, F., (1995-a). CBT in Support of Mastery Learning. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 13 (2), 185-205. Montazemi, A.R. & Wang, F., (1995-b). On the effectiveness of Neural Network for Adaptive External Pacing. Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 6 (4) 379-404. Montazemi, A. R. & Wang, S., (1989). The Effects of Modes of Presentation on Decision Making: A Review and Meta-Analysis. Journal of Management Information Systems, 5 (3), 111-127. Nolen, S. (1988). Reasons for Studying: Motivational Orientations and Study Strategies,” Cognition and Instruction, 5 (4), 269-287. O’Brien, J. A., (2001). Management Information Systems; Managing Information Technology in the E-Business Enterprise. New York, NY, McGraw-Hill. Ohlsson, S., (1991). System Hacking meets learning Theory: Reflection on the Goals and Standards of Research in Artificial Intelligence and Education. Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 2 (3), 5-18. Pane, J. F., (1994). Assessment of the ACSE Science Learning Environment and the Impact of Movies and Simulations,” Carnegie Mellon University, CMU-CS-94-162. Pane, J. F., Corbett, T. A., & John, B. E., (1996). Assessing Dynamics in Computer-Based Instruction. In Proceedings of the Conference on Human Factors and Computing Systems, April 13-18, Vancouver, Canada, 197-204. Park, O. & Hopkins, R., (1993). Instructional Conditions for Using Dynamic Visual Displays: A Review. Instructional Science, 21 (6), 427-499. Pintrich, P. R., (1988). A Process-Oriented View of Student Motivation and Cognition. In Stark, J. S. &Mets, L. (Eds.), Improving Teaching and Learning Through Research. New Directions for Institutional Research, San Francisco, CA, Jossey-Bass, 55-70. Pintrich, P. R., (1989). The Dynamic Interplay of Student Motivation and Cognition in the College Classroom. In Ames, C. & Maehr, M. (Eds.), Advances in Motivation and Achievement: Vol. 6. Motivation Enhancing Environments, Greenwich, CT, JAI Press, 117-160,. Pintrich, P. R. & DeGroot, V. E., (1990). Motivational and Self-Regulated Learning Components of Classroom Academic Performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82 (1), 33-40. Pilkington, R. & Grierson, A., (1996). Generating explanation in a simulation-Based Learning Environment. International Journal of Human-Computer studies, 45 (5), 527-551. 131
Rieber, L. P., (1990). Animation in Computer-Based Instruction. Educational Technology Research and Development, 38 (1), 77-86. Retalis, S. & Papasalours, A., (2005). Designing and Generating Educational Adaptive Hypermedia Applications, Educational Technology and Society, 8 (1), 69-79. Silverman, L. K., (2002). Upside-down Brilliance: The Visual-Spatial Learner, DeLeon Publishing, Denver, CO. Simonson, M., (1985). Persuasive Films: A Study of Techniques Used to Change Attitudes. Journal of Teaching and Learning Technologies. 1 (2), 39-48. Simonson, M. & Maushak, N., (1995). Situated Learning, Instructional Technology, and Attitude Change. In McLellan, H. (Ed)., Perspectives on Situated Learning, Cliffs, NJ, Englewood, 46-79. Stone, R., (2001). Virtual Reality for Interactive Training: An Industrial Practitioner’s View Point. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies. 55 (4), 699-711. Taylor, S. & Todd, P., (1995). Understanding Information Technology Usage: A Test of Competing Models. Information Systems Research. 6 (2), 144-176. Tong, A. K. Y. & Angelides, M. C. (2000) An Empirical Model for Tutoring Strategy Selection in Multimedia Tutoring Systems. Decision Support Systems. 29 (1), 31-45. Velayo, R. S., (2000). How do Presentation Modality and Strategy Use Influence Memory for Paired Concepts. Journal of Instructional Psychology. 27 (2), 126-133. Venkatesh, V., (1999). Creation of Favorable User Perceptions: Exploring the Role of Intrinsic Motivation. MIS Quarterly, 23 (2), 239-260. Weinstein, C. E. & Mayer, R. E., (1986). The Teaching of Learning Strategies. In Wittrock, M. (Ed.), Handbook of Research on Teaching, Macmillan, New York, NY, 315-327. Zimbardo, P. & Leippe, M., (1991). The Psychology of Attitude Change and Social Influence. Temple University Press, Philadelphia, PA. Zimmerman, B. & Pons, M., (1988). Construct Validation of a Strategy Model of Student Self-Regulated Learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80 (3), 284-290. 132
Page 1 and 2:
October 2006 Volume 9 Number 4
Page 3 and 4:
Guidelines for authors Submissions
Page 5 and 6:
How Does Educational Technology Ben
Page 7 and 8:
Adaptivity is one of the most impor
Page 9 and 10:
3. Ease of editing and updating: wh
Page 11 and 12:
Accessible and personalized Learnin
Page 13 and 14:
From this definition, we figured ou
Page 15 and 16:
Verifying contents Figure 3. The pa
Page 17 and 18:
Figure 7. The ISA on line interface
Page 19 and 20:
Adaptive Technology Resource Centre
Page 21 and 22:
World Wide Web Consortium (1999a).
Page 23 and 24:
guiding and supporting environment
Page 25 and 26:
As an example, to improve the acces
Page 27 and 28:
option). Although this finding migh
Page 29 and 30:
of eLearning content and enhance th
Page 31 and 32:
Hodgings, W. & Duval, E. (2002). IE
Page 33 and 34:
the entire course of study. This sy
Page 35 and 36:
information useful for the contextu
Page 37 and 38:
Nr of student 25 20 15 10 5 0 a - w
Page 39 and 40:
Vincenzo, a second year student, ne
Page 41 and 42:
Evaluation Recently embodied conver
Page 43 and 44:
The interaction may be performed on
Page 45 and 46:
Poggi, I., Pelachaud, C., & de Rosi
Page 47 and 48:
Lanzilotti, R., Ardito, C., & Costa
Page 49 and 50:
quality in use, which is measured b
Page 51 and 52:
process of designing high quality c
Page 53 and 54:
eLSE methodology Designers and eval
Page 55 and 56:
Execution phase Execution phase act
Page 57 and 58:
on the inspection process and, cons
Page 59 and 60:
Piccinini, N., & Scollo, G. (2006).
Page 61 and 62:
Answers and reinforcement A.1: Use
Page 63 and 64:
potential project ideas (from pure
Page 65 and 66:
For each column in Table 2, the sum
Page 67 and 68:
educational goals and the various r
Page 69 and 70:
A new computerized Records Manageme
Page 71 and 72:
eflected in artifacts and other str
Page 73 and 74:
any distributed community include b
Page 75 and 76:
message in order to obtain a respon
Page 77 and 78:
Figure 3. Social network after intr
Page 79 and 80:
increased face-to-face collaboratio
Page 81 and 82:
References Bogenrieder, I. (2002).
Page 83 and 84:
Donoghue, S. L. (2006). Institution
Page 85 and 86: contemplate part-time, rather than
Page 87 and 88: espective institutions. The primary
Page 89 and 90: greater flexibility in course selec
Page 91 and 92: Cost-benefit One distinct benefit o
Page 93 and 94: Resources The development of online
Page 95 and 96: courses where it is has little pote
Page 97 and 98: A fellowship programme, such as the
Page 99 and 100: Moore, M.G. (1998). Introduction. I
Page 101 and 102: Software reuse has two dimensions,
Page 103 and 104: Courseware development process mode
Page 105 and 106: Didactics analysis This phase consi
Page 107 and 108: Process didactics design We focus o
Page 109 and 110: The repository is organized into co
Page 111 and 112: the analysis and the design phase o
Page 113 and 114: Figure 12. Weaving content and dida
Page 115 and 116: complete user-specific (author, ins
Page 117 and 118: References ADL (Advanced Distribute
Page 119 and 120: Bender, D. M., & Vredevoogd, J. D.
Page 121 and 122: (see Figure 2). The incorporation o
Page 123 and 124: Figure 4: Example of Summary Image
Page 125 and 126: The competitive nature of design cl
Page 127 and 128: Dias, L. B. (1999, November). Integ
Page 129 and 130: materials built into the system. Th
Page 131 and 132: This theory of multimedia learning
Page 133 and 134: E-Tutor (with video). Two weeks aft
Page 135: empirically tested in TML environme
Page 139 and 140: Appendix B The following 44 items r
Page 141 and 142: Appendix C A Sample of Exam Questio
Page 143 and 144: Appendix D Perceived Usefulness Que
Page 145 and 146: Kirkpatrick, and Peck (2001) have a
Page 147 and 148: 2001). The system thus aims to assi
Page 149 and 150: a strong agreement between the two
Page 151 and 152: of the dynasty. 3. Information on
Page 153 and 154: Comparing works designed using the
Page 155 and 156: Tselios, N., Stoica, A., Maragoudak
Page 157 and 158: strategies during their interaction
Page 159 and 160: P(B|D) is the probability of a netw
Page 161 and 162: Online help adaptation using Bayesi
Page 163 and 164: AUSM that will return the most prob
Page 165 and 166: direct experimentation with a new s
Page 167 and 168: Figure 7. An example of use of the
Page 169 and 170: Cooper, J. & Herskovits, E. (1992).
Page 171 and 172: Goldberg, A. K., & Riemer, F. J. (2
Page 173 and 174: In addition to convenience, propone
Page 175 and 176: members increased flexibility. They
Page 177 and 178: Oppenheimer, T. (1997, July). The c
Page 179 and 180: The basis of reform in science educ
Page 181 and 182: technology and are not confident in
Page 183 and 184: participants that learning as a gro
Page 185 and 186: A hierarchy of Systems Identifying
Page 187 and 188:
the change agents to recognize the
Page 189 and 190:
Nonis, A. S., & O’Bannon, B. (200
Page 191 and 192:
maintaining the interest levels of
Page 193 and 194:
Focus group interviews with our stu
Page 195 and 196:
course and again at the end of the
Page 197 and 198:
second phase of valuing, commitment
Page 199 and 200:
Kinzie, M. B., Whitaker, S. D., Nee
Page 201 and 202:
Although this work is based on a st
Page 203 and 204:
Website Design The MTP website (www
Page 205 and 206:
Researchers, for review and coding
Page 207 and 208:
quality that are the focus of the M
Page 209 and 210:
Kelley, M. A., Whitaker, S. D., Nee
Page 211 and 212:
or underserved populations. For exa
Page 213 and 214:
2004 Baruch College Computer Center
Page 215 and 216:
professional-level tools and resour
Page 217 and 218:
Third, with the exception of the Om
Page 219 and 220:
Hepp, P., Hinostroza, E., Laval, E.
Page 221 and 222:
The AccessForAll strategy complemen
Page 223 and 224:
of people with special needs, or di
Page 225 and 226:
(including where their search for r
Page 227 and 228:
international standard. The ISO pro
Page 229 and 230:
information will be expressed using
Page 231 and 232:
DC Metadata Terms: http://dublincor
Page 233 and 234:
Choquet, C., & Corbière, A. (2006)
Page 235 and 236:
TEL Standards, Specifications and P
Page 237 and 238:
The Resources Management Process ma
Page 239 and 240:
Step 1: Instantiation of the enterp
Page 241 and 242:
Step 5: Instantiation of the techno
Page 243 and 244:
correlation of the different viewpo
Page 245 and 246:
Hummel, H., Manderveld, J., Tatters
Page 247 and 248:
Karagiannidis, C. (2006). Book revi
Page 249 and 250:
Glenn, L. (2006). Book review: Visu
show all

October 2006 Volume 9 Number 4

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?