02.04.2013 Views

ofthe SAME TREE

ofthe SAME TREE

ofthe SAME TREE

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

proceeds to recount the fortunes of this family while completely omitting<br />

any further mention of the other two brothers. 88 There is, however, another<br />

popular version of the Sejarah Melayu, a hybrid text known as the Shellabear<br />

recension, which gives paramountcy to the prince who became ruler of<br />

Minangkabau. In this version Sang Sapurba, the prince who becomes ruler in<br />

Minangkabau, is depicted as the father of Sri Tri Buana, thus demonstrating the<br />

primacy of the Minangkabau royal house over the Malayu Melaka dynasty. 89<br />

The process of unraveling Minangkabau ethnicity from that of the<br />

Malayu was not yet complete by the late eighteenth century, which may<br />

explain why European observers continued to regard the Minangkabau and<br />

the Malayu as one. William Marsden, who wrote the first detailed account of<br />

Sumatra in a European language in 1783, explained that the name “Malayu”<br />

referred not only to those on Sumatra but those living on the opposite coast<br />

of the Straits of Melaka and on the numerous surrounding islands, as well as<br />

to “every Mussulman [Muslim] speaking the Malayan as his proper language,<br />

and either belonging to, or claiming descent from, the ancient kingdom of<br />

Menangkabau; wherever the place of his residence may be.” 90 Later Dutch<br />

and English commentators reinforced the view of Minangkabau as the cradle<br />

of Malayu civilization, which then spread to the “Malay” Peninsula and elsewhere<br />

in the archipelago. 91<br />

While external observers continued to equate the Minangkabau with the<br />

Malayu, a separate identity was already well on its way by the second half of the<br />

seventeenth century. The sense of being Minangkabau was being strengthened<br />

by the activities of the rulers of Pagaruyung and was being spread through its<br />

royal missives and emissaries. A clue to their efficacy lies in the reputation<br />

of Pagaruyung rulers as repositories of extraordinary sacral powers and as<br />

mother/father figures to all Minangkabau (anak Minangkabau). 92 Such powers<br />

were believed to be conveyed by Pagaruyung’s letters and by messengers<br />

described as “sons” of the Pagaruyung ruler. On the west coast of Sumatra<br />

these royal princes were able to raise armies and even pose a military threat to<br />

communities. 93 Further afield in the upper reaches of rivers in the interior and<br />

the downstream areas of east Sumatra such royal personages had to rely on<br />

the credence of the Minangkabau communities for their support. The exceptional<br />

success of such messengers in the late seventeenth and early eighteenth<br />

centuries is testimony to the real influence exerted by the Pagaruyung court<br />

and to its success in forming a distinctive Minangkabau identity.<br />

100 Chapter 3<br />

Pagaruyung Emissaries in the Ethnicization Process<br />

In 1677 the Minangkabau settlements of Rembau, Sungai Ujong, and Naning<br />

(then under the VOC) requested and received a ruler called Raja Ibrahim from

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!