10.04.2013 Views

The Design of Modern Steel Bridges - TEDI

The Design of Modern Steel Bridges - TEDI

The Design of Modern Steel Bridges - TEDI

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

eam, with an effective area equal to the gross area <strong>of</strong> the slab between the<br />

steel girders divided by the modular ratio (i.e. the ratio between Young’s<br />

moduli <strong>of</strong> steel and concrete). Sometimes the transverse girders are unconnected<br />

to the concrete deck; the grillage analysis in such cases must take into<br />

account two separate sets <strong>of</strong> transverse members, i.e. the concrete slab and the<br />

unconnected steel transverse girders. Shear deformation is generally ignored in<br />

grillage analysis.<br />

Open cross-sections like I-beams have negligible torsional stiffness. <strong>The</strong><br />

torsional stiffness <strong>of</strong> a concrete slab is also generally ignored, but may be taken<br />

into account by assuming the St Venant torsional constant as d 3 /6 per unit<br />

width in the two orthogonal directions, when d is the slab depth.<br />

Computer programs for grillage analysis can also easily deal with multiplespan<br />

continuous structures with constant or varying moments <strong>of</strong> inertia <strong>of</strong> the<br />

longitudinal girders. <strong>The</strong> hogging moment over intermediate supports <strong>of</strong> the<br />

longitudinal girders may cause transverse cracking <strong>of</strong> the concrete slab in these<br />

regions, thus causing a reduction in the effective moments <strong>of</strong> inertia. This can<br />

be dealt with in one <strong>of</strong> the following two ways:<br />

(1) A new distribution <strong>of</strong> bending moments may be determined by neglecting<br />

the concrete in the calculation <strong>of</strong> the moment <strong>of</strong> inertia <strong>of</strong> the beams over<br />

the length over supports where tensile stress in concrete was found to<br />

exceed 10% <strong>of</strong> its specified 28 day compressive strength, or over, say,<br />

15% <strong>of</strong> the span lengths on each side <strong>of</strong> the support.<br />

(2) <strong>The</strong> sagging moments in the adjacent spans are increased, without reducing<br />

the hogging moment; the percentage increase is specified in BS<br />

5400[13] as 40 times the ratio <strong>of</strong> the tensile stress in concrete to its<br />

specified 28 day compressive strength.<br />

In the AASHTO specification[1] empirical methods are authorised for<br />

obtaining the transverse distribution <strong>of</strong> wheel loads. For internal longitudinal<br />

beams with spacing S (metres), the bending moment may be calculated by<br />

(1) taking S/1.676 fraction <strong>of</strong> wheel loads, if S < 4.267 m<br />

(2) taking the flooring to act as a simple span between longitudinal beams, if<br />

S > 4.267 m.<br />

For external longitudinal beams, the flooring may be assumed to act as a<br />

simple span between longitudinal beams, except that, where there are four or<br />

more beams, the fraction <strong>of</strong> wheel loads shall not be less than:<br />

(1) S/1.676, where S 4 1.829 m<br />

(2) S/(1.219 þ 0.25S), where 1.829 < S < 4.267.<br />

Rolled Beam and Plate Girder <strong>Design</strong> 95<br />

Shear forces in all beams may be calculated in the same way as bending<br />

moments, except that, for calculating end shear or reaction, the effect <strong>of</strong><br />

a wheel load placed near that end <strong>of</strong> a beam shall always be calculated by<br />

assuming the flooring to act as a simple span. One condition for adopting this

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!