The Design of Modern Steel Bridges - TEDI
The Design of Modern Steel Bridges - TEDI
The Design of Modern Steel Bridges - TEDI
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
166 <strong>The</strong> <strong>Design</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Modern</strong> <strong>Steel</strong> <strong>Bridges</strong><br />
This buckling mode <strong>of</strong> the whole stiffened flange will involve interactive<br />
buckling <strong>of</strong> both the longitudinal and the transverse stiffeners; this buckling<br />
mode will not only be sensitive to the initial imperfections <strong>of</strong> the stiffeners, but<br />
will be <strong>of</strong> a very ‘brittle’ nature, i.e. there will be a sudden and substantial<br />
shedding <strong>of</strong> the load at the onset <strong>of</strong> buckling. To avoid this catastrophic phenomenon,<br />
the transverse stiffeners are normally designed to be sufficiently stiff<br />
not to buckle when the longitudinal stiffeners do. Further reasons for making the<br />
transverse stiffeners sufficiently stiff are that on the top flange they have to<br />
support without large deflection any locally applied axle loadings <strong>of</strong> vehicles,<br />
and in box girders they form components <strong>of</strong> the internal crossframes or diaphragms<br />
which are provided to prevent distortion <strong>of</strong> the box cross-section. With<br />
such rigid transverse stiffeners the buckling <strong>of</strong> the stiffened flange will have one<br />
half-wave in the longitudinal direction between adjacent transverse stiffeners.<br />
<strong>The</strong> rigidities Dx; Dy and H will thus not involve the geometric properties <strong>of</strong> the<br />
transverse stiffener and will be given by<br />
where<br />
Dx ¼ EIx<br />
b 0 , Dy<br />
Et<br />
¼<br />
3<br />
12ð1 v2Þ H ¼ Gt3<br />
6<br />
1<br />
þ<br />
2 vyDx þ 1<br />
2 vxDy þ GJx<br />
2b 0<br />
Ix ¼ second moment <strong>of</strong> area <strong>of</strong> a longitudinal stiffener<br />
b 0 ¼ spacing <strong>of</strong> longitudinal stiffeners<br />
t ¼ flange plate thickness<br />
v ¼ Poisson’s ratio <strong>of</strong> the flange plate<br />
Jx ¼ the torsional constant <strong>of</strong> the longitudinal stiffener<br />
vx ¼ v½b 0 t=ðb 0 t þ AsxÞŠ<br />
vy ¼ v<br />
Asx ¼ cross-sectional area <strong>of</strong> one longitudinal stiffener.<br />
9<br />
>=<br />
>;<br />
ð6:6Þ<br />
For an ideal orthotropic plate, vyDx ¼ vxDy. In the case <strong>of</strong> a compression flange<br />
discretely stiffened by longitudinal stiffeners between rigid transverse stiffeners,<br />
this equality is not satisfied and the contribution <strong>of</strong> Dx towards the<br />
torsional rigidity H is doubtful. Hence it is safe to take<br />
H ¼ Gt3<br />
6 þ vxDy þ GJx<br />
2b 0<br />
ð6:7Þ<br />
From equation (6.4), the total critical longitudinal compressive force in the<br />
whole orthotropic panel will be<br />
scrobt ¼ p2<br />
b<br />
Dx<br />
f 2 þ Dyf 2 þ 2H<br />
<strong>The</strong> real orthotropic flange has discrete flange stiffeners, each <strong>of</strong> crosssectional<br />
area Asx. If the width <strong>of</strong> the orthotropic flange panel between adjacent