10.04.2013 Views

The Design of Modern Steel Bridges - TEDI

The Design of Modern Steel Bridges - TEDI

The Design of Modern Steel Bridges - TEDI

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

166 <strong>The</strong> <strong>Design</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Modern</strong> <strong>Steel</strong> <strong>Bridges</strong><br />

This buckling mode <strong>of</strong> the whole stiffened flange will involve interactive<br />

buckling <strong>of</strong> both the longitudinal and the transverse stiffeners; this buckling<br />

mode will not only be sensitive to the initial imperfections <strong>of</strong> the stiffeners, but<br />

will be <strong>of</strong> a very ‘brittle’ nature, i.e. there will be a sudden and substantial<br />

shedding <strong>of</strong> the load at the onset <strong>of</strong> buckling. To avoid this catastrophic phenomenon,<br />

the transverse stiffeners are normally designed to be sufficiently stiff<br />

not to buckle when the longitudinal stiffeners do. Further reasons for making the<br />

transverse stiffeners sufficiently stiff are that on the top flange they have to<br />

support without large deflection any locally applied axle loadings <strong>of</strong> vehicles,<br />

and in box girders they form components <strong>of</strong> the internal crossframes or diaphragms<br />

which are provided to prevent distortion <strong>of</strong> the box cross-section. With<br />

such rigid transverse stiffeners the buckling <strong>of</strong> the stiffened flange will have one<br />

half-wave in the longitudinal direction between adjacent transverse stiffeners.<br />

<strong>The</strong> rigidities Dx; Dy and H will thus not involve the geometric properties <strong>of</strong> the<br />

transverse stiffener and will be given by<br />

where<br />

Dx ¼ EIx<br />

b 0 , Dy<br />

Et<br />

¼<br />

3<br />

12ð1 v2Þ H ¼ Gt3<br />

6<br />

1<br />

þ<br />

2 vyDx þ 1<br />

2 vxDy þ GJx<br />

2b 0<br />

Ix ¼ second moment <strong>of</strong> area <strong>of</strong> a longitudinal stiffener<br />

b 0 ¼ spacing <strong>of</strong> longitudinal stiffeners<br />

t ¼ flange plate thickness<br />

v ¼ Poisson’s ratio <strong>of</strong> the flange plate<br />

Jx ¼ the torsional constant <strong>of</strong> the longitudinal stiffener<br />

vx ¼ v½b 0 t=ðb 0 t þ AsxÞŠ<br />

vy ¼ v<br />

Asx ¼ cross-sectional area <strong>of</strong> one longitudinal stiffener.<br />

9<br />

>=<br />

>;<br />

ð6:6Þ<br />

For an ideal orthotropic plate, vyDx ¼ vxDy. In the case <strong>of</strong> a compression flange<br />

discretely stiffened by longitudinal stiffeners between rigid transverse stiffeners,<br />

this equality is not satisfied and the contribution <strong>of</strong> Dx towards the<br />

torsional rigidity H is doubtful. Hence it is safe to take<br />

H ¼ Gt3<br />

6 þ vxDy þ GJx<br />

2b 0<br />

ð6:7Þ<br />

From equation (6.4), the total critical longitudinal compressive force in the<br />

whole orthotropic panel will be<br />

scrobt ¼ p2<br />

b<br />

Dx<br />

f 2 þ Dyf 2 þ 2H<br />

<strong>The</strong> real orthotropic flange has discrete flange stiffeners, each <strong>of</strong> crosssectional<br />

area Asx. If the width <strong>of</strong> the orthotropic flange panel between adjacent

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!