10.04.2013 Views

The Design of Modern Steel Bridges - TEDI

The Design of Modern Steel Bridges - TEDI

The Design of Modern Steel Bridges - TEDI

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Table 3.6 Typical values <strong>of</strong> U and P for various bridge lengths<br />

Loads on <strong>Bridges</strong> 61<br />

Loaded length (m) P (kN) U (kN/m) for percentage <strong>of</strong> HGV in traffic<br />

7.5% 30% 100%<br />

15.25 0 38 38 38<br />

122 320 10.4 13.9 17.1<br />

488 534 7.1 10.8 12.3<br />

1950 747 5.8 9.9 10.5<br />

1977, goods moved by road, measured by tonne–km, virtually doubled.<br />

Statistics <strong>of</strong> vehicle population by gross weight indicate that the number <strong>of</strong><br />

vehicles with gross weight greater than 28 tonnes increased from an insignificant<br />

number in 1962 to 90 000 in 1977. Vehicle population with gross weight<br />

less than 11 tonnes fell substantially in that period, whereas those between 11<br />

and 28 tonnes also increased, but the rate <strong>of</strong> increase <strong>of</strong> over 28 tonnes<br />

completely outstripped that <strong>of</strong> the others.<br />

This is the context in which a thorough review <strong>of</strong> design for live loading <strong>of</strong><br />

bridges was undertaken in early 1980s. <strong>The</strong>se reviews took into account the<br />

growth <strong>of</strong> traffic and change in traffic mix predicted for the 1990s, and produced<br />

new proposals for loading for the entire range <strong>of</strong> loaded lengths. For the<br />

shorter spans, the review was primarily on a deterministic basis, although an<br />

element <strong>of</strong> probability for illegal overloading and lateral bunching was taken<br />

into account. <strong>The</strong> extreme loading obtained from this part <strong>of</strong> the exercise was<br />

considered to be just possible in a rare event, i.e. to be used as design load in<br />

the ultimate limit state without multiplying by any further partial safety factor.<br />

<strong>The</strong> results were thus divided by 1.5 to get nominal loading. For the longer<br />

spans, a fully statistical basis was used to derive a characteristic loading, i.e.<br />

95% probability <strong>of</strong> not being exceeded in 120 years. <strong>The</strong> nominal loading for<br />

design, i.e. a 120 year return period load, was taken as the characteristic loading<br />

divided by 1.2. A level 3 overall safety analysis was then performed to obtain<br />

an appropriate partial safety factor for loading consistent with the assurance<br />

that a structure will not have more than 1 in a million chance <strong>of</strong> collapse in<br />

service in its lifetime. <strong>The</strong> partial safety factor on the nominal load was found<br />

to be approximately 1.5, thus confirming the value already in BS 5400. On top<br />

<strong>of</strong> the nominal design loading derived in this fashion, a 10% allowance for<br />

future contingencies was provided throughout the whole span range. On a<br />

multi-lane bridge deck the loading over the third lane onwards was increased<br />

from 33% to 60% <strong>of</strong> the above design load in the first two lanes.<br />

In 1986 the European Commission decided to adopt a single regulation for<br />

maximum vehicle weights and dimensions throughout all the countries belonging<br />

to the European Economic Community. For the UK this meant an increase<br />

in the maximum axle weight from 10.5 to 11.5 tonnes, and in the maximum

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!