10.04.2013 Views

The Design of Modern Steel Bridges - TEDI

The Design of Modern Steel Bridges - TEDI

The Design of Modern Steel Bridges - TEDI

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

62 <strong>The</strong> <strong>Design</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Modern</strong> <strong>Steel</strong> <strong>Bridges</strong><br />

vehicle weight from 38 to 40 tonnes. <strong>The</strong> increase in the maximum axle weight<br />

required a slight increase in the previously derived design HA loading for the<br />

short spans. <strong>The</strong> increase in the maximum vehicle weight was, however, <strong>of</strong>fset<br />

by an increase in the minimum axle spacing, thus requiring no further increase<br />

in the design loading.<br />

In the new HA loading[9], the uniformly distributed load was increased to<br />

W ¼ 336L 0:67<br />

for L450<br />

¼ 36L 0:1<br />

for 50 < L41600<br />

where L is the loaded length in metres and W is the load per metre in kN. <strong>The</strong><br />

new HA loading is shown in Fig. 3.5 on which are also shown the HA loading<br />

in BS 153[4] and BS 5400[2]. <strong>The</strong> increase for all loaded lengths is obvious,<br />

but in the middle range <strong>of</strong> 25–60 m it is not very substantial. For the shorter<br />

loaded lengths, the apparently substantial increase is not in fact critical, since<br />

30 units <strong>of</strong> HB loading produces worse loading effects, even after allowing for<br />

the appropriate partial factors. For loaded lengths above, say 60 m, dead load<br />

starts to become more dominant than live load, and hence the total increase in<br />

loading will not be as much as indicated in this graph.<br />

Figure 3.5 British bridge loading.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!