The Design of Modern Steel Bridges - TEDI
The Design of Modern Steel Bridges - TEDI
The Design of Modern Steel Bridges - TEDI
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
62 <strong>The</strong> <strong>Design</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Modern</strong> <strong>Steel</strong> <strong>Bridges</strong><br />
vehicle weight from 38 to 40 tonnes. <strong>The</strong> increase in the maximum axle weight<br />
required a slight increase in the previously derived design HA loading for the<br />
short spans. <strong>The</strong> increase in the maximum vehicle weight was, however, <strong>of</strong>fset<br />
by an increase in the minimum axle spacing, thus requiring no further increase<br />
in the design loading.<br />
In the new HA loading[9], the uniformly distributed load was increased to<br />
W ¼ 336L 0:67<br />
for L450<br />
¼ 36L 0:1<br />
for 50 < L41600<br />
where L is the loaded length in metres and W is the load per metre in kN. <strong>The</strong><br />
new HA loading is shown in Fig. 3.5 on which are also shown the HA loading<br />
in BS 153[4] and BS 5400[2]. <strong>The</strong> increase for all loaded lengths is obvious,<br />
but in the middle range <strong>of</strong> 25–60 m it is not very substantial. For the shorter<br />
loaded lengths, the apparently substantial increase is not in fact critical, since<br />
30 units <strong>of</strong> HB loading produces worse loading effects, even after allowing for<br />
the appropriate partial factors. For loaded lengths above, say 60 m, dead load<br />
starts to become more dominant than live load, and hence the total increase in<br />
loading will not be as much as indicated in this graph.<br />
Figure 3.5 British bridge loading.