10.04.2013 Views

The Design of Modern Steel Bridges - TEDI

The Design of Modern Steel Bridges - TEDI

The Design of Modern Steel Bridges - TEDI

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

82 <strong>The</strong> <strong>Design</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Modern</strong> <strong>Steel</strong> <strong>Bridges</strong><br />

will thus be proportional to<br />

e ð1=2Þo2 R e ð1=2Þo2 S ¼ e ð1=2Þðo2 R þo2 S Þ<br />

In the space <strong>of</strong> the reduced variables, the locus <strong>of</strong> the point <strong>of</strong> equal frequency<br />

will thus be a circle around the origin, larger radius representing lower frequency.<br />

<strong>The</strong>se circles are shown in Fig. 4.3.<br />

In Fig. 4.3 a vector OA is drawn from the origin normal to the failure<br />

boundary. OA is thus the shortest distance from the origin to the failure line.<br />

Point A represents the most likely set <strong>of</strong> values <strong>of</strong> oR and oS for the occurrence<br />

<strong>of</strong> failure and is thus called the ‘design point’. It can be shown that the length<br />

<strong>of</strong> the vector OA is given by<br />

mR mS<br />

ffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi<br />

s2 R þ s2 p<br />

S<br />

and is thus numerically equal to the reliability index b.<br />

<strong>The</strong> coordinates <strong>of</strong> the point A in the space <strong>of</strong> oR and oS can be shown to be<br />

ðmR mSÞsR<br />

ðs2 R þ s2 SÞ , ðmR mSÞsS<br />

ðs2 R þ s2 SÞ which can also be expressed as ðaRb, aSbÞ when<br />

aR ¼<br />

@g<br />

@oR<br />

@g<br />

@oR<br />

2<br />

þ @g<br />

@oS<br />

2 1=2 , aS ¼<br />

@g<br />

@oR<br />

@g<br />

@oS<br />

2<br />

þ @g<br />

@oS<br />

2 1=2<br />

<strong>The</strong> design <strong>of</strong> new structures can be performed by considering any point on<br />

the horizontal axis <strong>of</strong> R or S in Fig. 4.1 and its associated probability density<br />

values <strong>of</strong> R and S. Alternatively, the distance <strong>of</strong> the point from the mean values<br />

<strong>of</strong> R and S in multiples <strong>of</strong> the respective standard deviation may be used. For<br />

the sake <strong>of</strong> convenience, the ‘design point’ can be chosen for this purpose, as<br />

this point represents the most likely situation at failure.<br />

Converting the reduced variables oR and oS to basic variables R and S, the<br />

values <strong>of</strong> the latter at the ‘design point’ are<br />

Rd ¼ mR þ oRsR ¼ mR þ aRbsR<br />

Sd ¼ mS þ oSsS ¼ mS þ aSbsS<br />

Usually the resistance and action-effect variables R and S <strong>of</strong> a structure are<br />

functions <strong>of</strong> a number <strong>of</strong> variables x 1, x 2, ..., xn, and the probability density<br />

functions f(R) and f(S) depend upon the probability density functions <strong>of</strong> the<br />

individual variables x 1, etc. and how they are related in the functions R and S.<br />

Some <strong>of</strong> the variables may be common to both, causing some correlation; this<br />

has to be taken into account by modifying the statistical parameters by the<br />

correlation coefficient. All the basic variables may be replaced by a new set <strong>of</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!