The Design of Modern Steel Bridges - TEDI
The Design of Modern Steel Bridges - TEDI
The Design of Modern Steel Bridges - TEDI
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
40 <strong>The</strong> <strong>Design</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Modern</strong> <strong>Steel</strong> <strong>Bridges</strong><br />
parameters; for example, for the determination <strong>of</strong> yield stress British Standard<br />
BS 18[1] limits the rate <strong>of</strong> straining at the time <strong>of</strong> yielding to 0.0025 per<br />
second; when this cannot be achieved by direct control, the initial elastic<br />
stressing rate has to be controlled within the values stipulated for different<br />
testing machine stiffnesses.<br />
Within a zone <strong>of</strong>, say, 50 mm from a rolled edge, yield stress may be up to<br />
15% higher than in the remainder <strong>of</strong> a plate. Yield stress in the transverse direction<br />
may be approximately 21 2 % less than in the longitudinal direction <strong>of</strong> rolling.<br />
<strong>The</strong> yield stress (and also the tensile strength) varies with the chemical<br />
composition <strong>of</strong> the steel, the amount <strong>of</strong> mechanical working that the steel<br />
undergoes during the rolling process and the heat treatment and/or cold<br />
working applied after rolling. Thinner sections produced by an increased<br />
amount <strong>of</strong> rolling have higher yield stresses; even in one cross-section <strong>of</strong> a<br />
rolled section the thinner parts have higher yield stresses than the thicker parts.<br />
Heat treatment or cold working may remove the yield phenomenon.<br />
<strong>The</strong> stress–strain behaviour under compression is normally not determined<br />
by tests and is assumed to be identical to the tensile behaviour. In reality the<br />
compressive yield stress may be approximately 5% higher than the tensile<br />
yield stress. <strong>The</strong> state <strong>of</strong> stress at any point in a structural member may be a<br />
combination <strong>of</strong> normal stresses in orthogonal directions plus shear stresses in<br />
these planes. Several classical theories for yielding in three-dimensional stress<br />
states have been postulated; the theory that has been found most suitable for<br />
ductile material with similar strength in compression and tension is based on<br />
the maximum distortion energy and attributed variously to Huber, von Mises<br />
and Hencky. According to this theory, in a two-dimensional stress state yielding<br />
takes place when normal stresses s1 and s2 on the two orthogonal planes<br />
and shear stress t on these planes satisfy the following condition:<br />
s 2 1 þ s2 2<br />
s1s2 þ 3t 2 ¼ s 2 y<br />
where sy is the measured yield stress <strong>of</strong> the material. It may be noted that,<br />
according to this theory: (i) the<br />
pffiffiffi yield stress ty in pure shear, i.e. without any<br />
normal stresses, is equal to sy/ 3 and (ii) in the biaxial stress state, the normal<br />
stress in one direction may reach values higher than the measured uniaxial<br />
yield stress sy before yielding takes place; e.g. if s1 ¼ 2s2, yielding will not<br />
take place until s 1 reaches approximately 15% higher than the uniaxial yield<br />
stress <strong>of</strong> the material.<br />
<strong>The</strong> other elastic properties that influence the state <strong>of</strong> stress at any point are:<br />
(1) Young’s modulus E, which is in the range 200 to 210 kN/mm 2 .<br />
(2) <strong>The</strong> shear modulus or modulus <strong>of</strong> rigidity G, which is the ratio between<br />
shearing stress and shear strain and is in the range 77 to 80 kN/mm 2 .<br />
(3) Poisson’s ratio m, which is the ratio between lateral strain and longitudinal<br />
strain caused by a longitudinally applied stress and is usually<br />
taken as 0.3 for structural steel.