206 <strong>The</strong> <strong>Design</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Modern</strong> <strong>Steel</strong> <strong>Bridges</strong> orthotropic buckling, 165, 168, 180 orthotropic steel decks, 32, 165, 168, 184, 185 Ostapenko A and Chern C, 130, 131 out-<strong>of</strong>-plane imperfections, 124 Paine, Tom, 2 parallel-strand cable, 193 parallel-wire cable, 194 parallel-wire strands, 193, 194 Parana river bridges, Argentina, 28, 193 partial safety factors, 86–89 Pasco–Kennewick bridge, USA, 194 percentage elongation, 41 permissible stress, 76 Perry-Robertson, 103, 164 Pia Maria bridge, Portugal, 15 plastic modulus, 104, 105, 148 plastic moment <strong>of</strong> resistance, 99, 104 Poisson’s ratio, 40 Pont de Normandie, France, 29, 187 post-buckling behaviour/strength, 109, 116, 118, 120, 137 Prandtl–Reuss, 126 Pritchard, Thomas, 2 probability density function, 79, 82 probability <strong>of</strong> failure, 80, 84–86, 88, 89 probability, 78, 80 pro<strong>of</strong> stress, 38 Quebec bridge, Canada, 13 Queen Elizabeth II Bridge, UK, 29 Queensboro bridge, USA, 13 Rainbow bridge, Niagara, 16 Rankine, W.J.M., 12 Redpath & Brown, 183 reliability index, 80, 82–86 Rennie, 8 residual stresses, 121–124, 127, 161, 162 Rhine bridge, Germany, Rees, 26, 186 rigid-frame bridges, 1 Rion–Antirion Bridge, Greece, 30 Rio-Niteroi bridge, Brazil, 36 Rockey, K., Evans, H., & Porter, D., 131, 135 Roebling, John, 9, 10, 11, 24 Roebling, Washington, 10, 11, 24 Rokko bridge, Japan, 28 ropes, 191 Runyang South Bridge, China, 23 safety factor, 76 Saltash bridge, UK, 10 San Mateo Hayward bridge, USA, 33 Sava bridge, Yugoslavia, 28 Sava road bridge, Yugoslavia, 32 Schuylkill bridge, USA, 2, 9 Secant modulus <strong>of</strong> cable stays, 198 Second Severn Crossing, UK, 29 Serrell, 9 serviceability limit state, 75 Severins bridge, Germany, 25, 184 Severn bridge, UK, 21, 24 Seyrig, T., 15 Sfalasse bridge, Italy, 33 Shanghai–Chongming Bridge, China, 30 shear centre, 96, 100 shear modulus, 40 Siemens, 10 Skarnsundet bridge, Norway, 187 Southwark bridge, UK, 3 spiral strands, 190 St Louis bridge, USA, 10, 15 St Nazair bridge, France, 28 St Venant, B., 111, 113 steel bridges, 10 steel cables, 11, 12, 188 Steinman, David, 17, 20 Stephenson, George, 7 Stephenson, Robert, 8 stiffening girder, 9, 25, 185, 186, 188 Stonecutters Bridge, Hong Kong, 29 Storebelt Bridge, Denmark, 23 Strauss, J. B., 17 strength properties, 38 Stretto di Rande bridge, Spain, 28
Strömsund bridge, Sweden, 25, 184, 192 Sunshine Skyway, USA, 30 suspension bridges, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 9, 16–23 Sutong Bridge, China, 30 Sydney Harbour bridge, Australia, 16 Tacoma Narrows bridge, USA, 17, 20 Tagus bridge, Portugal, 20 Tamar Suspension Bridge, 19 Tampico bridge, Mexico, 29 Tancarville bridge, France, 20 Tancred, Arrol & Co., 13 Tangent modulus <strong>of</strong> cable stays, 198 Tatara Bridge, Japan, 29, 186 Tay bridge, UK, 11 Telford, Thomas, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8 tensile strength, 38, 40, 41 tension field, 119, 128, 130, 144–146, 150, 152 <strong>The</strong>odor Heuss bridge, Germany, 25, 184 thermal forces, 68 three-moment theorem, 173 Tin Kau Bridge, Hong Kong, 30 Tjörn bridge, Sweden, 28 torsional oscillation, 19 torsional stiffness/rigidity, 25, 95, 97, 106, 137, 141, 165 transverse distribution, 95 truss bridges, 8, 11 trussed cantilever, 12, 13, 17 Tsing Lung Bridge, Hong Kong, 23 Tsing Ma Bridge, Hong Kong, 23 Tsurumi Koro bridge, Japan, 187 tube bridges, 8 ultimate limit state, 75 Vauxhall bridge, UK, 3, 5 Verantius, Faustus, 183 Verrazano Narrows bridge, USA, 20 Viaur Viaduct, France, 16 Volta Bridge, Africa, 15 von Karman, 19, 126 Waal bridge, Holland, 28 Waddell, 11 Wagner, H., 128, 133 warping rigidity, 97, 106 weathering steel, 38, 45 weldability, 44 welding residual stress, 121–124, 127, 161, 162 Wernwag, Lewis, 9 Western European steel, 47 Wheeling bridge, USA, 9 Williamsburg bridge, USA, 17 wind drag, 11 wind gust, 65 wind loading, 64 Windmill Bridge, Newark, UK, 34 Woodruff, Glen, 19 wrought iron, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 15, 183 Wye bridge, UK, 28, 135 Yamatogawa bridge, Japan, 193 Yangpu bridge, China, 187 yield stress, 38, 39 Yokohama bridge, Japan, 29, 193 Young’s modulus, 38, 40, 98, 150, 191 Zambezi bridge, Zambia, 16 Zoo bridge, Germany, 32 Index 207
- Page 1:
The Design of Modern Steel Bridges
- Page 5 and 6:
The Design of Modern Steel Bridges
- Page 7 and 8:
Contents Preface vii Acknowledgemen
- Page 9 and 10:
Preface Bridges are great symbols o
- Page 11:
Acknowledgements The figures in Cha
- Page 14 and 15:
2 The Design of Modern Steel Bridge
- Page 16 and 17:
4 The Design of Modern Steel Bridge
- Page 18 and 19:
6 The Design of Modern Steel Bridge
- Page 20 and 21:
8 The Design of Modern Steel Bridge
- Page 22 and 23:
10 The Design of Modern Steel Bridg
- Page 24 and 25:
12 The Design of Modern Steel Bridg
- Page 26 and 27:
14 The Design of Modern Steel Bridg
- Page 28 and 29:
16 The Design of Modern Steel Bridg
- Page 30 and 31:
18 The Design of Modern Steel Bridg
- Page 32 and 33:
20 The Design of Modern Steel Bridg
- Page 34 and 35:
22 The Design of Modern Steel Bridg
- Page 36 and 37:
24 The Design of Modern Steel Bridg
- Page 38 and 39:
26 The Design of Modern Steel Bridg
- Page 40 and 41:
28 The Design of Modern Steel Bridg
- Page 42 and 43:
30 The Design of Modern Steel Bridg
- Page 44 and 45:
32 The Design of Modern Steel Bridg
- Page 46 and 47:
34 The Design of Modern Steel Bridg
- Page 48 and 49:
36 The Design of Modern Steel Bridg
- Page 50 and 51:
38 The Design of Modern Steel Bridg
- Page 52 and 53:
40 The Design of Modern Steel Bridg
- Page 54 and 55:
42 The Design of Modern Steel Bridg
- Page 56 and 57:
44 The Design of Modern Steel Bridg
- Page 58 and 59:
Table 2.1 Properties of some commer
- Page 60 and 61:
48 The Design of Modern Steel Bridg
- Page 63 and 64:
Chapter 3 Loads on Bridges 3.1 Dead
- Page 65 and 66:
3.3 Design live loads in different
- Page 67 and 68:
interstate highways are designed fo
- Page 69 and 70:
a coefficient that depends on the n
- Page 71 and 72:
Loads on Bridges 59 In Germany, a n
- Page 73 and 74:
Table 3.6 Typical values of U and P
- Page 75 and 76:
3.5 Longitudinal forces on bridges
- Page 77 and 78:
wind loading on the traffic. An upl
- Page 79 and 80:
where r is the air density ¼ 1.226
- Page 81 and 82:
Loads on Bridges 69 minimum and max
- Page 83 and 84:
3.8 Other loads on bridges There ar
- Page 85 and 86:
References Loads on Bridges 73 wher
- Page 87 and 88:
Chapter 4 Aims of Design 4.1 Limit
- Page 89 and 90:
critical components of the structur
- Page 91 and 92:
But this is an attempt to achieve u
- Page 93 and 94:
If the basic variables R and S are
- Page 95 and 96:
educed variables defined by oi ¼ x
- Page 97 and 98:
will have a probability of failure
- Page 99 and 100:
Aims of Design 87 g m ¼ g m1 g m2
- Page 101 and 102:
Table 4.2 Failure probabilities of
- Page 103 and 104:
Chapter 5 Rolled Beam and Plate Gir
- Page 105 and 106:
as possible. But deep and thin webs
- Page 107 and 108:
eam, with an effective area equal t
- Page 109 and 110:
and stresses caused by lateral defl
- Page 111 and 112:
Figure 5.3 Beam cross-section. In t
- Page 113 and 114:
Rolled Beam and Plate Girder Design
- Page 115 and 116:
Table 5.2 Effective length factors
- Page 117 and 118:
stress is equal to p 2 E/(Le/r) 2 )
- Page 119 and 120:
equation (5.16) has been adopted fo
- Page 121 and 122:
The strain energy of the elastic re
- Page 123 and 124:
Figure 5.6 Buckling of plates in co
- Page 125 and 126:
Figure 5.8 Buckling of plate under
- Page 127 and 128:
techniques. It may be noted that th
- Page 129 and 130:
Rolled Beam and Plate Girder Design
- Page 131 and 132:
Rolled Beam and Plate Girder Design
- Page 133 and 134:
5.4.3 Effect of residual stresses R
- Page 135 and 136:
Aw ¼ 40 mm 2 , allowing for a smal
- Page 137 and 138:
Rolled Beam and Plate Girder Design
- Page 139 and 140:
Rolled Beam and Plate Girder Design
- Page 141 and 142:
Basler and Thurlimann were the firs
- Page 143 and 144:
Ostapenko/Chern gave the following
- Page 145 and 146:
where m ¼ Mp b 2 twsyw ty ¼ syw p
- Page 147 and 148:
the case of equal flanges, the tota
- Page 149 and 150:
emains flat until an elastic critic
- Page 151 and 152:
Rolled Beam and Plate Girder Design
- Page 153 and 154:
longitudinal compression is given b
- Page 155 and 156:
where Peq ¼ s1tB PE Ps Pcro Peq1
- Page 157 and 158:
Figure 5.27 Tension-field forces in
- Page 159 and 160:
5.5.6 Design of longitudinal web st
- Page 161 and 162:
when Le is the effective length for
- Page 163 and 164:
pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffif
- Page 165 and 166:
een derived as a condition for trea
- Page 167 and 168: For interaction of various stress c
- Page 169 and 170: must be at least i.e. 1 IsxbB 4 2 a
- Page 171 and 172: Chapter 6 Stiffened Compression Fla
- Page 173 and 174: Stiffened Compression Flanges of Bo
- Page 175 and 176: cross-section in which the secant s
- Page 177 and 178: longitudinal compression of the lon
- Page 179 and 180: webs of main girders is denoted by
- Page 181 and 182: Stiffened Compression Flanges of Bo
- Page 183 and 184: wherefrom Ms ¼ 2 3 PE P The net be
- Page 185 and 186: Stiffened Compression Flanges of Bo
- Page 187 and 188: Stiffened Compression Flanges of Bo
- Page 189 and 190: Stiffened Compression Flanges of Bo
- Page 191 and 192: Stiffened Compression Flanges of Bo
- Page 193 and 194: Stiffened Compression Flanges of Bo
- Page 195 and 196: Chapter 7 Cable-stayed Bridges 7.1
- Page 197 and 198: Cable-stayed Bridges 185 cables con
- Page 199 and 200: The following is a list of cable-st
- Page 201 and 202: (a) Fan system (b) Harp system (c)
- Page 203 and 204: 7.3.2 Ropes causing lateral compres
- Page 205 and 206: The spiral winding of wires around
- Page 207 and 208: polyethylene or even steel tube. Or
- Page 209 and 210: See Fig. 7.7. Imagine a cable-stay
- Page 211 and 212: It may be noted that: Et is higher
- Page 213: Reference Cable-stayed Bridges 201
- Page 216 and 217: 204 The Design of Modern Steel Brid