The Design of Modern Steel Bridges - TEDI
The Design of Modern Steel Bridges - TEDI
The Design of Modern Steel Bridges - TEDI
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
10 <strong>The</strong> <strong>Design</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Modern</strong> <strong>Steel</strong> <strong>Bridges</strong><br />
destroyed by a storm in 1864 when the stays were left loose. At the site <strong>of</strong> the<br />
present Rainbow Bridge, Keefer built a bridge <strong>of</strong> 1268 ft (387 m) span in 1869,<br />
which was destroyed by a storm in 1889. John Roebling and his son Washington<br />
went on to build several more suspension bridges, the most notable being the<br />
ones at Pittsburgh and Cincinnati, and the Great Brooklyn Bridge in New York.<br />
1.2.2 <strong>Steel</strong> bridges<br />
In the second half <strong>of</strong> the nineteenth century steel was developed and started<br />
replacing cast-iron as a structural material. <strong>The</strong> technique <strong>of</strong> using compressed<br />
air to sink caissons for foundations below water was also developed. In 1855–<br />
59 Brunel built the Chepstow Bridge over the River Wye and the Saltash<br />
Bridge over the Tamar to carry railways. <strong>The</strong>se were a combination <strong>of</strong> arch and<br />
suspension structures. A large wrought-iron tube formed the upper chord<br />
shaped like an arch; the lower chord was a pair <strong>of</strong> suspension chains in catenary<br />
pr<strong>of</strong>ile. <strong>The</strong> tube and the chains were braced together by diagonal ties and<br />
vertical struts. <strong>The</strong> first glimpse <strong>of</strong> lattice girder bridges can be seen in these<br />
designs. To carry railways over the Rhine in Germany, several bridges were<br />
built in the second half <strong>of</strong> the century, the most remarkable among them being:<br />
(1) Two bridges in Köln built in 1859, each with four spans <strong>of</strong> 338 ft (103 m)<br />
with multiple criss-cross lattice main girders 27.9 ft (8.5 m) deep.<br />
(2) A bridge at Mainz built in 1882 with four spans <strong>of</strong> 344 ft (105 m), with<br />
a combined structural system <strong>of</strong> an arched top chord, a catenary bottom<br />
chord and a lattice in-filling between them, as in Brunel’s Wye and<br />
Saltash bridges.<br />
In America, the end <strong>of</strong> the Civil War and the spread <strong>of</strong> railway construction<br />
resulted in growing demands for building bridges. To connect the Illinois and<br />
the Union Pacific railways a bridge was needed over the 1500 ft (457 m) wide<br />
mighty Mississippi river at St Louis, for which James Eads was commissioned<br />
in 1867. <strong>The</strong> sandy river bed was subject to considerable shift and scour, and<br />
rock lay at varying depths between 50 and 150 ft (15–45 m). Swirling water<br />
rose 40 ft (12 m) in summer, and in winter 20 ft (6 m) thick chunks <strong>of</strong> ice<br />
hurtled down. Eads proposed to sink caissons down to rock level by compressed<br />
air – a technique already being used in Europe (by Brunel in Saltash,<br />
for example), but <strong>of</strong>ten at the cost <strong>of</strong> illness and fatality <strong>of</strong> the workmen. Eads<br />
also decided that a suspension bridge would not be stiff enough to carry<br />
railway loading; he proposed one 520 ft (159 m) and two 502 ft (153 m) spans<br />
<strong>of</strong> lattice arch construction with steel – the first use <strong>of</strong> the recently discovered<br />
material in a bridge. Bessemer had already converted iron to steel by adding<br />
carbon in 1856 and Siemens developed the open hearth process in 1867. But<br />
the problem was to produce the enormous quantity <strong>of</strong> this new material to<br />
a guaranteed and uniform quality rightly demanded by Eads, for example