05.05.2013 Views

000 Allen FMT (i-xxii) - The Presbyterian Leader

000 Allen FMT (i-xxii) - The Presbyterian Leader

000 Allen FMT (i-xxii) - The Presbyterian Leader

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

150 Trinity Sunday/Year B<br />

Trinity Sunday/Year B<br />

Isaiah 6:1–8, (9–13)<br />

Today’s reading is referred to as Isaiah’s call or commission or his Temple<br />

vision. <strong>The</strong> text of Isaiah has been redacted so extensively that it is pointless<br />

to treat it as straightforward autobiography. In its canonical context,<br />

we have to see today’s passage as Isaiah’s commissioning for a particular<br />

political mission in relation to an invasion from Syria/Samaria in or about<br />

734 BCE. Chapters 6–8 have to do with precisely such an invasion.<br />

Although the text begins “in the year that King Uzziah died” (v. 1), we do<br />

not know the exact date of Uzziah’s death.<br />

Because the Lord instructed Isaiah to say to the people “do not comprehend<br />

. . . do not understand . . . stop their ears . . . shut their eyes . . .<br />

that they may not . . . listen . . . and comprehend . . . and turn and be<br />

healed” (vv. 9b–10), the text does two things: it validates Isaiah’s mission<br />

and explains why it did not work, why the people did not respond understandingly<br />

to Isaiah’s prophecy. Alternatively, if we see the mission as the<br />

text intends, we see that it did succeed: its purpose was to ensure that the<br />

people would not understand and turn and be healed.<br />

<strong>The</strong> theological conundrum raised by the text is this: why would God<br />

foreordain that the hearts of the people be hardened against the message<br />

of God’s prophet? <strong>The</strong> historical answer might be that Isaiah’s mission did<br />

fail and that this passage is an after-the-fact explanation of the reason for<br />

the failure—God determined ahead of time that it would fail. This statement<br />

still leaves open the question, why would God do that?<br />

In the anti-Jewish tradition that runs so strongly through the history of<br />

the church, this text has frequently been abused by putting it into the service<br />

of a displacement theology which argues that the Jews are a stubborn,<br />

obdurate people who never listened to God and that, as a consequence,<br />

the covenant has passed to us and we replace Jews in God’s affections. This<br />

is a works-righteous argument that makes God’s unconditional grace<br />

dependent on the condition that its recipients respond appropriately. Its<br />

self-contradictory nature is transparent.<br />

Our text opens in the Temple (v. 1) with the Lord sitting on an elevated<br />

throne surrounded by six seraphs. <strong>The</strong> “LORD of hosts” (v. 3) is YHWH<br />

of whom Isaiah speaks more than sixty times as “YHWH of the [heavenly]<br />

hosts” (v. 3). Seraphs means “burning ones,” which would explain the “live<br />

coal” in verse 6. Probably this text is selected for Trinity Sunday because<br />

of the threefold hymn of praise “Holy, holy, holy is the LORD of hosts”

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!