05.05.2013 Views

000 Allen FMT (i-xxii) - The Presbyterian Leader

000 Allen FMT (i-xxii) - The Presbyterian Leader

000 Allen FMT (i-xxii) - The Presbyterian Leader

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

xviii Introduction<br />

unfaithfulness, and Matthew 25:14–24, on the parable of the Talents.<br />

Linking these two texts leaves the impression that the Jewish community<br />

portrayed in Zephaniah is similar to the one-talent servant who is condemned<br />

and thrown into outer darkness. A more complicated dimension<br />

of contrast comes when the Gospel reading pictures Jesus (and the disciples)<br />

in conflict with leaders of Judaism (e.g., Pharisees, scribes, priests).<br />

Many scholars today conclude that the Gospel writers themselves polemically<br />

created such contrasts to justify a conflict and growing separation<br />

between the congregations of the Gospel writers and some other Jewish<br />

communities after the fall of the Temple in 70 CE. This motif is at work<br />

on Epiphany 9/Year B when Mark 2:23–3:6 portrays Jesus in two conflicts<br />

with the Pharisees regarding eating heads of grain and healing a person<br />

with a withered hand on the Sabbath. After these two brief incidents,<br />

Mark says vitriolically, “<strong>The</strong> Pharisees went out and immediately conspired<br />

with the Herodians against [Jesus], how to destroy [Jesus].”<br />

<strong>The</strong> third possible relationship between lectionary texts is typological.<br />

By this the lectionary means that the Old Testament reading posits a<br />

promise, prophecy, or foreshadowing that the lectionary interprets as fulfilled<br />

in the Gospel or Epistle lesson. Christian preachers sometimes intimate<br />

that the entire purpose of the lesson from the Old Testament was to<br />

predict the coming of Jesus, thus committing the errors associated with<br />

the prologue view of the Old Testament that we discussed just above. To<br />

counter this point of view, the preacher needs to encourage the congregation<br />

to recognize that the Old Testament writers did not specifically<br />

anticipate the coming of Jesus, although many ancient Jewish authors did<br />

anticipate that God would work in the future to bless Israel and the Gentiles.<br />

<strong>The</strong> preacher can help the congregation recognize that the writers<br />

of the New Testament found the ministry of Jesus to be an expression of<br />

that forward movement and can explore the idea that the Second Testament<br />

extended the promises of God to Gentiles while not negating the<br />

promises that God made to Sarah and Abraham and their descendants,<br />

promises that included Gentiles (Gen. 12:3).<br />

<strong>The</strong> Revised Common Lectionary never allows the congregation to hear<br />

in sequence the overall story that is told in the Old Testament. During the<br />

key cycles of Advent-Christmas-Epiphany Day and Lent-Easter-Pentecost<br />

Day, the Gospel lesson sets the theme for each Sunday. Even after Trinity<br />

Sunday, when the lectionary provides for semicontinuous reading of representative<br />

passages from the Old Testament, the story is told in segments<br />

separated by almost six months. In Year A, the congregation hears narratives<br />

from the Pentateuch and hears about the entry into the promised land,

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!