05.05.2013 Views

000 Allen FMT (i-xxii) - The Presbyterian Leader

000 Allen FMT (i-xxii) - The Presbyterian Leader

000 Allen FMT (i-xxii) - The Presbyterian Leader

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

192 Proper 23 [28]/Year B<br />

dust (from which God made the nonhuman creatures) but from the actual<br />

human being. <strong>The</strong>y are of the same stuff, thus suggesting primeval equality.<br />

Verse 23b contains the first direct indication of gender difference, even<br />

as it reiterates the theme of similarity-and-connection-with-difference<br />

expressed in the designations Woman (ishshah) and Male (ish).<br />

Scholars almost universally see God bringing the couple together in<br />

verse 22 as indicating that marriage is instituted by God. In the world of<br />

biblical Israel, marriage involved the female leaving her home to join the<br />

male and his family. However, some interpreters think that verse 24 preserves<br />

the memory of an earlier time when the male left his home and<br />

joined that of the woman.<br />

In its present form, the key affirmation of the latter part of the text is<br />

that male and female “become one flesh.” This statement does not mean<br />

that difference between the two is eradicated. <strong>The</strong> phrase has a sexual<br />

overtone: in the sexual relationship, male and female can become so<br />

responsive to one another that they function as one. <strong>The</strong> phrase thus signals<br />

that the two human beings work together in singularity of purpose<br />

(making use of their differences) to fulfill together the role of exercising<br />

dominion (Gen. 1:26–28).<br />

<strong>The</strong> text concludes by noting that in this pristine period of existence,<br />

they did not know shame. Shame results only from the fall.<br />

This text is ideally paired today with Mark 10:2–11, for Mark asserts its<br />

viewpoint to explain why divorce is not possible in the community of those<br />

awaiting the final apocalyptic manifestation of the realm of God. This passage<br />

is also directly or indirectly cited in 1 Corinthians 6:16 and 11:8–9,<br />

in Ephesians 5:3, and in 1 Timothy 2:13.<br />

Proper 23 [28]/Year B<br />

Job 23:1–9, 16–17+ (Semicontinuous)<br />

Intending to give Job pastoral care, friends visit Job on the ash heap of life<br />

and offer what they take to be appropriate theological interpretations of<br />

his situation. By oversimplifying, we can summarize Eliphaz (Job<br />

4:1–5:27), voicing the popular idea still heard today that obedient people<br />

succeed while the disobedient suffer (e.g., 4:6–7) and that circumstances<br />

such as Job’s are divine discipline (5:17). Bildad (8:1–22) thinks that God<br />

is just and punishes sin. <strong>The</strong> suffering of Job must, therefore, reveal that<br />

Job has sinned and should prompt Job to repent. Zophar (11:1–20)<br />

reprises the notion that God is fair and points out that God knows more

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!