05.05.2013 Views

000 Allen FMT (i-xxii) - The Presbyterian Leader

000 Allen FMT (i-xxii) - The Presbyterian Leader

000 Allen FMT (i-xxii) - The Presbyterian Leader

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

152 Proper 5 [10]/Year B<br />

under the leadership of a prophet would have better served Israel. However,<br />

each generation is responsible for its own faithfulness, and on this<br />

point, the Deuteronomists were not myopic, as we see from 1 Samuel<br />

8:1–3, where they report that the children of the great prophet Samuel<br />

(Joel and Abijah) “did not follow in [Samuel’s] ways, but turned aside after<br />

gain; they took bribes and perverted justice.” Prophetic DNA does not<br />

ensure faithfulness.<br />

<strong>The</strong> elders of Israel recognize the corruption of Joel and Abijah and seek<br />

to replace judicial and prophetic leadership of the community with that of<br />

a monarch (1 Sam. 8:4–5). <strong>The</strong> theological editors had prepared listeners<br />

for this request in Deuteronomy 17:14–20. Although the elders acknowledge<br />

the perverse behavior of Joel and Abijah, the primary reason the<br />

elders give for wanting a change of government is to be like other nations<br />

(v. 5). A reader should remember that God sought to make Israel different<br />

from other nations so that Israel could demonstrate God’s way of blessing.<br />

Samuel is displeased and consults God who is also displeased, but who<br />

accedes. According to God, in this particular instance, the people are only<br />

repeating a pattern that has characterized them since being delivered from<br />

slavery in Egypt: forsaking God and turning to other gods. In an act of<br />

pastoral care, however, God instructs Samuel to warn the people regarding<br />

the negative effects of monarchial rule (1 Sam. 8:6–9). God is willing<br />

to work with the people’s preference, but (to speak anachronistically) God<br />

wants them to make a critically informed choice.<br />

By emphasizing that the people wanted the monarch, the Deuteronomist<br />

implies that the problems that ensued in the united and divided<br />

monarchies came not from God but from the community’s own choice.<br />

Samuel confronts the people with the negative consequences of monarchy.<br />

<strong>The</strong> characteristic activity of such a ruler is to “take” from the congregation<br />

(note that this verb appears six times in this short section and is<br />

the only verb characterizing the sovereign’s activity). Samuel lists key ways<br />

the king will take from the people: sons to be warriors (implication: many<br />

will be killed), daughters to be perfumers, land and crops to go to courtiers<br />

and generals, slaves and animals to go to work for the ruler. <strong>The</strong> community<br />

will become slaves, and cry out, but God will not answer (1 Sam.<br />

8:10–18). Although, according to Samuel, this is what it means to be “like<br />

other nations,” the community redoubles its cry for a change of government<br />

(8:19–22).<br />

<strong>The</strong> church continues to be vexed with a problem similar to that<br />

described in this passage. At what points are the life and witness of the<br />

church strengthened by accommodating, even adopting, the values and

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!