15.05.2013 Views

Annual Report 2010 - SBM Offshore

Annual Report 2010 - SBM Offshore

Annual Report 2010 - SBM Offshore

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Corporate<br />

Governance<br />

Corporate Governance<br />

Structure<br />

<strong>SBM</strong> <strong>Offshore</strong> N.V. is a limited liability company<br />

(“Naamloze Vennootschap”) incorporated under<br />

the laws of The Netherlands with its statutory seat<br />

in Rotterdam. The Company has a two tier board, a<br />

Supervisory Board and a Management Board. Each<br />

Board has its specific role and task regulated by the<br />

Corporate Governance Code, laws, the articles of<br />

association and the Supervisory and Management<br />

Board rules.<br />

The Company will submit major changes in the corporate<br />

governance structure of the Company and in<br />

the compliance of the Company with the Corporate<br />

Governance Code (CGC) to the General Meeting of<br />

Shareholders under a separate agenda item.<br />

Dutch Corporate<br />

Governance Code<br />

In this section of the <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong>, the Company<br />

reports on compliance with the Code.<br />

<strong>SBM</strong> <strong>Offshore</strong> complies with all applicable principles<br />

and best practices provisions of the Code except for:<br />

BP.III.5.11: The Remuneration Committee shall not<br />

be chaired by a Supervisory Board member who is a<br />

managing board member of another listed company.<br />

Mr. R. van Gelder, chairman of the Remuneration<br />

Committee at the beginning of the year was holding<br />

a temporary position in Heijmans N.V., a Dutch<br />

listed company, primarily active on the Dutch market,<br />

which is not a competitor of the Company. In<br />

the opinion of the Supervisory Board there was no<br />

conflict of interest and therefore the Chairman of the<br />

Remuneration Committee continued in his role. This<br />

non-compliance has ceased in the course of the year<br />

under review since Mr. R. van Gelder has retired from<br />

<strong>Report</strong> of the Board of Management<br />

the Management Board of Heijmans N.V. at its <strong>2010</strong><br />

AGM. The Supervisory Board decided, moreover, to<br />

merge the Remuneration Committee and the Selection<br />

and Appointment Committee in one single committee<br />

with alternating chairmanship depending on the type<br />

of matters handled. When dealing with selection and<br />

appointment matters, the Chairman of the Supervisory<br />

Board assumes chairmanship of the Committee. When<br />

dealing with remuneration matters, Mr. F.R. Gugen, who<br />

was appointed a member of the Supervisory Board at<br />

the Extraordinary General Meeting of Shareholders of<br />

6 July <strong>2010</strong>, is the chairman of the Committee. As a<br />

consequence, the Company is now fully compliant with<br />

this best practice.<br />

BP IV.1.1: This provision mentions that the general<br />

meeting of shareholders of a company not having a<br />

specific formal structure (known as “structuurregime”)<br />

may pass a resolution to dismiss a member of the<br />

management board or of the supervisory board by<br />

an absolute majority of the votes cast. The “structure<br />

regime” does not apply to the Company. It may be<br />

provided that this majority should represent a certain<br />

proportion of the issued capital, but such proportion<br />

should not exceed one third. If this proportion of the<br />

capital is not represented at the meeting, but an absolute<br />

majority of the votes cast is in favour of a resolution<br />

to dismiss a board member, a new meeting may be<br />

convened. At that meeting a resolution may be passed<br />

by an absolute majority of the votes cast, regardless of<br />

the proportion of the capital of that meeting.<br />

Under the rules of the articles of association, a member<br />

of the Supervisory Board or Management Board can<br />

be dismissed by a majority of two thirds of the votes<br />

cast, such majority representing more than 50% of the<br />

issued share capital. The Management Board has been<br />

of the opinion that in order to take a strategic decision<br />

in a balanced manner, all shareholders should be<br />

able to be involved in the decision taking process and<br />

therefore the Best Practice provision was not applied.<br />

The Management Board and the Supervisory Board<br />

have now reviewed this position and a proposal to<br />

amend the Articles of Association of the Company will<br />

be submitted to the shareholders at the AGM. As a<br />

consequence of the proposed amendment this noncompliance<br />

will cease and the Company will become<br />

<strong>SBM</strong> <strong>Offshore</strong> – <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>2010</strong> 73

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!