Annual Report 2010 - SBM Offshore
Annual Report 2010 - SBM Offshore
Annual Report 2010 - SBM Offshore
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Corporate<br />
Governance<br />
Corporate Governance<br />
Structure<br />
<strong>SBM</strong> <strong>Offshore</strong> N.V. is a limited liability company<br />
(“Naamloze Vennootschap”) incorporated under<br />
the laws of The Netherlands with its statutory seat<br />
in Rotterdam. The Company has a two tier board, a<br />
Supervisory Board and a Management Board. Each<br />
Board has its specific role and task regulated by the<br />
Corporate Governance Code, laws, the articles of<br />
association and the Supervisory and Management<br />
Board rules.<br />
The Company will submit major changes in the corporate<br />
governance structure of the Company and in<br />
the compliance of the Company with the Corporate<br />
Governance Code (CGC) to the General Meeting of<br />
Shareholders under a separate agenda item.<br />
Dutch Corporate<br />
Governance Code<br />
In this section of the <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong>, the Company<br />
reports on compliance with the Code.<br />
<strong>SBM</strong> <strong>Offshore</strong> complies with all applicable principles<br />
and best practices provisions of the Code except for:<br />
BP.III.5.11: The Remuneration Committee shall not<br />
be chaired by a Supervisory Board member who is a<br />
managing board member of another listed company.<br />
Mr. R. van Gelder, chairman of the Remuneration<br />
Committee at the beginning of the year was holding<br />
a temporary position in Heijmans N.V., a Dutch<br />
listed company, primarily active on the Dutch market,<br />
which is not a competitor of the Company. In<br />
the opinion of the Supervisory Board there was no<br />
conflict of interest and therefore the Chairman of the<br />
Remuneration Committee continued in his role. This<br />
non-compliance has ceased in the course of the year<br />
under review since Mr. R. van Gelder has retired from<br />
<strong>Report</strong> of the Board of Management<br />
the Management Board of Heijmans N.V. at its <strong>2010</strong><br />
AGM. The Supervisory Board decided, moreover, to<br />
merge the Remuneration Committee and the Selection<br />
and Appointment Committee in one single committee<br />
with alternating chairmanship depending on the type<br />
of matters handled. When dealing with selection and<br />
appointment matters, the Chairman of the Supervisory<br />
Board assumes chairmanship of the Committee. When<br />
dealing with remuneration matters, Mr. F.R. Gugen, who<br />
was appointed a member of the Supervisory Board at<br />
the Extraordinary General Meeting of Shareholders of<br />
6 July <strong>2010</strong>, is the chairman of the Committee. As a<br />
consequence, the Company is now fully compliant with<br />
this best practice.<br />
BP IV.1.1: This provision mentions that the general<br />
meeting of shareholders of a company not having a<br />
specific formal structure (known as “structuurregime”)<br />
may pass a resolution to dismiss a member of the<br />
management board or of the supervisory board by<br />
an absolute majority of the votes cast. The “structure<br />
regime” does not apply to the Company. It may be<br />
provided that this majority should represent a certain<br />
proportion of the issued capital, but such proportion<br />
should not exceed one third. If this proportion of the<br />
capital is not represented at the meeting, but an absolute<br />
majority of the votes cast is in favour of a resolution<br />
to dismiss a board member, a new meeting may be<br />
convened. At that meeting a resolution may be passed<br />
by an absolute majority of the votes cast, regardless of<br />
the proportion of the capital of that meeting.<br />
Under the rules of the articles of association, a member<br />
of the Supervisory Board or Management Board can<br />
be dismissed by a majority of two thirds of the votes<br />
cast, such majority representing more than 50% of the<br />
issued share capital. The Management Board has been<br />
of the opinion that in order to take a strategic decision<br />
in a balanced manner, all shareholders should be<br />
able to be involved in the decision taking process and<br />
therefore the Best Practice provision was not applied.<br />
The Management Board and the Supervisory Board<br />
have now reviewed this position and a proposal to<br />
amend the Articles of Association of the Company will<br />
be submitted to the shareholders at the AGM. As a<br />
consequence of the proposed amendment this noncompliance<br />
will cease and the Company will become<br />
<strong>SBM</strong> <strong>Offshore</strong> – <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>2010</strong> 73