04.10.2012 Views

Carl%20Sagan%20-%20The%20Demon%20Haunted%20World

Carl%20Sagan%20-%20The%20Demon%20Haunted%20World

Carl%20Sagan%20-%20The%20Demon%20Haunted%20World

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Antiscience<br />

records. You cannot even ask questions of the participants. Every<br />

one of them is dead.<br />

But for many questions in science, you can rerun the event as<br />

many times as you like, examine it in new ways, test a wide range<br />

of alternative hypotheses. When new tools are devised, you can<br />

perform the experiment again and see what emerges from your<br />

improved sensitivity. In those historical sciences where you cannot<br />

arrange a rerun, you can examine related cases and begin to<br />

recognize their common components. We can't make stars<br />

explode at our convenience, nor can we repeatedly evolve through<br />

many trials a mammal from its ancestors. But we can simulate<br />

some of the physics of supernova explosions in the laboratory, and<br />

we can compare in staggering detail the genetic instructions of<br />

mammals and reptiles.<br />

The claim is also sometimes made that science is as arbitrary or<br />

irrational as all other claims to knowledge, or that reason itself is<br />

an illusion. The American revolutionary, Ethan Allen - leader of<br />

the Green Mountain Boys in their capture of Fort Ticonderoga -<br />

had some words on this subject:<br />

Those who invalidate reason ought seriously to consider<br />

whether they argue against reason with or without reason; if<br />

with reason, then they establish the principle that they are<br />

laboring to dethrone: but if they argue without reason<br />

(which, in order to be consistent with themselves they must<br />

do), they are out of reach of rational conviction, nor do they<br />

deserve a rational argument.<br />

The reader can judge the depth of this argument.<br />

Anyone who witnesses the advance of science first-hand sees an<br />

intensely personal undertaking. There are always a few - driven by<br />

simple wonder and great integrity, or by frustration with the inadequacies<br />

of existing knowledge, or simply upset with themselves for<br />

their imagined inability to understand what everyone else can - who<br />

proceed to ask the devastating key questions. A few saintly personalities<br />

stand out amidst a roiling sea of jealousies, ambition, backbiting,<br />

suppression of dissent, and absurd conceits. In some fields,<br />

243

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!