04.10.2012 Views

Carl%20Sagan%20-%20The%20Demon%20Haunted%20World

Carl%20Sagan%20-%20The%20Demon%20Haunted%20World

Carl%20Sagan%20-%20The%20Demon%20Haunted%20World

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

No Such Thing as a Dumb Question<br />

found that under suitable conditions make copies of themselves in<br />

the test tube. Some of these molecules are, like DNA and RNA,<br />

built out of nucleotides; others are not. Some use enzymes to<br />

hasten the pace of the chemistry; others do not. Sometimes there<br />

is a mistake in copying; from that point forward the mistake is<br />

copied in successive generations of molecules. Thus there get to<br />

be slightly different species of self-replicating molecules, some of<br />

which reproduce faster or more efficiently than others. These<br />

preferentially thrive. As time goes on, the molecules in the test<br />

tube become more and more efficient. We are beginning to<br />

witness the evolution of molecules. How much insight does this<br />

provide about the origin of life?<br />

• Why is ordinary ice white, but pure glacial ice blue?<br />

• Life has been found miles below the surface of the Earth. How<br />

deep does it go?<br />

• The Dogon people in the Republic of Mali are said by a French<br />

anthropologist to have a legend that the star Sirius has an<br />

extremely dense companion star. Sirius in fact does have such a<br />

companion, although it requires fairly sophisticated astronomy to<br />

detect it. So (1) did the Dogon people descend from a forgotten<br />

civilization that had large optical telescopes and theoretical astrophysics?<br />

Or, (2) were they instructed by extraterrestrials? Or, (3)<br />

did the Dogon hear about the white dwarf companion of Sirius<br />

from a visiting European? Or, (4) was the French anthropologist<br />

mistaken and the Dogon in fact never had such a legend?<br />

Why should it be hard for scientists to get science across? Some<br />

scientists, including some very good ones, tell me they'd love to<br />

popularize, but feel they lack talent in this area. Knowing and<br />

explaining, they say, are not the same thing. What's the secret?<br />

There's only one, I think: don't talk to the general audience as<br />

you would to your scientific colleagues. There are terms that<br />

convey your meaning instantly and accurately to fellow experts.<br />

You may parse these phrases every day in your professional work.<br />

But they do no more than mystify an audience of non-specialists.<br />

Use the simplest possible language. Above all, remember how it<br />

was before you yourself grasped whatever it is you're explaining.<br />

Remember the misunderstandings that you almost fell into, and<br />

313

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!