04.10.2012 Views

Carl%20Sagan%20-%20The%20Demon%20Haunted%20World

Carl%20Sagan%20-%20The%20Demon%20Haunted%20World

Carl%20Sagan%20-%20The%20Demon%20Haunted%20World

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

THE DEMON-HAUNTED WORLD<br />

colleagues', and that sceptics exhibit 'a kind of religious zeal to<br />

defend the materialistic and atheistic world view that smacks of<br />

what has been called "scientific fundamentalism" or "irrational<br />

rationalism" '.<br />

This is a common but to me deeply mysterious - indeed, occult<br />

- complaint. Again, we know a great deal about the existence and<br />

properties of matter. If a given phenomenon can already be<br />

plausibly understood in terms of matter and energy, why should<br />

we hypothesize that something else, something for which there is<br />

as yet no other good evidence, is responsible? Yet the complaint<br />

persists: sceptics won't accept that there's an invisible firebreathing<br />

dragon in my garage because they're all atheistic<br />

materialists.<br />

In Science in the New Age, scepticism is discussed, but it is not<br />

understood, and it is certainly not practised. All sorts of paranormal<br />

claims are quoted, sceptics are 'deconstructed', but you can<br />

never learn from reading it that there are ways to decide whether<br />

New Age and parapsychological claims to knowledge are promising<br />

or false. It's all, as in many postmodernist texts, a matter of<br />

how strongly people feel and what their biases may be.<br />

Robert Anton Wilson (in The New Inquisition: Irrational<br />

Rationalism and the Citadel of Science, 1986) describes sceptics as<br />

the 'New Inquisition'. But to my knowledge no sceptic compels<br />

belief. Indeed, on most TV documentaries and talk shows,<br />

sceptics get short shrift and almost no air time. All that's<br />

happening is that some doctrines and methods are being criticized<br />

- at the worst, ridiculed - in magazines like The Skeptical Inquirer<br />

with circulations of a few tens of thousands. New Agers are not<br />

much, as in earlier times, being called up before criminal tribunals,<br />

nor whipped for having visions, and they are certainly not<br />

being burned at the stake. Why fear a little criticism? Aren't they<br />

interested to see how well their beliefs hold up against the best<br />

counterarguments the sceptics can muster?<br />

Perhaps one per cent of the time, someone who has an idea that<br />

smells, feels and looks indistinguishable from the usual run of<br />

pseudoscience will turn out to be right. Maybe some undiscovered<br />

reptile left over from the Cretaceous period will indeed be found<br />

284

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!