20.05.2013 Views

Foucault, Biopolitics, and Governmentality

Foucault, Biopolitics, and Governmentality

Foucault, Biopolitics, and Governmentality

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Neuropower: Is Resistance Fertile?<br />

Warren Neidich<br />

During long periods of history, the mode of human sense perception<br />

changes with humanity’s entire mode of existence. The manner in which<br />

human sense perception is organized, the medium in which it is<br />

accomplished, is determined not only by nature but by historical circumstances<br />

as well. The fifth century, with its great shifts of population, saw the<br />

birth of the late Roman art industry <strong>and</strong> the Vienna Genesis, <strong>and</strong> there<br />

developed not only an art different from that of antiquity but also a new<br />

kind of perception. [---] They did not attempt – <strong>and</strong>, perhaps, saw no way –<br />

to show the social transformations expressed by these changes of perception.<br />

The conditions for an analogous insight are more favorable in the present.<br />

And if changes in the medium of contemporary perception can be comprehended<br />

as decay of the aura, it is possible to show its social causes.<br />

Walter Benjamin, Illuminations<br />

The three facets of neuropower<br />

Neuropower constitutes the new focus of power to administer difference in<br />

order to sculpt a people. 1 It consists of three key concepts. First <strong>and</strong> foremost<br />

it acts upon the neural plastic potential of the brain in a living present,<br />

especially during what are referred to as the critical periods of development,<br />

all the time being guided by the desire to produce a conscripted <strong>and</strong> en-<br />

1 Gilles Deleuze, “Postscript on the Societies of Control,” October 59 (Winter 1992): 3-7.<br />

The passage from the disciplinary society to the society of control <strong>and</strong> noo-politics, that<br />

is to say, the administration in the closed <strong>and</strong> wide-open spaces, previously focused on<br />

the condition of the individual <strong>and</strong> the dividual in relation to the past <strong>and</strong> the present.<br />

They described the focus of power as that which organized the interruptions <strong>and</strong><br />

undulation of flows of time <strong>and</strong> space in the disciplinary society <strong>and</strong> society of control,<br />

respectively, in the context of a “present condition of the now,” even if, for instance, as in<br />

the society of control Deleuze suggests future kinds of gadgets of control, such as an<br />

“electronic card that raises a given barrier.”<br />

133

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!