Foucault, Biopolitics, and Governmentality
Foucault, Biopolitics, and Governmentality
Foucault, Biopolitics, and Governmentality
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
JOHANNA OKSALA<br />
been given ad hoc interpretations or had baffled investigators. Becker, for<br />
example, refers to well-known phenomena such as the fact that earnings<br />
typically increase with age at a decreasing rate, <strong>and</strong> that unemployment<br />
rates tend to be negatively related to the level of skill. 21 The idea of human<br />
capital explains such phenomena by treating behavioral choices such as<br />
education <strong>and</strong> on-the-job training as investments made in people. People<br />
enhance their capabilities as producers <strong>and</strong> consumers by investing in<br />
themselves. The many ways of doing this include activities such as<br />
schooling, training, medical care, vitamin consumption, acquiring information<br />
about the economic system, <strong>and</strong> migration. 22<br />
These investments result not just in some incalculable increase in the<br />
individual’s wellbeing but also in a calculable increase in his or her income<br />
prospects. From the worker’s point of view labor comprises capital: it is<br />
ability, skills that can be acquired at a cost. Human capital comprises both<br />
innate <strong>and</strong> acquired elements. While the innate elements are largely out of<br />
our control, the acquired elements are not. If we make educational investments<br />
we can become ability machines producing income (BB, 244).<br />
The most striking example that <strong>Foucault</strong> discusses is the mother-child<br />
relationship (BB, 229-230, 243-244). A neoliberal economic analysis would<br />
treat the time the mother spends with the child, as well as the quality of the<br />
care she gives, as an investment that constitutes human capital <strong>and</strong> on<br />
which she can expect a return. Investment in the child’s human capital will<br />
produce an income when the child grows up <strong>and</strong> earns a salary. Similarly,<br />
economic analyses of marriage could be read as attempts to decipher what is<br />
traditionally considered non-economic social behavior in economic terms.<br />
Social relationships could be considered forms of investment: there are<br />
capital costs, <strong>and</strong> returns on the capital invested.<br />
The theory of human capital represents one striking example of the<br />
extension of economic analysis into a previously unexplored domain: it<br />
makes possible a strictly economic interpretation of a whole range of<br />
phenomena previously thought to be non-economic. Neoliberalism, understood<br />
as a specific form of governmentality, requires that economics can<br />
21 See Gary Becker, “Investment in Human Capital: A Theoretical Analysis,” The Journal<br />
of Political Economy, Vol. 70, No. 2 (1962), Part 2: Investment in Human Beings, 10. See<br />
also Becker, Human Capital: A Theoretical <strong>and</strong> Empirical Analysis with Special Reference<br />
to Education (New York: National Bureau of Economic Research, 1964), <strong>and</strong> Theodore<br />
W Schultz, “Reflections on Investment in Man,” The Journal of Political Economy, Vol.<br />
70, No. 2 (1962), Part 2: Investment in Human Beings, 1-8.<br />
22 See e.g. Schultz “Reflections on Investment in Man,” 2, <strong>and</strong> Becker “Investment in<br />
Human Capital,” 9.<br />
68