03.06.2013 Views

Abstracts - KTH Mechanics

Abstracts - KTH Mechanics

Abstracts - KTH Mechanics

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

102<br />

Experimental study of the effect of gas injection on oil-water<br />

phase inversion in a vertical pipe<br />

M.Descamps ∗ , R.V.A.Oliemans ∗ ,G.Ooms ∗ , R.F.Mudde ∗ and R.Kusters †<br />

In the case of a single-phase (water) flow through a vertical pipe it has been<br />

shown that the efficiency of the gas-lift technique increases, when the bubble size of<br />

the injected gas is reduced 1 . It is not clear whether this also holds for an oil-water<br />

flow through a vertical pipe, as in that case phase inversion between the two liquids<br />

can occur. This is particularly relevant for the oil industry, since the gas-lift technique<br />

is widely used for oil (with water) production. The phase inversion phenomenon has<br />

been investigated by various authors both experimentally 2 and numerically 3 , but<br />

very little is known about the influence of gas injection on this phenomenon.<br />

Therefore, an experimental study has been made of the influence of gas injection on<br />

the phase inversion between oil and water flowing through a vertical pipe. Particular<br />

attention was paid to the influence on the critical concentration of oil and water at<br />

which phase inversion occurs and on the pressure drop increase over the pipe during<br />

phase inversion. By using different types of gas injectors also the influence of the<br />

bubble size of the injected gas on the phase inversion was studied. It was found that<br />

gas injection does not significantly change the critical concentration, but the influence<br />

on the pressure drop at the point of inversion is considerable (see figure 1). Local<br />

measurements of the phase concentration and bubble size may provide an explanation.<br />

∗J.M. Burgerscentrum for Fluid <strong>Mechanics</strong>, Delft University of Technology, Kramers Laboratorium,<br />

Prins Bernhardlaan 6, 2628 BW Delft, The Netherlands<br />

† Shell International Exploration and Production B.V., Kessler Park 1, 2288 GS, Rijswijk ZH, The<br />

Netherlands<br />

1Guet et al., AICHE J. 49, 2242 (2003)<br />

2Ioannou et al., Exp. Therm. Fluid Sci. 29, 331 (2005)<br />

3Brauner and Ullmann, Int. J.Multiphase Flow 28, 1177 (2002)<br />

pressure gradient (Pa/m)<br />

11000<br />

10500<br />

10000<br />

9500<br />

9000<br />

Total pressure gradient<br />

U = 0.98 m/s<br />

m<br />

U = 1.96 m/s<br />

m<br />

U = 2.94 m/s<br />

m<br />

Water in Oil Oil in Water<br />

8500<br />

0 20 40 60<br />

water fraction (%)<br />

80 100<br />

Pressure gradient (Pa/m)<br />

11500<br />

11000<br />

10500<br />

10000<br />

9500<br />

9000<br />

8500<br />

8000<br />

0 20 40 60 80 100<br />

Water cut (%)<br />

Shell Donau Loop : Oil−Water−Air vertical upward flow<br />

U = 2.94 m/s<br />

m<br />

GVF = 2.56 %<br />

Liquid−liquid<br />

Nozzle injector<br />

Conical porous injector<br />

Circular porous injector<br />

Figure 1: Pressure gradient as function of water volume fraction for an oil-water<br />

without (left) and with (right) gas injection.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!