03.06.2013 Views

Abstracts - KTH Mechanics

Abstracts - KTH Mechanics

Abstracts - KTH Mechanics

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Investigations of turbulence statistics in the laboratory model of an<br />

atmospheric cloud<br />

P. M. Korczyk a, F. Lusseyran b, T. A. Kowalewski a, Sz. P. Malinowski c<br />

Interaction between small-scale turbulence and cloud particles is a key issue in<br />

warm rain formation mechanism, which is an important meteorological and<br />

climatological challenge 1,2. We investigate this interaction observing motion of cloud<br />

droplets in a glass walled chamber 1m deep, 1m wide and 1.8m high, described<br />

elsewhere 3. Cloudy air containing water droplets enters the main chamber forming the<br />

negatively buoyant, turbulent plume, mixing with unsaturated air in the main chamber<br />

and producing additional turbulence by evaporative cooling of droplets. The plume is<br />

illuminated with a 1.2mm thick sheet of laser light, forming the vertical cross-section<br />

through the central part of the chamber. Images of flow are recorded by a highresolution<br />

CCD cameras placed outside the chamber.<br />

Long sequences of images are collected to evaluate small scale turbulence statistics<br />

of the flow. The spatial flow characteristics are obtained using two- and threecomponent<br />

(Stereo-PIV) setup and double pulsed 35mJ Nd:YAG laser. The setup<br />

permits to record only few image pairs per second. Therefore, for temporal turbulence<br />

statistics long sequences of images (1000 and more) are acquired using high-speed<br />

CCD camera (PCO1200HS) and CW 5W Argon laser for illumination.<br />

Droplets visualized in the chamber differ from typical PIV images with uniformly<br />

distributed tracers. Chaotic dynamics of mixing observed in the experiments makes<br />

images of flow complex and not easy to process. Therefore, standard PIV algorithms<br />

have to be used with care to avoid artefacts in the velocity field. Four different PIV<br />

evaluation methods are applied and tested on our experimental data: ILA OFS PIV<br />

algorithm 4, two in house developed multi-scale dynamic widow and image deformation<br />

based PIV codes, and Optical Flow evaluation method 5. Statistical quantities and<br />

decompositions of vector fields are evaluated to check advantages of different<br />

evaluation methods. It was found that image deformation approach and in some sense<br />

equivalent Optical Flow methodology are the most reliable for our purpose.<br />

The retrieved turbulence statistics exhibit significant anisotropy in accordance with<br />

preliminary numerical findings 6. Three components PIV measurements confirm<br />

enhanced fluctuation amplitude for vertical velocity component. An attempt is made<br />

to correlate droplets distribution statistics and the measured velocity fields.<br />

a IPPT PAN, Department of <strong>Mechanics</strong> & Physics of Fluids, PL 00-049 Warszawa, Poland.<br />

b LIMSI-CNRS, 91403 Orsay, France.<br />

c Warsaw University, Institute of Geophysics, Warszawa, Poland.<br />

1 Vailancourt and Yau, Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 81, 285 (2000).<br />

2 Shaw, Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 35, 183 (2003).<br />

3 Malinowski et al., J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol. 15, 1060 (1998).<br />

4 ILA GmbH Optical Flow Systems, Germany.<br />

5 Quenot et al., Exp Fluids, 25, 177 (1998).<br />

6 Andrejczuk et al., J. Atmos Sci., 61, 1726 (2004).<br />

25

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!