You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
18<br />
Actual performance of improved WENO schemes on a<br />
selection of test cases<br />
I. Fedioun ∗ , L. Gougeon ∗ , I. Gokalp ∗<br />
Due to its simplicity, Monotone Integrated Large Eddy Simulation (MILES) has<br />
become astandardwayofLES. This form of LES is intended to capture the correct<br />
flow energy up to some scale in the inertial range and then dissipate this energy at<br />
a non linear rate depending on the numerical dissipation of the scheme. Very long<br />
time simulations should then use highly accurate schemes in conjunction with a fine<br />
enough grid to ensure that the results are not affected by the numerics 1 . From our<br />
experience on Kelvin-Helmholtz instabilities 2 , WENO schemes are good candidates<br />
for MILES but, in their initial form 3 , they still suffer from a relatively poor resolution<br />
of contact discontinuities (with smearing for larger time) and may not always preserve<br />
monotonicity. Recent works 4 5 allowed to fix these two key points, leading to a nearly<br />
optimal numerical scheme. We analyse the actual performance of this kind of modified<br />
WENO schemes and present an extension to multi-fluid simulations. This analysis is<br />
performed on several test cases sorted by order of complexity :(i) asymptotic analysis<br />
of the effective modified wave number, (ii) mono and multi-fluid shock tube problem,<br />
(iii) IWPCTM8’s test cases 6 #2(Rayleigh-Taylor) and #3 (Kelvin-Helmholtz) in 2D,<br />
(iv) 2DH2/air reacting jet with detailed chemistry and variable transport coefficients<br />
(Figure 1).<br />
∗ Laboratoire de Combustion et Systemes Reactifs, C.N.R.S., 1 C avenue de la Recherche Scientifique,<br />
45071 Orleans cedex 2, FRANCE<br />
1 Fedioun et al., Journal of Computational Physics 174, 1 (2001).<br />
2 Lardjane, These de l’Universite d’Orleans (2002).<br />
3 Shu, ICASE Report, 97-65 (1997).<br />
4 Balsara et al., Journal of Computational Physics, 160, 405 (2000).<br />
5 Xu et al., Journal of Computational Physics 205, 458 (2005).<br />
6 IWPCTM8’s test problems; http://www.llnl.gov/iwpctm/html/test.htm<br />
Figure 1: MILES of a subsonic H2/air reacting jet: instantaneous contours of H2O<br />
mass fraction.