03.06.2013 Views

Abstracts - KTH Mechanics

Abstracts - KTH Mechanics

Abstracts - KTH Mechanics

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Validation of urban dispersion simulations by comparison of<br />

simulations and measurements obtained around 2D and 3D<br />

building arrays in a wind tunnel<br />

O. Parmhed ∗ , and G. Patnaik †<br />

The recent evolution in computer power has made it possible to perform Large<br />

Eddy Simulations (LES) for complex gemotries like e.g. submarine hydrodynamics 1 .<br />

Among the present uses is the simulation of urban dispersion of airborne hazardous<br />

materials. Such material may be accidentally released in e.g. accidents with transport<br />

of industrial chemicals or deliberately released by e.g. terrorists. As an example,<br />

Figure 1(a) shows the simulated concentration of some pollutant five minutes after<br />

an instantaneous release (bomb) in the Stocholm Old Town.<br />

Although important, validation of such simulations is difficult. In this study we<br />

compare simulations to observations of the flow around building arrays in a windtunnel.<br />

As opposed to the case of the single building, there have been relatively fewer<br />

measurement campaigns of the flow around groups of buildings. For this reason, and<br />

to provide a data set suitable for the validation of Computational Fluid Dynamics<br />

(CFD) codes, Brown et al 2 conducted experiments of 2D and 3D building arrays in<br />

the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s (USEPA) Fluid Modeling Facility wind<br />

tunnel. The building arrays consist of 7 or 7x11 rectangular blocks. Figure 1(b) shows<br />

the setup for the 3D case.<br />

Here we present results from CFD simulations using LES. The simulations have<br />

been performed with various models for subgrid turbulence and with and without wall<br />

models. Two different CFD codes have been used, FOAM and Fast3D. We present<br />

here comparisons with both these codes and the measurements from the wind tunnel,<br />

Figure 1(c). In general, satisfactory results are obtained.<br />

∗ FOI, Swedish defence research agency, Grindsjön Research Centre, SE - 147 25 Tumba, Sweden<br />

† NRL, Navy Research Laboratory, Washington, DC 20375-5344, USA<br />

1 Grinstein and Fureby, Comp. Sci. Eng. 6, 37 (2004)<br />

2 Brown et al., Int. Soc. Environ. Hydraulics, Tempe, AZ, 6 (2001)<br />

(a) (b) (c)<br />

Figure 1: Simulated dispersion in the Stockholm old town (a). Along flow velocity in<br />

windtunnel validation simulation (b). Comparison of profiles (c).<br />

181

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!