You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Three-dimensional gravity-capillary interfacial solitary waves<br />
and related problems<br />
E. I. Părău ∗ , J.-M. Vanden-Broeck ∗ and M.J. Cooker ∗<br />
Fully localised three-dimensional gravity-capillary solitary interfacial waves, which<br />
travel on the interface between two superposed fluids, with a lighter fluid lying above a<br />
heavier one, are calculated. The fluids are assumed to be inviscid and incompressible<br />
and the flow is assumed to be irrotational. The fluid layers can be semi-infinite or of<br />
finite thickness. The three-dimensional problem is formulated as a nonlinear integrodifferential<br />
equation by using the Green’s identity in each layer and the dynamic<br />
boundary condition, which includes capillarity. These waves have damped oscillations<br />
in the direction of propagation, as in the two-dimensional case 1 , and also decay in the<br />
transverse direction. When the density ratio is zero, the three-dimensional solitary<br />
interfacial waves reduce to free-surface solitary water waves which were studied in<br />
recent papers. 2 3 4 The stability of the solutions is discussed. A typical solution<br />
is presented in figure 1 for central-elevation and central-depression interfacial solitary<br />
waves.<br />
The algorithm is modified to compute three-dimensional flows due to an immersed<br />
disturbance that propagates at a constant velocity U along the interface between the<br />
two fluids, and the effect of density ratio on the wave patterns is studied. Possible<br />
generalisations of the algorithm include the computation of waves when both on<br />
interface and an upper free-surface are present.<br />
∗ School of Mathematics, University of East Anglia, Norwich, NR4 7TJ, UK.<br />
1 Dias and Iooss, Eur.J. Mech./B Fluids, 15, 367(1996).<br />
2 Părău et al., J. Fluid Mech. 536, 99(2005).<br />
3 Kim and Akylas J. Fluid Mech. 540, 337(2005).<br />
4 Părău et al., Phys. Fluids 17, 122101 (2005).<br />
0.2<br />
0.1<br />
0<br />
−0.1<br />
z<br />
−0.2<br />
−0.3<br />
−0.4<br />
−0.5<br />
25<br />
20<br />
15<br />
y<br />
10<br />
5<br />
0<br />
−20<br />
−15<br />
−10<br />
−5<br />
x<br />
0<br />
5<br />
10<br />
15<br />
20<br />
y<br />
0.5<br />
0.4<br />
0.3<br />
0.2<br />
0.1<br />
0<br />
z<br />
−0.1<br />
−0.2<br />
−0.3<br />
−0.4<br />
−0.5<br />
25<br />
20<br />
15<br />
10<br />
5<br />
0<br />
−20 −15 −10 −5 0 x<br />
5 10 15 20<br />
Figure 1: (a) Central elevation wave (b) Central depression wave. Only half of the<br />
each symmetric solution is shown. The waves propagate in the x direction.<br />
121